We enter this conversation precisely to continue this productive exchange on the lessons to be learned from L’Aquila, grounding our response to both DeVasto and Felbacher-Escamilla on our previous work about the same case published in 2019 in Rhetoric &… Read More ›
I would like to thank Danielle DeVasto for her careful discussion of my (2019) reconstruction and for putting it into the broader context of research on the L’Aquila 2009 case. Before coming to the above outlined discussion of overflow, its… Read More ›
Author Information: Zoltan Majdik, North Dakota State University, zoltan.majdik@ndsu.edu Majdik, Zoltan. “Expertise as Practice: A Response to DeVasto.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 11 (2016): 1-6. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3hQ… Read More ›
Author Information: Danielle DeVasto, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, dmhartke@uwm.edu DeVasto, Danielle. “Matters of Concern and the Politics of Who: A Response to Herndl.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 14-17. The PDF of the article gives specific… Read More ›
Author Information: Carl G. Herndl, University of South Florida, cgh@usf.edu Herndl, Carl G. “Doing and Knowing in the L’Aquila Case.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 1-6. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers…. Read More ›