Author Information: Helen Lauer, University of Dar es Salaam, helenlauer@yahoo.com. Lauer, Helen. “Scientific Consensus and the Discursive Dilemma.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 9 (2018): 33-44. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-40R Global… Read More ›
evidence based medicine
Posing Questions, Eschewing Hierarchies: A Response to Katikireddi, Justin Parkhurst
Author Information: Justin Parkhurst, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Justin.Parkhurst@lshtm.ac.uk Parkhurst, Justin. “Posing Questions, Eschewing Hierarchies: A Response to Katikireddi.” [1]. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 62-67. The PDF of the article gives… Read More ›
Reply to “What Constitutes ‘Good’ Evidence for Public Health and Social Policy Making? From Hierarchies to Appropriateness”, Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
Author Information: Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, University of Glasgow, vittal.katikireddi@glasgow.ac.uk Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal. “Reply to ‘What Constitutes “Good” Evidence for Public Health and Social Policy Making? From Hierarchies to Appropriateness’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 51-55…. Read More ›
What Constitutes ‘Good’ Evidence for Public Health and Social Policy Making? From Hierarchies to Appropriateness, Justin O. Parkhurst and Sudeepa Abeysinghe
Author Information: Justin O. Parkhurst, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, justin.parkhurst@lshtm.ac.uk ; Sudeepa Abeysinghe, University of Edinburgh, Sudeepa.Abeysinge@ed.ac.uk Parkhurst, Justin O and Sudeepa Abeysinghe. “What Constitutes ‘Good’ Evidence for Public Health and Social Policy Making? From Hierarchies to… Read More ›
Feminist Theories of Evidence and Biomedical Research Communities: A Reply to Goldenberg, Sharyn Clough
Author Information: Sharyn Clough, Oregon State University, sharyn.clough@oregonstate.edu Clough, Sharyn. “Feminist Theories of Evidence and Biomedical Research Communities: A Reply to Goldenberg.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 72-76. The PDF of the article gives specific… Read More ›