I argued that the detrimental effects of acts of dismissive incomprehension stem from their nature as conflictive verbal actions […] which overtly damage an individual’s quality face as a knower and informer […] In other words, dismissive incomprehension undermines an… Read More ›
Manuel Padilla Cruz
Dismissive Incomprehension Revisited: Testimonial Injustice, Saving Face, and Silence, Matthew Cull
Manuel Padilla Cruz has written an excellent response piece (Padilla Cruz 2019) to my initial article (Cull 2019) on dismissive incomprehension, where he raises a number of interesting issues and has put forward a number of excellent ideas for avenues for… Read More ›
Reconsidering Dismissive Incomprehension—Its Relation to Epistemic Injustices, Its Damaging Nature, and a Research Agenda: A Reply to Cull, Manuel Padilla Cruz
Matthew J. Cull (2019) has recently identified dismissive incomprehension and described it as an epistemically demolishing verbal action. It consists of a (fake) expression of ignorance or non-understanding of some information by a receiver who happens to be in a… Read More ›
On the Successfulness of Venting and Its Venues, Manuel Padilla Cruz
Author Information: Manuel Padilla Cruz, Universidad de Sevilla, mpadillacruz@us.es. Padilla Cruz, Manuel. “On the Successfulness of Venting and Its Venues.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 2 (2019): 39-48. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-46P … Read More ›
On the Pragmatic and Conversational Features of Venting, Manuel Padilla-Cruz
Author Information: Manuel Padilla-Cruz, Universidad de Sevilla, mpadillacruz@us.es. Padilla-Cruz, Manuel. “On the Pragmatic and Conversational Features of Venting: A Reply to Thorson and Baker.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 2 (2019): 21-30. The pdf of the article gives specific… Read More ›
One Thing is Testimonial Injustice and Another Is Conceptual Competence Injustice, Manuel Padilla Cruz
Author Information: Manuel Padilla Cruz, Universidad de Sevilla, mpadillacruz@us.es Padilla Cruz, Manuel. “One Thing is Testimonial Injustice and Another Is Conceptual Competence Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 3 (2018): 9-19. The pdf of the article gives specific page… Read More ›
Conceptual Competence Injustice and Relevance Theory, Manuel Padilla Cruz
Author Information: Manuel Padilla Cruz, University of Seville, mpadillacruz@us.es Cruz, Manuel Padilla. “Conceptual Competence Injustice and Relevance Theory, A Reply to Derek Anderson.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 12 (2017): 39-50. Please refer to: Anderson, Derek. “Conceptual Competence Injustice.” Social Epistemology 31,… Read More ›
Relevance Theory and Conceptual Competence Injustice, Derek Anderson
Author Information: Derek Anderson, Boston University, derek.e.anderson@gmail.com Anderson, Derek. “Relevance Theory and Conceptual Competence Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 35-39. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3Ec Please refer to:… Read More ›
On the Usefulness of the Notion of ‘Conceptual Competence Injustice’ to Linguistic Pragmatics, Manuel Padilla Cruz
Author Information: Manuel Padilla Cruz, Universidad de Sevilla, mpadillacruz@us.es Padilla Cruz, Manuel. “On the Usefulness of the Notion of ‘Conceptual Competence Injustice’ to Linguistic Pragmatics.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 4 (2017): 12-19. The PDF of the… Read More ›