Site icon Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective

SERRC: The Ten Most Viewed Posts in 2022

The list below provides the articles, replies, reviews, and interviews most viewed during 2022. As you will see, these pieces were published at different times over the last decade.

We invite you to read a sample of the exceptional range of contributions that the SERRC receives. We hope you will join us in reading and contributing to the SERRC in 2023.

❦ Briggle, Adam. 2021. “Which Reality? Whose Truth? A Review Kathleen Stock’s Material Girls: Why Reality Matters for Feminism. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (11): 52-59.

❦ Martin, Brian. 2019. “Do We See Icons or Reality? A Review of Donald Hoffman’s The Case Against Reality. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (12): 13-24.

❦ Mason, Elinor. 2021. “What is Hermeneutical Injustice and Who Should We Blame?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (4): 17-22.

❦ Fuller, Steve. 2021. “Is the Metaverse the New Metaphysics?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (12): 68-72.

❦ Brown, Matthew J. 2015. “A Critical Appreciation of Ronald N. Giere’s ‘Distributed Cognition without Distributed Knowing’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4 (6): 45-51.

❦ Tyson, Charlie and Naomi Oreskes. 2020. “The American University, the Politics of Professors and the Narrative of ‘Liberal Bias’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (8): 14-32.

❦ Fuller, Steve. 2013. “What Does It Mean to be an Intellectual Today? An Interview with Steve Fuller by Filip Šimetin Šegvić.” Social Epismtemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (10): 12-17.

❦ West, Mark D. 2021. “Gaia and COVID: A Review of Bruno Latour’s After Lockdown. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (12): 36-43.

❦ Radenović, Ljiljana. 2022. “Misunderstanding the Human and the Divine.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (7): 9-14

❦ Rosenberg, Alex. 2020. “Scientism Versus the Theory of Mind.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (1): 48-57.

Exit mobile version