Author Information: Lyudmila A. Markova, Russian Academy of Sciences, markova.lyudmila2013@yandex.ru Markova, Lyudmila. 2013. “Are Consensus and Pluralism Compatible? A Reply to Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (7): 35-39. The PDF of the article gives specific page… Read More ›
social epistemology
Anthropology as multi-natural ontology? A response to Marianne de Laet’s “Anthropology as social epistemology”, Helene Ratner
Author Information: Helene Ratner, Copenhagen Business School, hr.lpf@cbs.dk Ratner, Helene. 2013. “Anthropology as multi-natural ontology? A response to Marianne de Laet’s ‘Anthropology as social epistemology’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (6): 5-11. The PDF of the article gives… Read More ›
Against consensus — but to what end? Reply to Riggio, Steve Fuller
Author Information: Steve Fuller, University of Warwick, Auguste Comte Chair in Social Epistemology S.W.Fuller@warwick.ac.uk, Homepage: http://bit.ly/q3GBmi Fuller, Steve. 2013. “Against consensus — but to what end? Reply to Riggio.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (3) 25-31. The PDF… Read More ›
Kasavin on Social Epistemology and Naturalism: A Critical Reply, Tom Rockmore
Author Information: Tom Rockmore, Duquesne University, Institute of Foreign Philosophy, Peking University, rockmore@duq.edu Rockmore, Tom. 2013. “Kasavin on Social Epistemology and Naturalism: A Critical Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (2): 8-11. The PDF of the article gives… Read More ›
Social Epistemology’s 25th Anniversary – The original statement of purpose from 1987 by Steve Fuller
In 2012 Social Epistemology celebrates its 25th anniversary. For this reason, we repost Steve Fuller’s original statement of purpose from 1987. Let’s revisit Social Epistemology’s initial mission after twenty-five years. SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 1987, VOL. 1, NO. 1, 1-4 Editor’s… Read More ›
A process of truth: A reply to Steve Fuller’s essay on the silver anniversary of Social Epistemology, Adam Riggio
Author Information: Adam Riggio, McMaster University, SERRC, adamriggio@gmail.com, @adamriggio Please cite as: Riggio, Adam. 2012.A process of truth: A reply to Steve Fuller’s essay on the silver anniversary of Social Epistemology. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1 (9): 46-52… Read More ›
Sandstrom, Basbøll, Craddock, Scott. Intelligent Design as Social Epistemology: Collective Judgment Forum
Author Information: Gregory Sandstrom, Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences, gregory.sandstrom@ehu.lt , Thomas Basbøll, Independent Scholar, Copenhagen, Denmark, tb.lpf@cbs.dk, Emma Craddock, University of Nottingham, emmacraddock1@googlemail.com , and Eric O. Scott, George Mason University, escott8@gmu.edu Sandstrom, Gregory, Thomas Basbøll, Emma Craddock and… Read More ›
Gregory Sandstrom. Science, Ideology and Knowledge: A Reply to “Social Epistemology Revisted”
Author Information: Gregory Sandstrom, Lithuania University of Educational Sciences, gregorisandstrom@yahoo.com Sandstrom, Gregory. 2012. ” Science, Ideology and Knowledge: A Reply to “Social Epistemology Revisted”” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1 (3): 29-34. The PDF of the article gives specific… Read More ›
Normativity and Nostalgia: A Reply to Pitt, James H. Collier
Author Information: Jim Collier, Virginia Tech, jim.collier@vt.edu Collier, Jim. 2012. “Normativity and Nostalgia: A Reply to Pitt.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1 (2): 26-34. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8A Please refer to:… Read More ›
Social Epistemology Revisited: An Interview with Steve Fuller, Elisabeth Simbürger
Author Information: Elisabeth Simbürger, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago de Chile, SERRC, elisabeth.simburger@mail.udp.cl Fuller, Steve. 2011. “Social Epistemology Revisited: An Interview with Steve Fuller”, interview by Elisabeth Simbürger. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 1 (1) November. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3Z Please refer… Read More ›