Author Information: Ian James Kidd, Durham University, ian.kidd@nottingham.ac.uk Kidd, Ian James. “Cranks, Pluralists, and Epistemic Vices.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 7-9. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3Cp Please refer… Read More ›
astrology
Feyerabend and the Cranks: A Response to Shaw, Massimo Pigliucci
Author Information: Massimo Pigliucci, City College of New York, massimo@platofootnote.org Pigliucci, Massimo. “Feyerabend and the Cranks: A Response to Shaw.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2016): 1-6. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers…. Read More ›
Feyerabend and the Cranks: On Demarcation, Epistemic Virtues, and Astrology, Jamie Shaw
Author Information: Jamie Shaw, Western University, jshaw222@uwo.ca Shaw, Jamie. “Feyerabend and the Cranks: On Demarcation, Epistemic Virtues, and Astrology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 74-88. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink:… Read More ›
How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology? A Further Reply to Kidd, Massimo Pigliucci
Author Information: Massimo Pigliucci, City College of New York, massimo@platofootnote.org Pigliucci, Massimo. “How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology? A Further Reply to Kidd.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 10-16. The PDF of the article gives… Read More ›
How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology? A Reply to Pigliucci, Ian James Kidd
Author Information: Ian James Kidd, University of Nottingham, ian.kidd@nottingham.ac.uk Kidd, Ian James. “How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology? A Reply to Pigliucci.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 11-17. The PDF of the article gives specific… Read More ›