Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective

Exploring Knowledge as a Social Phenomenon

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Books and Book Reviews
  • Collective Judgment Forum
  • Collective Vision
  • Critical Appreciation
  • Critical Replies
  • Site Bibliography
  • Special Issues
  • Who We Are
  • Article Submissions
  • Blogroll
    • Conferences
    • Special Issues
  • Book Review Guidelines
  • Book Review Submissions
  • Book Reviews
  • Book Series
  • Book Symposiums
  • Collective Vision
  • Site Bibliography
  • Submission Guidelines
  • About
  • Who We Are
  • Links

Home › Uncategorized › Protected: First Things: “Humanity 4.5”, Mark Shiffman

Protected: First Things: “Humanity 4.5”, Mark Shiffman

By SERRC on November 18, 2015

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

‹ The Role of Evidence in Judging Kuhn’s Model: On the Mizrahi, Patton, Marcum Exchange, Vasso Kindi
Humanity 4.5, Mark Shiffman ›

Categories: Uncategorized

Pages

  • About
  • Article Submissions
  • Blogroll
    • Conferences
    • Special Issues
  • Book Review Guidelines
  • Book Review Submissions
  • Book Reviews
  • Book Series
  • Book Symposiums
  • Collective Vision
  • Links
  • Site Bibliography
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Who We Are
November 2015
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Archives

academic disciplines Adam Briggle Adam Riggio Bernard Wills book reviews Books and Book Reviews Brian Martin Bruno Latour conspiracy theories conspiracy theory Critical Replies culture David-Hillel Ruben disciplinarity Donald Trump education epistemic agency epistemic ethics epistemic injustice epistemic methods epistemic politics epistemic practices epistemology ethics expertise expert knowledge experts Gregory Sandstrom Heidegger history History of Philosophy history of science human rights ideology institutions Intelligent Design Interdisciplinarity Islam and Science Justin Cruickshank Karl Popper knowledge knowledge and justification language Lee Basham logic Matthew R. X. Dentith Miranda Fricker Morality Moti Mizrahi neoliberalism ontology phenomenal knowledge philosophy of science Philosophy of Technology politics possessing knowledge post-truth public intellectuals racism Raphael Sassower Richard Rorty Robert Frodeman science scientific communication scientific knowledge scientific practice scientism skepticism social epistemology social production of knowledge Stefano Bigliardi Steve Fuller technology Thomas Kuhn transhumanism

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,990 other followers

The Fundamental Question of Social Epistemology

How should the pursuit of knowledge be organized, given that under normal circumstances knowledge is pursued by many human beings, each working on a more or less well-defined body of knowledge and each equipped with roughly the same imperfect cognitive capacities, albeit with varying degree of access to one another’s activities?

— Steve Fuller, 1988

SERRC Tweets

My Tweets
Create a website or blog at WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.