The work of a philosopher of science, just as any other cognitive and social activity, can and should be accompanied by reflexivity. This accompaniment provides an opportunity to think oneself in the place of the Other, to step constructively beyond… Read More ›
Ilya Kasavin
Is Science to be Understood as an Independent Value? A Reply to Mark Erickson, Ilya Kasavin
In my paper (Kasavin 2020), I responded to the question “what is the value of science” in the way that invites further clarification. I assume that the value of science is its special epistemological status. Yet, this value is not justified by… Read More ›
Afterword on Social Epistemology’s Special Issue on 100 Years of Max Weber’s ‘Science as a Vocation’, Mark Erickson
Max Weber’s ‘Science as a Vocation’ caused considerable controversy in the early 1920s across German academe. Significant critics weighed in on all sides including Ernst Curtius, a leading philologist, philosopher Heinrich Rickert (a close personal friend of the Webers), Arthur… Read More ›
The Place of the Notion of the Weird in Today’s Thinking, Lyudmila Markova
Author Information: Lyudmila Markova, Russian Academy of Sciences, l.a.markova@yandex.ru. Markova, Lyudmila. “The Place of the Notion of the Weird in Today’s Thinking.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 5 (2019): 48-51. The pdf of the article gives specific… Read More ›
Why so Romantic and A Priori? A Reply to Bakhurst and Sismondo, Ilya Kasavin
Author Information: Ilya Kasavin, Russian Academy of Science, itkasavin@gmail.com Kasavin, Ilya. “Why so Romantic and A Priori? A Reply to Bakhurst and Sismondo.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 20-22. The PDF of the article gives… Read More ›
Commentary on Ilya Kasavin’s “Towards a Social Philosophy of Science: Russian Prospects”, David Bakhurst and Sergio Sismondo
Author Information: David Bakhurst and Sergio Sismondo, Queen’s University at Kingston, bakhurst@queensu.ca; sismondo@queensu.ca Bakhurst, David and Sergio Sismondo. “Commentary on Ilya Kasavin’s ‘Towards a Social Philosophy of Science: Russian Prospects’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 4 (2017):… Read More ›
A Brief Comment on the Moodey – Collins Exchange on Knowledge, Ilya Kasavin
Author Information: Ilya Kasavin, Russian Academy of Sciences, itkasavin@gmail.com Kasavin, Ilya. “A Brief Comment on the Moodey – Collins Exchange on Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 18. The PDF of the article gives specific… Read More ›
Reply to Rom Harré, Ilya Kasavin
Author Information: Ilya Kasavin, Russian Academy of Sciences, itkasavin@gmail.com Kasavin, Ilya. “Reply to Rom Harré.”Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 34-37. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-1Zh Please refer to: Kasavin,… Read More ›
A Reply to Kasavin’s ‘Philosophical Realism’, Rom Harré
Author Information: Rom Harré, Georgetown University, harre@georgetown.edu Harré, Rom. “A Reply to Kasavin’s ‘Philosophical Realism’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 21-25. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-1Yr Please refer to:… Read More ›
Context and Naturalism in Social Epistemology, Lyudmila A. Markova
Author Information: Lyudmila A. Markova, Russian Academy of Sciences, Markova.lyudmila2013@yandex.ru Markova, Lyudmila A. 2013.”Context and Naturalism in Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (9): 33-35. The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-XC Please… Read More ›