Author Information: Valerie Joly Chock & Jonathan Matheson, University of North Florida, n01051115@ospreys.unf.edu & j.matheson@unf.edu. Matheson, Jonathan, and Valerie Joly Chock. “Science Communication and Epistemic Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 1 (2019): 1-9. The pdf of the article gives specific… Read More ›
scientific context
Between Forteana and Skepticism, Matthew R. X. Dentith
Author Information: Matthew R. X. Dentith, Institute for Research in the Humanities, University of Bucharest, m.dentith@episto.org. Dentith, Matthew R. X. “Between Forteana and Skepticism: A Review of Bernard Wills’ Believing Weird Things.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 11 (2018):… Read More ›
Weak Scientism: The Prosecution Rests, Bernard Wills
Author Information: Bernard Wills, Sir Wilfred Grenfell College (Memorial University), bwills@grenfell.mun.ca. Wills, Bernard. “Weak Scientism: The Prosecution Rests.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 10 (2018): 31-36. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-41T On… Read More ›
The (Lack of) Evidence for the Kuhnian Image of Science, Moti Mizrahi
Author Information: Moti Mizrahi, Florida Institute of Technology, mmizrahi@fit.edu Mizrahi, Moti. “The (Lack of) Evidence for the Kuhnian Image of Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 7 (2018): 19-24. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3Z5… Read More ›
Changes in Social Epistemology, Lyudmila Markova
Author Information: Lyudmila Markova, Russian Academy of Science, markova.lyudmila2013@yandex.ru Markova, Lyudmila. “Changes in Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 7 (2018): 15-18. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3YV Scientific thinking had as its… Read More ›
Weak Scientism Defended Once More, Moti Mizrahi
Author Information: Moti Mizrahi, Florida Institute of Technology, mmizrahi@fit.edu Mizrahi, Moti. “Weak Scientism Defended Once More.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 6 (2018): 41-50. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3Yx See also: Wills, Bernard. “Why… Read More ›
Each Kuhn Mutually Incommensurable, Amanda Bryant
Author Information: Amanda Bryant, Trent University, amandabryant@trentu.ca Bryant, Amanda. “Each Kuhn Mutually Incommensurable.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 6 (2018): 1-7. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3XM This volume is divided into four… Read More ›
Is There Anything Wrong with Thomas Kuhn?, Markus Arnold
Author Information: Markus Arnold, University of Klagenfurt, markus.arnold@aau.at Arnold, Markus. “Is There Anything Wrong with Thomas Kuhn?.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 5 (2018): 42-47. The pdf of the article gives specific page references: Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3Xs Twenty-two years after his… Read More ›
More in Defense of Weak Scientism, Moti Mizrahi
Author information: Moti Mizrahi, Florida Institute of Technology, mmizrahi@fit.edu Mizrahi, Moti. “More in Defense of Weak Scientism: Another Reply to Brown.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 4 (2018): 7-25. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3W1… Read More ›
Susan Dieleman. The ‘Scientific Context’ in an ‘Innovation Economy’
Author Information: Susan Dieleman, Ryerson University, susan.dieleman@ryerson.ca Dieleman, Susan. 2012. ” The ‘Scientific Context’ in an ‘Innovation Economy’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1(6): 1-2. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-kU Please refer to:… Read More ›