I am very grateful to Ann-Sophie Barwich for taking the time to comment on my work in her paper ‘Between Electrical Light Switches and Panpsychism: Scientism and the Responsibilities of the Humanities in the Twenty-First Century’ (2022; unless otherwise stated… Read More ›
science
The Beauty of Understanding: Scientific Understanding as Aesthetic Experience, Bridget Ritz and Brandon Vaidyanathan
Our standard images of science and scientists fail to portray the way in which scientists themselves experience science—as an aesthetic quest. They ignore the way in which scientists are driven by a passion for beauty and a childlike thirst to… Read More ›
Predictably Rational: A Further Response to Grundmann, Neil Levy
There’s a certain pleasure in accounts that debunk some of our most highly prized traits, especially when they’re seen to stem from science. Scientists and those who see themselves as scientifically minded often tell us that science shows that free… Read More ›
On Thinking With Catastrophic Times, Eric Kerr
Author Information: Eric Kerr, National University of Singapore, eric.kerr@nus.edu.sg. Kerr, Eric. “On Thinking With Catastrophic Times.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 1 (2019): 46-49. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-45Q Reprinted with permission from… Read More ›
The (Lack of) Evidence for the Kuhnian Image of Science, Moti Mizrahi
Author Information: Moti Mizrahi, Florida Institute of Technology, mmizrahi@fit.edu Mizrahi, Moti. “The (Lack of) Evidence for the Kuhnian Image of Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 7 (2018): 19-24. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3Z5… Read More ›
Each Kuhn Mutually Incommensurable, Amanda Bryant
Author Information: Amanda Bryant, Trent University, amandabryant@trentu.ca Bryant, Amanda. “Each Kuhn Mutually Incommensurable.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 6 (2018): 1-7. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3XM This volume is divided into four… Read More ›
Heidegger and the Sociologists: A Forced Marriage?, Raphael Sassower
Author Information: Raphael Sassower, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, rsasswe@uccs.edu Sassower, Raphael. “Heidegger and the Sociologists: A Forced Marriage?.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 5 (2018): 30-32. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3X8 … Read More ›
More in Defense of Weak Scientism, Moti Mizrahi
Author information: Moti Mizrahi, Florida Institute of Technology, mmizrahi@fit.edu Mizrahi, Moti. “More in Defense of Weak Scientism: Another Reply to Brown.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 4 (2018): 7-25. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3W1… Read More ›
Invisible Colleges 2.0: Eponymy as a Scientometric Tool, Gabriel Vélez-Cuartas
Author Information: Gabriel Vélez-Cuartas, Universidad de Antioquia, gjaime.velez@udea.edu.co Vélez-Cuartas, Gabriel. “Invisible Colleges 2.0: Eponymy as a Scientometric Tool.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 3 (2018): 5-8. Please refer to: Francisco Collazo-Reyes, Hugo García-Compeán, Miguel Ángel Pérez-Angón & Jane… Read More ›
Defending Some Objections to Moti Mizrahi’s Arguments for Weak Scientism, Part 3, Christopher Brown
Author Information: Christopher M. Brown, University of Tennessee, Martin, chrisb@utm.edu Brown, Christopher M. “Defending Some Objections to Moti Mizrahi’s Arguments for Weak Scientism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 2 (2018): 1-35. The pdf of the article gives specific page references, and… Read More ›