Author Information: Alexander Bird and James Ladyman, University of Bristol, plajb@bristol.ac.uk, James.Ladyman@bristol.ac.uk Bird, Alexander and James Ladyman. 2013.“Free Inquiry: The Haldane Principle and the Significance of Scientific Research.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (7) 14-22. The PDF of… Read More ›
Critical Replies
Critical Replies are engagements with articles recently published in Social Epistemology.
Social mechanisms and explanatory pluralism, Melinda Fagan
Author Information: Melinda Fagan, Rice University, SERRC, mbf2@rice.edu Fagan, Melinda. 2013. “Social mechanisms and explanatory pluralism: Reflections on the Persson-Little-Chuang debate.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (7): 6-11. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink:… Read More ›
The Regeneration of the Book Review: A Reply to Stephen T. Casper, Adam Riggio
Author Information: Adam Riggio, McMaster University, SERRC, adamriggio@gmail.com Riggio, Adam. 2013. The Regeneration of the Book Review. A Reply to Stephen T. Casper. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (7): 1-5. The PDF of the article gives specific page… Read More ›
Is Waste Indeterminacy Useful? A response to Zsuzsa Gille, Myra J. Hird
Author Information: Myra J. Hird, Queen’s University, myrahird@me.com Hird, Myra J. 2013. Is waste indeterminacy useful? A response to Zsuzsa Gille. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (6): 28-33. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink:… Read More ›
Response to Ginev, “Scrutinizing Scientism from a Hermeneutic Point of View”, Robert P. Crease
Author Information: Robert P. Crease, Stony Brook University, robert.crease@stonybrook.edu Crease, Robert P. 2013. “Response to Ginev, ‘Scrutinizing Scientism from a Hermeneutic Point of View’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (6): 18-22. The PDF of the article gives specific… Read More ›
Anthropology as multi-natural ontology? A response to Marianne de Laet’s “Anthropology as social epistemology”, Helene Ratner
Author Information: Helene Ratner, Copenhagen Business School, hr.lpf@cbs.dk Ratner, Helene. 2013. “Anthropology as multi-natural ontology? A response to Marianne de Laet’s ‘Anthropology as social epistemology’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (6): 5-11. The PDF of the article gives… Read More ›
Reputation and Social Mechanisms : A Comment on Origgi’s “A Social Epistemology of Reputation”, Gianluca Manzo
Author Information: Gianluca Manzo, GEMASS–CNRS and University of Paris-Sorbonne, glmanzo@msh-paris.fr Manzo, Gianluca. 2013. “Reputation and Social Mechanisms: A Comment on Origgi’s ‘A Social Epistemology of Reputation’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (5): 45-50. The PDF of the article… Read More ›
A Further Reply to Rockmore, Ilya Kasavin
Author Information: Ilya Kasavin, Russian Academy of Sciences itkasavin@gmail.com Kasavin, Ilya. 2013. “A Further Reply to Rockmore.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (5) 12-14. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-JZ Please refer to:… Read More ›
The Role of Culture and Understanding in Research, Carl Martin Allwood
Author Information: Carl Martin Allwood, University of Gothenburg, Sweden cma@psy.gu.se Allwood, Carl Martin. 2013. “The Role of Culture and Understanding in Research.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (5) 1-11. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers…. Read More ›
Epistemology or Politics? Louise Antony
Author Information: Louise Antony, University of Massachusetts Amherst, louise.antony@gmail.com Antony, Louise. 2013. Epistemology or Politics? Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (4) 16-23. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-Je Please refer to: Scheman, Naomi…. Read More ›