Author Information: Mirko Farina, King’s College London, mirko.farina@kcl.ac.uk. Farina, Mirko. “Exploring the Concepts of Science in 166 Pages: Reviewing Nigel Sanitt.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 4 (2019): 28-33. The pdf of the article gives specific page… Read More ›
Author Information: Markus Arnold, University of Klagenfurt, markus.arnold@aau.at Arnold, Markus. “Is There Anything Wrong with Thomas Kuhn?.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 5 (2018): 42-47. The pdf of the article gives specific page references: Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3Xs Twenty-two years after his… Read More ›
Author Information: Val Dusek, University of New Hampshire, valdusek@aol.com Dusek, Val. “Regarding Alternative Scientific Theories: A Reply to Pigliucci.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 10-14. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink:… Read More ›
Author Information: Ian James Kidd, Durham University, ian.kidd@nottingham.ac.uk Kidd, Ian James. “Cranks, Pluralists, and Epistemic Vices.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 7-9. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3Cp Please refer… Read More ›
Author Information: Massimo Pigliucci, City College of New York, massimo@platofootnote.org Pigliucci, Massimo. “Feyerabend and the Cranks: A Response to Shaw.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2016): 1-6. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers…. Read More ›
Author Information: Jamie Shaw, Western University, jshaw222@uwo.ca Shaw, Jamie. “Feyerabend and the Cranks: On Demarcation, Epistemic Virtues, and Astrology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 74-88. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink:… Read More ›
Author Information: Massimo Pigliucci, City College of New York, massimo@platofootnote.org Pigliucci, Massimo. “How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology? A Further Reply to Kidd.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 10-16. The PDF of the article gives… Read More ›
Author Information: Ian James Kidd, University of Nottingham, ian.kidd@nottingham.ac.uk Kidd, Ian James. “How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology? A Reply to Pigliucci.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 11-17. The PDF of the article gives specific… Read More ›
Author Information: Massimo Pigliucci City College of New York, platofootnote.org, mpigliucci@ccny.cuny.edu Pigliucci, Massimo. “Was Feyerabend Right in Defending Astrology? A Commentary on Kidd.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 1-6. The PDF of the article gives… Read More ›
Author Information: Leandro Rodriguez Medina, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, leandro.rodriguez@udlap.mx Rodriguez Medina, Leandro. “From Humanising to Politicizing Sociological Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 67-70. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers…. Read More ›