Month: March 2016

Response to Gulick: Complementarity, Fault Lines, Terminology, Metaphors and Assertions, Richard W. Moodey

Author Information: Richard W. Moodey, Gannon University, moodey001@gannon.edu Moodey, Richard W. “Response to Gulick: Complementarity, Fault Lines, Terminology, Metaphors and Assertions.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 15-20. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-2HD… Read More ›

A Reply to Hamza’s “Faith and Reason: The Re-Emergence of Neo-Mu’tazilite Thought in the Discourse of Modern Muslim Scientists”, Jamal Mimouni

Author Information: Jamal Mimouni, Mentouri University, jamalmimouni@yahoo.com Mimouni, Jamal. “A Reply to Hamza’s ‘Faith and Reason: The Re-Emergence of Neo-Mu’tazilite Thought in the Discourse of Modern Muslim Scientists’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 5-9. The… Read More ›

Interdisciplining Knowledge or Disciplining Interdisciplinarity? A Reply to Huutoniemi’s “Interdisciplinarity as Academic Accountability”, Gabriele Bammer

Author Information: Gabriele Bammer, The Australian National University, Gabriele.Bammer@anu.edu.au Bammer, Gabriele. “Interdisciplining Knowledge or Disciplining Interdisciplinarity? A Reply to Huutoniemi’s “’Interdisciplinarity as Academic Accountability.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 1-4. The PDF of the article… Read More ›