Author Information: Ilya Kasavin, Russian Academy of Science, itkasavin@gmail.com Kasavin, Ilya. “Why so Romantic and A Priori? A Reply to Bakhurst and Sismondo.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 20-22. The PDF of the article gives… Read More ›
philosophy of science
For 2017: Beyond Precaution, Alcibiades Malapi-Nelson
Author Information: Alcibiades Malapi-Nelson, alci.malapi@outlook.com Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3ni Editor’s Note: As we near the end of an eventful 2016, the SERRC will publish reflections considering broadly the immediate future of social epistemology as an intellectual and political endeavor. Please refer to:… Read More ›
How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology? A Further Reply to Kidd, Massimo Pigliucci
Author Information: Massimo Pigliucci, City College of New York, massimo@platofootnote.org Pigliucci, Massimo. “How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology? A Further Reply to Kidd.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 10-16. The PDF of the article gives… Read More ›