SERRC: Most Viewed Monthly Posts of 2022

The list below provides the articles, replies, and reviews most viewed on the month of their initial posting in 2022. And please review 2021’s list.

We invite you to read a sample of the exceptional range of contributions that the SERRC receives. We hope you will join us in reading and contributing to the SERRC in the coming year.

January
❧ Levy, Neil. 2022. “The Bias that Unites Us: A Reply to Keith Stanovich.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (1): 14-17.

February
❧ Fuller, Steve. 2022. “Transhumanism in the Schools Redux.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (2): 19-21.

March
❧ Alcón, Chema Sánchez. 2022. “The Fly is Trapped Inside the Bottle: A Semiotic and Epistemological Critique of the Idea of Disability.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (3): 45-51.

April
❧ Gilks, Mark. 2022. “The Pride and Shame of Being a Soldier.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (4): 5-11.

May
❧ Becker, Joffrey. 2022. “The Three Problems of Robots and AI.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (5): 44-49.

June
❧ Radenović, Ljiljana. 2022. “Weaving Faith into a Moral Life.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (6): 1-6.

July
❧ Radenović, Ljiljana. 2022. “Misunderstanding the Human and the Divine.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (7): 9-14.

August
❧ Hagen, Kurtis. 2022. “A Bibliography and Brief History of the Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 27-37.

September
❧ Frohock, Richard and Eric Winsberg. 2022. “Expert Opinion, Social Robustness, and COVID-19: A Response to Yu.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (9): 1-6.

October
❧ Bouzid, Ahmed. 2022. “‘Post-Truth’: The Only Path Forward.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (10): 14-19.

November
❧ Hill, Scott. 2022. “Substantive Disagreement in the Le Monde Debate and Beyond: Replies to Duetz and Dentith, Basham, and Hewitt.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (11): 18-25.

December
❧ Harman, Graham. 2022. “A Response to Sheldon Richmond’s Review of Architecture and Objects. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (12): 36-41.



Categories: Comments

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply