Author Information: Patrick Stokes, Deakin University, patrick.stokes@deakin.edu.au Stokes, Patrick. “Reluctance and Suspicion: Reply to Basham and Dentith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 48-58. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3qM Please… Read More ›
Matthew R. X. Dentith
Clearing Up Some Conceptual Confusions About Conspiracy Theory Theorising, Matthew R. X. Dentith and Martin Orr
Author Information: Matthew R. X. Dentith, University of Bucharest, m.dentith@episto.org; Martin Orr, Boise State University, orr.martin@gmail.com Dentith, Matthew R. X. and Martin Orr. “Clearing Up Some Conceptual Confusions About Conspiracy Theory Theorising.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no…. Read More ›
Distributing the Epistemic Burden, Matthew R. X. Dentith
Author Information: Matthew R. X. Dentith, ICUB Fellow, University of Bucharest, m.dentith@episto.org Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3nl Editor’s Note: As we near the end of an eventful 2016, the SERRC will publish reflections considering broadly the immediate future of social epistemology as an… Read More ›
Between Two Generalisms: A Reply to Stokes, Lee Basham
Author Information: Lee Basham, South Texas College, labasham@southtexascollege.edu Basham, Lee. “Between Two Generalisms: A Reply to Stokes.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 12 (2016): 4-12. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3lM Editors… Read More ›
In Defence of Particularism: A Reply to Stokes, Matthew R. X. Dentith
Author Information: Matthew R. X. Dentith, ICUB, University of Bucharest, m.dentith@episto.org Dentith, Matthew R. X. “In Defence of Particularism: A Reply to Stokes.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 11 (2016): 27-33. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers…. Read More ›
Between Generalism and Particularism about Conspiracy Theory: A Response to Basham and Dentith, Patrick Stokes
Author Information: Patrick Stokes, Deakin University, patrick.stokes@deakin.edu.au Stokes, Patrick. “Between Generalism and Particularism about Conspiracy Theory: A Response to Basham and Dentith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 10 (2016): 34-39. The PDF of the article gives specific… Read More ›
Social Science’s Conspiracy-Theory Panic: Now They Want to Cure Everyone, Lee Basham and Matthew R. X. Dentith
Author Information: Lee Basham, South Texas College, labasham@southtexascollege.edu; Matthew R. X. Dentith, The Research Institute of the University of Bucharest, m.dentith@episto.org Basham, Lee and Matthew R. X. Dentith. “Social Science’s Conspiracy-Theory Panic: Now They Want to Cure Everyone.” Social Epistemology… Read More ›
Treating Conspiracy Theories Seriously: A Reply to Basham on Dentith, Matthew R. X. Dentith
Author Information: Matthew R. X. Dentith, University of Auckland, m.dentith@episto.org Dentith, Matthew R.X. “Treating Conspiracy Theories Seriously: A Reply to Basham on Dentith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 1-5. The PDF of the article gives… Read More ›
The Need for Accountable Witnesses: A Reply to Dentith, Lee Basham
Author Information: Lee Basham, South Texas College, labasham@southtexascollege.edu Basham, Lee. “The Need for Accountable Witnesses: A Reply to Dentith.” [1] Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 6-13. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers…. Read More ›