Recent Posts - page 2
-
A Critical Review of Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game by Steve Fuller, Des Hewitt
Reviewing Steve Fuller’s book, Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game, from the Greek island of Zakynthos, in the middle of a global pandemic is a surreal experience…. [please read below the rest of the article]. Article Citation: Hewitt, Des. 2020…. Read More ›
-
How Van Woudenberg Got How History Gets it Wrong Wrong, Alex Rosenberg
Imagine a philosopher steeped in scholasticism reacting to the Newtonian world picture: Newton’s Principia Mathematica, illustrates what can happen when one doesn’t really reflect on the foundations of what one is thinking and claiming …[please read below the rest of… Read More ›
-
Political Imaginaries: A Preliminary Response, Angelos Mouzakitis
The imaginary has recently re-emerged as a central problem in social theory and—in various guises—as a subject of major interest of research conducted in the various sub-branches of the social sciences. It is early days yet to decide if we… Read More ›
-
The American University, the Politics of Professors and the Narrative of “Liberal Bias,” Charlie Tyson and Naomi Oreskes
It is often claimed that political conservatives and even moderates are an endangered species in contemporary academic life. The overabundance of liberals in the academy has allegedly led to three interrelated problems … [please read below the rest of the… Read More ›
-
Reflections on Boundary Work on Social Epistemology, Hanna Kiri Gunn
“Boundary work” refers to the practice of establishing and defining research areas, which in part involves locating research questions or topics within particular disciplines. As a consequence, boundary work also involves practices that put boundaries around ourselves as researchers of… Read More ›
-
SERRC, Volume 9, Issue 7, July 2020
Volume 9, Issue 7, July 2020 Articles, Replies, and Reviews ❧ Smith, Nicholas D. 2020. “Collective Belief Questioned.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (7): 58-63. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5f0. ❧ Wallace, Rodrick. 2020. “A Comment on Collective Belief.” Social Epistemology Review… Read More ›
-
Collective Belief Questioned, Nicholas D. Smith
In their impressive article, “Collective Belief Defended,” Michael G. Bruno and J. M. Fritzman argue “that there are no fundamental obstacles to ontologically countenancing conscious cognitive collectives” (Bruno and Fritzman 2020, 1) … [please read below the rest of the… Read More ›
-
A Comment on Collective Belief, Rodrick Wallace
As Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela (1980) and others remark at some length, cognitive phenomena pervade biology from individual cellular function, ‘simple’ wound healing, through immune maintenance and response, tumor control, neural function, social interaction, and so on (e.g., Wallace… Read More ›
-
Google-Knowing From Within Google’s Political Economy: In Reply to Inna Kouper, Vicki Macknight
I extend thanks to Inna Kouper for her response to “(Google-) Knowing Economics”, which I co-authored with Fabien Medvekcy. The points she raises are fascinating and important, as is this whole area of study. How we come to know with… Read More ›
Featured Categories
Critical Replies ›
-
Further Remarks on “Epistemic Barriers to Rational Voting: The Case of European Parliament Elections,” Faruk Aksoy
September 17, 2020
-
A Dialogue Over Hierarchy and the Political Imaginary, Craig Browne
September 15, 2020
Articles ›
-
A Critical Review of Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game by Steve Fuller, Des Hewitt
August 18, 2020
-
The American University, the Politics of Professors and the Narrative of “Liberal Bias,” Charlie Tyson and Naomi Oreskes
August 7, 2020