Author Information: Matthew R. X. Dentith, University of Auckland, m.dentith@episto.org Dentith, Matthew R.X. “Treating Conspiracy Theories Seriously: A Reply to Basham on Dentith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 1-5. The PDF of the article gives… Read More ›
Critical Replies
Critical Replies are engagements with articles recently published in Social Epistemology.
Combes on McCraw on the Nature of Epistemic Trust: A Rejoinder, Benjamin W. McCraw
Author Information: Benjamin W. McCraw, University of South Carolina Upstate, bmccraw@uscupstate.edu McCraw, Benjamin W. “Combes on McCraw on the Nature of Epistemic Trust: A Rejoinder.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 28-31. The PDF of the… Read More ›
Collective Knowledge and Collective Justification, K. Brad Wray
Author Information: K. Brad Wray, State University of New York, Oswego, brad.wray@oswego.edu Wray, K. Brad. “Collective Knowledge and Collective Justification.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 24-27. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers…. Read More ›
A Principled Standpoint: A Reply to Sandra Harding, María G. Navarro
Author Information: María G. Navarro, Spanish National Research Council, ordinaryreasoning@gmail.com Navarro, María G. “A Principled Standpoint: A Reply to Sandra Harding.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 17-23. The PDF of the article gives specific page… Read More ›
How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology? A Further Reply to Kidd, Massimo Pigliucci
Author Information: Massimo Pigliucci, City College of New York, massimo@platofootnote.org Pigliucci, Massimo. “How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology? A Further Reply to Kidd.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 10-16. The PDF of the article gives… Read More ›
Refining and Extending Necro-Waste, Philip R. Olson
Author Information: Philip R. Olson, Virginia Tech, prolson@vt.edu Olson, Philip R. “Refining and Extending Necro-Waste.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 5-9. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-38k Please refer to:… Read More ›
Plant Elicitors as Bio-Objects , Niki Vermeulen
Author Information: Niki Vermeulen, University of Edinburgh, Niki.Vermeulen@ed.ac.uk Vermeulen, Niki. “Plant Elicitors as Bio-Objects.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 1-4. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-37S Please refer to: Blanchard,… Read More ›
Adam Smith’s Sympathetic Imagination: A Reply to Lennon, Millicent Churcher
Author Information: Millicent Churcher, The University of Sydney, millicent.churcher@sydney.edu.au Churcher, Millicent. “Adam Smith’s Sympathetic Imagination: A Reply to Lennon.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 63-68. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink:… Read More ›
The Pragmatic Radicalism of the Multitude’s Power: A Critical Eye on Fuller’s Return to Pareto, Adam Riggio
Author Information: Adam Riggio, Independent Scholar and Writer, adamriggio@gmail.com Riggio, Adam. “The Pragmatic Radicalism of the Multitude’s Power: A Critical Eye on Fuller’s Return to Pareto.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 54-62. The PDF of… Read More ›
Knowledge as It Says on the Tin: Reply to Moodey, Harry Collins
Author Information: Harry Collins, Cardiff University, CollinsHM@cardiff.ac.uk Collins, Harry. “Knowledge as It Says on the Tin: Response to Moodey.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 50-51. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink:… Read More ›