We enter this conversation precisely to continue this productive exchange on the lessons to be learned from L’Aquila, grounding our response to both DeVasto and Felbacher-Escamilla on our previous work about the same case published in 2019 in Rhetoric &… Read More ›
uncertainty
Exigency and Overflow in the L’Aquila Case, Danielle DeVasto
In “A Rational Reconstruction of the L’Aquila Case: How Non-denial Turns into Acceptance,” Christian J. Feldbacher-Escamilla (2019) revisits the L’Aquila earthquake controversy, linking public dismissal of seismic risk to scientists’ failure to explicitly reject politicians’ misstatements. This analysis stems from… Read More ›
Could It Be a Conditional? Adam Morton
Author Information: Adam Morton, University of British Columbia, adam.morton@ubc.ca. Morton, Adam. “Could It Be a Conditional?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 10 (2018): 28-30. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-41M Chris Tweedt proposes… Read More ›
Fake Barns – Fake News, Paul Faulkner
Author Information: Paul Faulkner, University of Sheffield, paul.faulkner@sheffield.ac.uk Faulkner, Paul. “Fake Barns, Fake News.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 6 (2018): 16-21. The pdf of the article gives specific page references. Shortlink: https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3Y4 The Twitter feed of Donald Trump… Read More ›
Relativism and Uncertainty – A Response to Lukes and Riggio, Mikael Stenmark
Author Information: Mikael Stenmark, Uppsala University, mikael.stenmark@teol.uu.se Stenmark, Mikael. “Relativism and Uncertainty – A Response to Lukes and Riggio.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 10-15. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink:… Read More ›