Is the constructivist analysis of science a hindrance to clear thinking, in particular clear thinking about the politics of science? […] This question arose from my discussions with Alan Sokal, who expressed his view that constructivism does indeed hinder clear… Read More ›
epistemic relativism
What Is “Genuine” African Philosophy? Anke Graness
Author Information: Anke Graness, University of Hildesheim, anke.graness@atunivie.ac.at. Graness, Anke. “What Is ‘Genuine’ African Philosophy? An Answer to John Lamola.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 4 (2019): 6-13. The pdf of the article gives specific page references…. Read More ›
Decolonising Science in Canada, Jeff Kochan
Author Information: Jeff Kochan, University of Konstanz, jwkochan@gmail.com. Kochan, Jeff. “Decolonising Science in Canada: A Work in Progress.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 11 (2018): 42-47. The pdf of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-43i This… Read More ›
Asking the Best Questions About Epistemology, Adam Riggio
Author Information: Adam Riggio, Royal Crown College, serrc.digital@gmail.com. Riggio, Adam. “Asking the Best Questions About Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 11 (2018): 31-35. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-42Y My response to… Read More ›
The Turn of Postscript Narratives, Priyadarshini Vajaisri
Author Information: Priyadarshini Vijaisri, Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, vijaisri@csds.in. Vijaisri, Priyadarshini. “The Turn of Postscript Narratives.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 10. (2018): 22-27. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-41H Recalcitrant… Read More ›
Fundamental vs. Derivative; Useful vs. Useless: A Response to Bland, Richard Fumerton
Author Information: Richard Fumerton, University of Iowa, richard-fumerton@uiowa.edu Fumerton, Richard. “Fundamental vs. Derivative; Useful vs. Useless: A Response to Bland.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 56-59. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers…. Read More ›
Norms and the Temptations of Relativism: A Reply to Sankey, Chris Lepock
Author Information: Chris Lepock, Athabasca University, clepock@gmail.com Lepock, Chris. “Norms and the Temptations of Relativism: A Reply to Sankey.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 37-42. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink:… Read More ›