During the last few decades, the proliferation of interest in conspiracy theories has grown tremendously. What was once a niche interest of the very few is now a widespread phenomenon in our culture—from political campaigns and mainstream news, to the… Read More ›
Wagner-Egger et al. (2019) continue to defend a project of pathologizing and “curing” the public of doubts about the reliability of government, media and corporate statements and actions. They envision a mass psychological engineering project to curtail rational social epistemology, one particularly, but not limited to, targeting children in public schools. The… Read More ›
Wagner-Egger et al. (2019) continue to defend a project of pathologizing and “curing” the public of doubts about the reliability of government, media and corporate statements and actions. They envision a mass psychological engineering project to curtail rational social epistemology, one particularly, but not limited to, targeting children in public schools. The… Read More ›
Author Information: David Coady, University of Tasmania, Australia, david.coady@utas.edu.au Coady, David. 2012. Decision-making and credibility. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1 (8): 13-15 The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-pq Please refer to: Riggs, Wayne…. Read More ›
Author Information: Wayne Riggs, University of Oklahoma, wriggs@ou.edu Riggs, Wayne. 2012. Response to David Coady. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1 (7): 17-20. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-nG Please refer to: Riggs, Wayne…. Read More ›
Author Information: David Coady, University of Tasmania, David.Coady@utas.edu.au Coady, David. 2012. Critical reply to “Culpability for Epistemic Injustice: Deontic or Aretetic?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1 (5): 3-6. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink:… Read More ›