The Site Bibliography contains all posts on the SERRC.

| A | | B | | C | | D | | E | F | | G | | H | | I | | J | | K | | L | | M | | N | | O | | P | | Q | | R | | S | | T | | U || V | | W | | X | | Y | | Z |

A

Aagaard, Jesper. 2021 “The Passive Subject: A Phenomenological Contribution to STS.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (5): 14-19. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Pb.

Abbate, Cheryl. 2020. “Nonculpably Ignorant Meat Eaters & Epistemically Unjust Meat Producers.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (9): 46-54. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5n9.

Abbott, Gary and Steve Fuller. 2022. “Can Post-Truth Provide an Adequate Ethics for Social Epistemology? A Dialogue Between Gary Abbott and Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (9): 19-28. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-79A.

Adkins, Karen. 2023. “The Epistemology of Socializing: A Review of Kathryn Waddington’s Gossip, Organization and Work.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (6): 35–38. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7SD.

Afshari, Atoosa. 2024. “Review: The Science-Music Borderlands.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (2): 27–31. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8yH.

Agassi, Joseph. Reply to ‘The Rationality of Extremists’ by John Wettersten.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 2 (2012): 1-4.

Agassi, Joseph. 2020. Academic Agonies and How to Avoid Them: Advice to Young People on Their Way to Academic Careers. Blacksburg, VA: Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective.

Ahern-Dodson, Jennifer. “The role of community in working with faculty writers: Response to ‘The supplementary clerk’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 1-6.

Aikin, Scott F and Thomas Dabay. “Contrastivism and Individualism: A Reply to Sawyer.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 87-90.

Aikin, Scott F and Thomas Dabay. “A Further Note on Individualism and Contrastivism: Reply to Sawyer.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 1-4.

Akera, Atsushi. “An Accidental Scholar: Remarks on the Special Issue on Japanese STS.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 9 (2013): 22-26.

Aksoy, Faruk. 2020. “Rational Voting in European Parliament Elections: A Critical Reply to Wolkenstein.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (4): 10-15. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4WO.

Aksoy, Faruk. 2020. “Further Remarks on ‘Epistemic Barriers to Rational Voting: The Case of European Parliament Elections’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (9): 40-45. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5mm.

Alcón, Chema Sánchez. 2022. “The Fly is Trapped Inside the Bottle: A Semiotic and Epistemological Critique of the Idea of Disability.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (3): 45-51. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6CL.

Alex, Jensen, Valerie Joly Chock, Kyle Mallard, and Jonathan Matheson. “A Review of Linda Zagzebski’s Epistemic Authority.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 29-34.

Alex, Jensen, Valerie Joly Chock, Kyle Mallard, and Jonathan Matheson. “Conscientiousness and Other Problems: A Reply to Zagzabski.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 1 (2018): 10-13.

Alfano, Mark. “Becoming Less Unreasonable: A Reply to Sherman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 59-62

Alfano, Mark and Colin Klein.”Trust in a Social and Digital World.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 1-8. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4tk.

Allwood, Carl Martin. “On the virtues of an empirically oriented culture concept and on the limitations of too general and abstract characterizations of understanding.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 6 (2012): 21-26.

Allwood, Carl Martin. “The Role of Culture and Understanding in Research.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 5 (2013): 1-11.

Allwood, Carl Martin. “On the Virtues of an Empirically Oriented Culture Concept and on the Limitations of Too General and Abstract Characterizations of Understanding.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 54-61.

Allwood, Carl Martin. “On the Issue of an Appropriate Culture Concept for the Indigenous Psychologies and on the Limits of Philosophy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 41-48.

Allwood, Carl Martin. “What Type of Culture Concept Will Help the Indigenous Psychologies and Why? An Answer to Hwang.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 44-49.

Allwood, Carl Martin. “Culture, Language, Identity and the Properties of a Useful Culture Concept for the Indigenous Psychologies.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 30-33.

Almassi, Ben. “Comments on Tim Kenyon’s ‘Oral History and the Epistemology of Testimony’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 56-61.

Anaya-Reig, Nuria. “Implicit Theories Influencing Researchers: A Field for the Psychology of Science to Explore.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 11 (2018): 25-30.

Anaya-Reig, Nuria. “Teorías Implícitas del Investigador: Un Campo por Explorar Desde la Psicología de la Ciencia.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 11 (2018): 36-41.

Andersen, Line Edslev. “Community Beliefs and Scientific Change: Response to Gilbert.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 37-46.

Anderson, Derek. “Relevance Theory and Conceptual Competence Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 35-39.

Anderson, Derek. “Yes, There Is Such a Thing as Conceptual Competence Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 1 (2018): 26-35.

Anderson, Elizabeth. “Reply to John Christman’s Comments.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 7 (2012): 15-16.

Anderson, Warwick. “Taking Science Studies Off the Boyle.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 51-52.

Angermüller, Johannes. 2021. “Critique Equals Suffering Plus Society? Towards a New Approach to Critique.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (9): 1-5. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-63f.

Antony, Louise. “Epistemology or Politics?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 4 (2013): 16-23.

Archer, Alfred. 2024. “Review: Lisa Herzog’s Citizen Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (4): 23–29. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8I1.

Argamakova, Alexandra. “On the Technoprogressive Declaration.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 1-2.

Argamakova, Alexandra. “Social Epistemology and Its Ways of Setting Policy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2014): 5-8.

Argamakova, Alexandra A. 2020. “What is Right and Wrong with Social Engineering?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (12): 40-50. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Cg.

Arman, Sam. 2020. “The Context of the Current Conflict Between Iran and the US.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (3): 13-17. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Sy.

Armstrong, Stuart. “Response to the Unilateralist’s Curse.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 33-36.

Arnold, Markus. “Is There Anything Wrong with Thomas Kuhn?.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 5 (2018): 42-47.

Astola, Mandi. 2021. “Do Collective Epistemic Virtues have to be Scaled-Up Individual Virtues?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (7): 40-47. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-62a.

Atkins, J. Spencer. 2023. “Defending Wokeness: A Response to Davidson.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (6): 21–26. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7RO.

Axtell, Guy. “The ‘Dialectics of Objectivity’?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, No. 7 (2014): 5-7.

Axtell, Guy. A Post-Humanist Paradox? Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 66-68.

Azadegan, Ebrahim. “Islamic Science: A Missed Subject in Bigliardi’s Monograph?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 12-15.

Azeri, Siyaves. 2021. “On Reality of Thinking: A Response to Chris Drain’s ‘Ideality and Cognitive Development’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (1): 22-28. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5BO.

B

Bacevic, Jana. “Solving the Democratic Problem.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 50-52.

Badano, Gabriele. 2019. “Science, State Neutrality, and the Neutrality of Philosophy: A Reply to Bellolio.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (8): 29-31. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4jI.

Badino, Massimiliano. 2024. “Putting Hate Speech at Its Place: A Political-Epistemological Perspective.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (2): 47–55. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8Ag.

Bagg, Samuel. 2021. “Reply to Cyril Hédoin’s ‘The “Epistemic Critique” of Epistocracy and Its Inadequacy’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (4): 31-36. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5MR.

Bailey, Alison. “The Unlevel Knowing Field: An Engagement with Dotson’s Third-Order Epistemic Oppression.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 62-68.

Baker, Erik and Naomi Oreskes. “It’s No Game: Post-Truth and the Obligations of Science Studies.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 8 (2017): 1-10.

Baker, Erik and Naomi Oreskes. “Science as a Game, Marketplace or Both: A Reply to Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 65-69.

Bakhurst, David and Sergio Sismondo. “Commentary on Ilya Kasavin’s ‘Towards a Social Philosophy of Science: Russian Prospects’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 4 (2017): 20-23.

Balla, Bonaventure. 2022. “The Quest for Truth in the Twenty-First Century: A Reflection on the Ideal Epistemological Paradigm.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (3): 13-31. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Ao.

Balla, Bonaventure. 2023. “Science and Art: An Epistemological Analysis.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (2): 17-26. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7AQ.

Bammer, Gabriele. “Interdisciplining Knowledge or Disciplining Interdisciplinarity? A Reply to Huutoniemi’s “’Interdisciplinarity as Academic Accountability.'” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 1-4.

Barman, Dhritiman. 2023. “Critiquing the Social Construction of Technology: Now Redundant?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (3): 1-4. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Df.

Barr, Kelli and Wenlong Lu. “Re-engineering Ethics: Pushing Philosophy Outside of its Comfort Zone at the APPE Annual Meeting.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 4 (2013): 24-32.

Bartlett, Gary. 2022 “Children and Marginalization: Reflections on Arlene Lo’s ‘Hermeneutical Injustice and Child Victims of Abuse’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (12): 27-35. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7pr.

Bartlett, Steven James. 2022. “The Human Refusal to Look in the Mirror.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (9): 46-55. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7bm.

Bartlett, Steven James. 2023. “Rage in America: Why is this Happening?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (1): 46-60. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7xg.

Basbøll, Thomas. “Quick Reading: Organizing Intelligence.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2012).

Basbøll, Thomas.“I, Social Epistemologist.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 4 (2014): 14-15.

Basham, Lee. “The Need for Accountable Witnesses: A Reply to Dentith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 6-13.

Basham, Lee and Matthew R. X. Dentith. “Social Science’s Conspiracy-Theory Panic: Now They Want to Cure Everyone.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 10 (2016): 12-19.

Basham, Lee. “Between Two Generalisms: A Reply to Stokes.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 12 (2016): 4-12.

Basham, Lee. “Pathologizing Open Societies: A Reply to the Le Monde Social Scientists.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 59-68.

Basham, Lee. “Border Wall Post Truth: Case Study.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 40-49.

Basham, Lee. 2019. “‘They’ are Back (and still want to cure everyone): Psychologists’ Latest Bid to Curtail Public Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (7): 23-33. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4gu.

Basham, Lee. 2019. “Measuring Public Pathology: A Brief Response to Dentith on Wagner-Egger et al.’s ‘Why Conspiracy Theories are ‘Oxymorons…’,’ or ‘Just Asking Some Questions’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (8): 56-59. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4lP.

Basham, Lee. 2019. “Reply to Claus-Christian Carbon: ‘Conspiracy Theory,’ a Valid World-Shaping Scientific and Analytic Category.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (9): 62-69. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4ri.

Basham, Lee. 2022. “An Autopsy of the Origins of HIV/AIDS.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (1): 26-32 https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6sN.

Basham, Lee. 2022. “Vaccination Disasters: The People v. Adam Riggio, A Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (4): 77-89. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Kp.

Basham, Lee. 2022. “The ‘New Conspiracism’ is Not: Muirhead and Rosenblum’s A Lot of People are Saying.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (6): 21-30. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6TH.

Basham, Lee. 2022 “The Salvation of the State is in Watchfulness of the Citizens: A Reply to Ahmed Bouzid.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (6): 48-54. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6VI.

Basham, Lee. 2022. “Hill on ‘Stereotypical’ Conspiracy Theories and Cognitive Disabling Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (9): 64-74. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7cU.

Basham, Lee. 2022. “Response to Hill: Conspiracy Theorizing, Ordinary Usage and Integrity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (12): 10-19. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7oG.

Basham, Lee. 2022. “Conspiracy Theory, Personal Epistemic Crisis and Epstein: Riggio on Trying.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (12): 42-51. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7r7.

Basham, Lee. 2023. “‘Hate Speech’, Vaccines and Censor-Mindset: Is SERRC Killing Children?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (1): 22-31. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7vM.

Basham, Lee. 2023. “Review: Daisy B. Herndon’s American Nuclear Deception, Why the Port Chicago Experiment Must be Investigated.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (2): 13–16. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Ao.

Basham, Lee. 2023. “The Le Monde Declaration: Can Suppression of Conspiracy Theory be Conspiratorial?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (3): 41–49. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Gw.

Basham, Lee. 2023. “Conspiracy Theory as Public Intelligence: A Reply to Keeley.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (7): 31–39. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Y7.

Basham, Lee. 2023. “Walker and the Fiction of Conspiracy Theory as ‘Fringe’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (7): 40–47. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7YH.

Basham. Lee. 2023. “Jesse Walker’s ‘Broad Church’ of Conspiracy Theory: We’re all Paranoids.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (8): 48–53. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-827.

Bauer, Henry. “Reply to Ron Westrum.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 12 (2012): 21-23.

Bauer, Henry. “Reply to Krimsky.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 4 (2013): 13-15.

Baumann, Peter. “Nearly Solving the Problem of Nearly Convergent Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 10 (2018): 16-21.

Baumgaertner, Bert. 2019. “Groupstrapping, Bootstrapping, and Oops-strapping: A Reply to Boyd.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (6): 4-7. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4bE.

Bavli, Itai and Daniel Steel. “On Community Epistemic Capacity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 34-38.

Bazerman, Charles. 2024. “On Experts and Expertise: A Response to the Special Issue of Social Epistemology 38 (1).” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (2): 22–26. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8y8.

Beatson, Benjamin, Valerie Joly Chock, Jamie Lang, and Jonathan Matheson. 2019. “Exploring Epistemic Vices: A Review of Quassim Cassam’s Vices of the Mind.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (8): 48-55. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4lv.

Becker, Joffrey. 2022. “The Three Problems of Robots and AI.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (5): 44-49. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6OH.

Beckstein, Martin. “Traditions and True Successors: A Few Pragmatic Considerations” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 30-36.

Beckstein, Martin. “Addressing Ruben’s ‘Internal and External Perspectives’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 35-36.

Beeby, Laura. “Reply to José Medina.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 6 (2012): 27-30.

Beeby, Laura. “Collective resources and collectivity: A reply to José Medina.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 11 (2012): 12-15.

Beeghly, Erin. 2022. “The Constitutive Claim: Payoffs and Perils.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (2): 52-60. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6zh.

Beer, Francis A.and Robert Hariman. 2020. “Learning from the Pandemic: Catastrophic Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (5) 19-28. https://wp.me/P1Bfg0-4Wa.

Beisecker, Dave. “Normative Functionalism and its Pragmatist Roots.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 109-116.

Bell, Nathan M. “The Varieties of Hermeneutics and Engaging with Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 2 (2014): 38-39.

Bellolio, Cristóbal. 2019. “Quine, Science, and Political Liberalism: A Reply to Bonotti, Badano, and Gómez-Aguliar.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 134-140. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Az.

Benesch, Philip. “What’s Left of Popper?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 50-61.

Benjamin, Garfield. 2022. “Privacy Norms and Resistances Between the Performative, the Habitual and the Periperformative.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (1): 7-13. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6qX.

Benton, Ted. “Some Comments on Cruickshank and Sassower’s Democratic Problem-Solving: Dialogues in Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 60-65.

Bergamin, Joshua. “To Know and To Be: Second-Person Knowledge and the Intersubjective Self, A Reply to Talbert.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 43-47.

Bernal, Amiel. “The Epistemic Injustice Anthology: A Review of The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 11 (2017): 1-8.

Bertolotti, Tommaso “Science-Like Gossip, or Gossip-Like Science?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 15-19.

Bigliardi, Stefano. “On Harmonizing Islam and Science: A Response to Edis and a Self-Criticism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 56-68.

Bigliardi, Stefano. “Latour’s Sophistication, Science and the Qur’an as ‘Mere’ Historical Document: A Counter-Reply to Edis.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 34-35.

Bigliardi, Stefano. “Mehdi Golshani’s Philosophy, Islamic Science(s), and Judeo-Christian/Muslim Dialogue: A Reply to Azadegan.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 16-21.

Bigliardi, Stefano. “Reculer Pour Mieux Sauter! Replies to Howard and Hamza.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 30-34.

Bigliardi, Stefano. “What We Talk About When We Talk About Iʿjāz.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 38-45.

Bigliardi, Stefano. “Some Observations on Isra Yazicioglu’s Understanding the Qur’anic Miracle Stories in the Modern Age.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 13-16.

Bigliardi,Stefano. “New Religious Movements, Knowledge, and Science: Towards an Interdisciplinary Discussion.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 32-37.

Bigliardi, Stefano. “I’Jāz, Conspiracy Theories, and Ufology—Some Suggestions with a Touch of Latour.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 11 (2015): 1-7.

Bird, Alexander and James Ladyman. “Free Inquiry: The Haldane Principle and the Significance of Scientific Research.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 14-22.

Bishop, Robert C. 2019. “Scientism or Interdisciplinarity?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (12): 46-49. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4J0.

Bland, Steven.“Pragmatic vs. Dialectical Strategies for Resisting Epistemic Relativism: A Reply to Richard Fumerton.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 37-40.

Bleicher, Alena. 2021. “Epistemic Humility and the Social Relevance of Non-Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (5): 56-65. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Sy.

Bohman, James. “In defense of republican epistemology: Reply to May.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 9 (2012): 42-45.

Bollen, Caroline. 2023. “Empathy as a Virtue: A Response to Marshall.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (11): 94–100. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8jk.

Bollen, Caroline and Colin Marshall. 2024. “Empathy vs. Compassion: A Concluding Discussion.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (2): 8–11. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8×5.

Bondy, Patrick. “Knowledge and Ignorance, Theoretical and Practical.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 12 (2018): 9-14.

Bonotti, Matteo. 2019. “Response to ‘The Quinean Assumption. The Case for Science as Public Reason’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (7): 18-22. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4g1.

Bose, Lakshmi S. 2019. “Action and ‘Civil Death’ in the Securitised University: A Comment on Jana Bacevic’s ‘Knowing Neoliberalism’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (11): 59-63. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4GQ.

Bostrom, Nick. “In Defense of Posthuman Dignity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 1-10.

Boudry, Maarten and M. Giulia Napolitano. 2023. “Why We Should Stop Talking about Generalism and Particularism: Moving the Debate on Conspiracy Theories Forward.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (9): 22–26. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-866.

Bouzid, Ahmed. 2022. “A Reply to Steve Fuller’s ‘Eurasianism as the Deep History of Russia’s Discontent’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (4): 1-4. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Fs.

Bouzid, Ahmed. 2022. “Power—not Knowledge—is Power: A Tale of Two Naïvetés and the Depredations of First Amendment Fundamentalism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (5): 33-38. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Nx.

Bouzid, Ahmed. 2022. “Of Foxes and Lions.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (6): 7-10. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Sb.

Bouzid, Ahmed. 2022. “‘Post-Truth’: The Only Path Forward.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (10): 14-19. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7gh.

Bouzid, Ahmed. 2023. “24 Philosophy Professors React to ChatGPT’s Arrival.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (3): 50-65. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Hg.

Bouzid, Ahmed. 2023. “Deleuze to the Rescue.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (7): 7–12. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Vq.

Bouzid, Ahmed. 2024. “Nine Reactions to Professor Claire O. Finkelstein’s Call for Restricting Free Speech on Palestine.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (1): 43–51. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8tU.

Bowman, W. Derek. “Philosophy Hitherto: A Reply to Frodeman and Briggle.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 85-91.

Boyd, Kenneth. 2019. “Developing a Model of Groupstrapping: A Response to Baumgaertner and Nguyen.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (8): 32-39. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4k2.

Brandmayr, Federico. 2020. “Are the Experts Responsible for Bad Disaster Response? A Few Lessons for the Coronavirus Outbreak From L’Aquila.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (5): 1-8. https://wp.me/P1Bfg0-4Wa.

Brennan, Johnny. 2020. “Finding the Snark Together: A Response to Watson and Hinton.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (6): 54-59. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-58a.

Breshani, Sindi. 2020. “Inside a Game: Using Games as a Metaphor for Deconstructing the Oppressive Nature of Reality.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (1): 1-7. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Ko.

Breyman, Steve. “The Superior Lie: A Review of The Deceptive Activist.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 11 (2017): 36-38.

Brick, Shannon. 2021. “Giving, Receiving, and the Virtue of Testimonial Justice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (6): 46-50. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5WK.

Brick, Shannon. 2021. “Obligations of Intellectual Empowerment.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (9): 7-13. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-67g.

Briggle, Adam, Steve Fuller, Britt Holbrook and Veronika Lipinska. “Exchange on Holbrook and Briggle’s ‘Knowing and Acting.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 5 (2013): 38-44.

Briggle, Adam; and Robert Frodeman. “Thinking À La Carte.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 6 (2018): 8-11.

Briggle, Adam. 2019. “In Search of Terrestrials: A Review of Bruno Latour’s Down to Earth.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (8): 62-64. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4mg.

Briggle, Adam. 2021. “Which Reality? Whose Truth? A Review Kathleen Stock’s Material Girls: Why Reality Matters for Feminism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (11): 52-59. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6jf.

Broadey, Andy and Richard Hudson-Miles. 2019. “Towards a Schizoanalysis of the Contemporary University.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (12): 60-65. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4JL.

Brown, Christopher M. “Some Objections to Moti Mizrahi’s ‘What’s So Bad About Scientism?’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 8 (2017): 42-54.

Brown, Christopher M. “Defending Some Objections to Moti Mizrahi’s Arguments for Weak Scientism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 2 (2018): 1-35.

Brown, Keith Wayne, Brighton Dwinnel, Bob Frodeman, Steve Fuller, Lauren Griffith, Carl Jacob, David Silverberg, Natalie Szczechowski, Mike Watson. “A Dialogue Concerning Humanity 2.0.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 33-43.

Brown, Matthew J. “A Critical Appreciation of Ronald N. Giere’s ‘Distributed Cognition without Distributed Knowing’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 45-51.

Brown, Matthew J. 2023. “Good Science is Communist: A Reply to Bright and Heesen.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (4): 22-26. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7KD.

Browne, Craig. 2020. “A Dialogue Over Hierarchy and the Political Imaginary.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (9): 30-39. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5lS.

Brož, Luděk. “I, Too, Have a Dream … About Suicidology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 27-31.

Bruno, Michael G. and J.M. Fritzman. 2020. “Collective Belief Explicated: Replies to Wallace and Smith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (9): 15-. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5kX.

Bryant, Amanda. “Each Kuhn Mutually Incommensurable.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 6 (2018): 1-7.

Bryant, Amanda. 2020. “Some Devils in the Details: Methodological Concerns Regarding Mizrahi’s ‘The Scientism Debate’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (11): 28-37. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5vK.

Butcher, Jim. “Questioning the Epistemology of Decolonise: The Case of Geography.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 11 (2018): 12-24.

Butler, Jesse. “Knowledge and NOW: What Is the Epistemic Standing of the Present Moment?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 5-11.

Butler, Jesse. “Knowledge, Objects, and the Objective NOW.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 21-25.

Butler, Jesse. “Phenomenal Knowledge, Dualism, and Dreams.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 12-18.

C

Cabrera, Laura. “Visioneering and Our Common Future.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 1-3.

Cahill, Ann. “Difference, Beauvoir, and Irigaray: A Reply to Pohlhaus.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.2 (2014): 66-70.

Caine, Mark. “Social Epistemology, Environmentalism and a Proactionary Human Future: An Interview with Steve Fuller.” 3, no. 11 (2014): 106-121.

Campanini, Massimo. “Science and Epistemology in Medieval Islam.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 20-28.

Campos, Leo, Kendall Giles, Tiffany Smith. 2021. “Tributaries on a Heraclitian River: A Collaborative Review of Joseph Pitt’s Heraclitus Redux.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (5): 6-13. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5OA.

Carbon, Claus-Christian. “A Conspiracy Theory is Not a Theory About a Conspiracy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 6 (2018): 22-25.

Carlin, Andrew. “On the Practical Work of Citation: Foundationalism and (Inter)disciplinary Incommensurability.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 11 (2016): 28-40.

Carmona, Carla. 2021. “Extending the Limits of Epistemic Neglect.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (6): 51-57. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5X2.

Carmona, Carla. 2021. “A Further Characterization of Testimonial Void in Dialogue with Other Forms of Testimonial Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (10): 1-12. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6bJ.

Carr, Leah. “Review: Essays in Collective Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 29-32.

Carr, Leah. “Philosophy as Therapy and Philosophical Anthropology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 95-99.

Carter, J. Adam and Daniella Meehan. 2019. “Vices of Distrust.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 25-32. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4tz.

Casper, Stephen T. “The Death of the ‘Book Review’?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 4 (2013): 23-27.

Cassam, Quassim. “Stealthy Vices.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 10 (2015): 19-25.

Cassam, Quassim. “Vice Ontology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 11 (2017): 20-27.

Cassam, Quassim. 2019. “Epistemic Vices and Epistemic Ends: A Reply to Beatson, Joly Chock, Lang, and Matheson.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 118-123. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4A5.

Castellani, Tommaso, Emanuele Pontecorvo and Adriana Valente. “Epistemological Consequences of Bibliometrics: Insights from the Scientific Community.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 1-20.

Castellani, Tommaso, Emanuele Pontecorvo and Adriana Valente. “Epistemic Consequences of Bibliometric Evaluation: A Reply to Rip and Stöckelová.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 29-33.

Catala, Amandine. 2021. “Echo Chambers, Epistemic Injustice, and Ignorance.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (3): 30-37. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5JF.

Cath, Yuri. 2020. “Seumas Miller on Knowing-How and Joint Abilities.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (12): 14-21. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5yf.

Censon, Francesco. 2024. “An Interdisciplinary Drama: Conspiracist Philosophers versus Conspiring Social Scientists?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (4): 12–22. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8Hn.

Chambers, Simone. “The Epistemic Ideal of Reason-Giving in Deliberative Democracy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 59-64.

Chandler, Amy, Joe Anderson, Rebecca Helman, Sarah Huque, Emily Yue. 2022. “Reimagining Suicide Research: The Limits and Possibilities of Suicide Cultures.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (10): 20-28. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7gK.

Chebotareva, Elena E. 2020. “Enchantment vs Scientism in Contemporary Culture: A Reply to Mark Erickson.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (6): 50-53. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-57O.

Chis, Ioana Cerasella and Justin Cruickshank. “The Cost of Public Intellectuals: Reflections On Raphael Sassower’s Call for Intellectuals To Influence Elites and Their Publics.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 16-26.

Choudhury, Masudul Alam. “Islamic Political Economy: An Epistemological Approach.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 53-103.

Choudhury, Masudul Alam. “A Rejoinder to Zaman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2014): 14-15.

Chuang, Kimberly. “In defense of Elster’s mechanisms.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 9 (2012): 1-19.

Chung, Seungmi. 2019. “Warm Encouragement and Sharp Analysis for Interdisciplinary Scholars: A Review of Being an Interdisciplinary Academic.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (12): 39-42. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Iu.

Church, George. “Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going? An Interview with George Church, Ryan Cochrane.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 28-30.

Churcher, Millicent. “Adam Smith’s Sympathetic Imagination: A Reply to Lennon.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 63-68.

Cibralic, Beba. 2020. “‘Caliphate’ and the Problem of Testimony.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (12): 33-36. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5zi.

Cibralic, Beba. 2021. “Epistemic Norms and Failures of Reporting.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (5): 1-5. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5NT.

Clarke, Steve. 2023 “Two Problems with the Generalist-Particularist Distinction in the Philosophy of Conspiracy Theory and Why I am not a Generalist.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (8): 54–60. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-82u.

Clemente, Noel L. 2023. “Issues about the Paradox of Demonstrating Acts of Intellectual Humility.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (6): 27–34. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Sn.

Clough, Sharyn. “Feminist Theories of Evidence and Biomedical Research Communities: A Reply to Goldenberg.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 72-76.

Coady, David. “Critical reply to ‘Culpability for Epistemic Injustice: Deontic or Aretetic?’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 5 (2012): 3-6.

Coady, David. “Decision-making and Credibility.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 8 (2012): 13-15.

Coady, David . 2019. “The Trouble With ‘Fake News’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 40-52. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4w5.

Coady, David. 2019. “Response to Jeroen de Ridder’s ‘So What if ‘Fake News’ is Fake News?’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (12): 25-28. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4HK.

Coady, David. 2020. “Reply to Neil Levy’s ‘Is Conspiracy Theorising Irrational.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (5): 86-90. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-54n.

Coady, David. 2023. “A Reply to Hauswald’s ‘That’s Just a Conspiracy Theory’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (10): 44–46. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8aH.

Cochrane, Ryan. “Beyond the Mind-Body Stalemate: An Interview with Stuart Kauffman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 4 (2014): 7-10.

Cochrane, Ryan. “A Conversation with Henry Stapp.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 4 (2014): 11-13.

Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2020. “Review of Transhumanism, Nature, and the Ends of Science by Robert Frodeman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (5): 29-33. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-51c.

Code, Lorraine. “Review of Stuart Firestein. Ignorance: How it Drives Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 9 (2012): 53-57.

Cole, Michael and Natalia Gajdamaschko. 2022. “Re-Visiting Vygotsky’s Concept of Vrashchivanie (Ingrowing): A Focus on Metaphors.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (11): 59-68. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7n1.

Collazo Reyes, Francisco; Hugo García Compeán, Miguel Ángel Pérez-Angón, Jane Margaret-Russell,. “The Nature of the Eponym.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 6 (2018): 12-15.

Collier, James H. “Doing Social Epistemology Socially: A Report.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 1 (2011): 1-4.

Collier, James H. “Normativity and Nostalgia: A Reply to Pitt.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 2 (2012): 26-34.

Collier, James H. “Year one of the SERRC: An interval report.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 12 (2012).

Collier, James H. “Social Epistemology for the One and the Many: An Essay Review.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 8 (2018): 15-40.

Collin, Finn. “Two Kinds of Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no.8 (2013): 79-104.

Collin, Finn. 2019. “Two Kinds of Social Epistemology Revisited.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (12): 29-38. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Ie.

Collin, Finn. 2020. “Neurath’s Ship Meets Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (4): 39-50. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Yk.

Collin, Finn. 2020. “On Gunn on Boundary Work.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (10): 8-15. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5sO.

Collin, Finn. 2022. “Shahryari on Bloor and the Strong Program.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (3): 70-76. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Eo.

Collin, Finn. 2022. “Returning to Bloor and the Strong Program: A Brief Rejoinder to Shahryari.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 38-40. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-73H.

Collin, Finn and David Budtz Pedersen. “The Science of Science Policy: A Response to Jesper Eckhardt Larsen.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 1-9.

Collins, Harry. “Collectivities and Tacit Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 26-28.

Collins, Harry. “Knowledge as It Says on the Tin: Response to Moodey.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 50-51.

Collins, Michael T. 2021. “Civil Service Intelligence Ethics: A Reply to Miller’s ‘Rethinking the Just Intelligence Theory of National Security Intelligence Collection and Analysis’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (9): 51-60. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6as.

Combes, Richard E. “McCraw on the Nature of Epistemic Trust.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 76-78.

Combes, Richard. “McCraw on the Nature of Epistemic Trust—Part II.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 7-10.

Congdon, Matthew. 2021. “Trusting Oneself Through Others: El Kassar on Intellectual Self-Trust.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (1): 48-55. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5DB.

Corlett, J. Angelo. “On Searle on Human Rights, Again!” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 41-46.

Corlett, J. Angelo. “More on Searle on Human Rights.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 15-36.

Cormick, Claudio Javier. 2021. “‘You Don’t Know Where Your Interest Lies’: A Brief Reply to Professor Radi on his Remarks About Professor Córdoba and Gender Identity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (4): 7-16. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5LH.

Cormick, Claudio Javier. 2022. “Can Standpoint Epistemology Avoid Inconsistency, Circularity, and Unnecessariness? A Comment on Ashton’s Remarks about Epistemic Privilege.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (2): 29-41. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6×4.

Correia, Mara Cristina Salles and Tarcisio Zandonade. “Information as Recorded Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 13-39.

Craddock, Emma. “Reflections on the interdisciplinarity project: A response to an interview with Carl Mitcham and a keynote address by Stephen Frosh.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 1-4.

Craddock, Emma. “Dreaming the Future: What it Means to be Human.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 52-54.

Craddock, Emma. 2019. “The Uncomfortable Transformation of Discomfort in the Neoliberal Higher Education Context.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 107-110. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4ze.

Craddock, Emma. 2019. “Exploring What Spaces of Serendipity, Identity, and Success Can Teach Us: A Review of Being an Interdisciplinary Academic.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (11): 35-41. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Fr.

Craddock, Emma. 2021. “Social Conventions and Personal Confidences: Mario Luis Small’s Someone To Talk To: How Networks Matter in Practice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (8): 6-10. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-63K.

Crease, Robert P. “Response to Ginev, ‘Scrutinizing Scientism from a Hermeneutic Point of View’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 6 (2013): 18-22.

Croce, Michel. “Objective Expertise and Functionalist Constraints.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 5 (2019): 25-35.

Croker, Trevor. “A More Robust Software Ecology?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 2 (2014): 22-23.

Cruickshank, Justin. “Problem-Solving And The Social Production Of Knowledge: A Reply to Isaac Reed.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.2 (2014): 24-33.

Cruickshank, Justin. “From Ex Cathedra Legislators to Dialogic Exemplars? Popper, Rorty and the Politics and Sociology of Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 1-12.

Cruickshank, Justin. “Public Intellectuals, Education and the Need for Dissatisfaction: Comments on Raphael Sassower’s Discussion of Popper, Rorty and Democracy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 1-4.

Cruickshank, Justin. “Neoliberalism, the ‘Scientific Enterprise’ and the ‘Business of People’: Comments on the Sociology and Politics of Knowledge Production.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 53-65

Cruickshank, Justin and Ioana Cerasella Chis “Exit, Voice and Loyalty in the Public Sphere: On the Hollowing Out of Universities and the ‘Trojan Horse’ Attack on the Muslim Community in the UK.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 57-71.

Cruickshank, Justin and Ioana Cerasella Chis. “Big Data, TTIP and the Hubris of Techno-Capitalism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 45-55.

Cruickshank, Justin. “Meritocracy and Reification.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 4-19.

Cruickshank, Justin. “Reflections on Problems, Politics and Knowledge: Replies to the Discussants of Democratic Problem-Solving.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 12 (2017): 25-38.

Cruickshank, Justin. 2019. “The Feudal University in the Age of Gaming the System.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (8): 12-14. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4ix.

Cruickshank, Justin. 2022. “Exploitation and the Politics of Knowledge: A Commentary on Arboledas-Lérida’s Marxist Analysis of Science Communication.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (4): 12-25. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6G5.

Cuccio, Claire. “Report on New America Foundation event 9 October 2012.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 11 (2012): 8-9.

Cull, Matthew. 2020. “Dismissive Incomprehension Revisited: Testimonial Injustice, Saving Face, and Silence.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (2): 55-64. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4QE.

D

d’Agostini, Franca. 2021. “Alethic or Epistemic? A Reply to Lani Watson.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (11): 1-9. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6g6.

D’Agostino, Fred. “Reply to Armin Krishnan.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 2 (2013): 24-25.

D’Agostino, Fred. “How Can We Collectivize a Set of Visions about Social Epistemology?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 8 (2014): 5-9.

Dajani, Rana. “A Response to Damian Howard.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 43-44.

D’Amico, Robert. “Reply to Corlett’s ‘Searle on Human Rights.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 30-36.

D’Amico, Robert. “Arguments Concerning Ethical Realism and Rights: A Further Reply to Corlett.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 50-51.

Damore, Matthew. 2020. “Weak Scientism and Triviality: A Response to Moti Mizrahi.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (3): 1-8. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Rp.

Daneshgar, Majid. “Tantāwī: Western -Eastern Discoveries Embedded in Islam.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.12 (2014): 113-115.

Dastmalchian, Amir. “Islam, Science, and Cognitive-Propositionalism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 122-127.

Daukas, Nancy. “Comments on Karen Jones, ‘The Politics of Intellectual Self-Trust.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 6 (2012): 31-35.

Davidson, Lacey J. and Daniel R. Kelly. “Intuition, Judgment, and the Space Between: A Reply to Sherman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 11 (2015): 15-20.

Davidson, Lacey J. “The Scope of Woke: A Reply to Atkins.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (4): 16–21. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Kj.

Davis, Denise L. and Raphael Sassower. 2020. “The Academy Under Siege.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (4): 7-9. https://social-epistemology.com/in-and-beyond-the-era-of-covid-19/#siege.

Davis, William. “Interdisciplinarity and Pedagogy: Disciplining Collaboration in Academia. An Interview with Carl Mitcham.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2012).

Davis, William. “Philosophy of Technology Un-Disciplined.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 12-13.

Davis, William. “Moving Beyond the Human: Posthumanism, Transhumanism and Objects.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 9-14.

Davis, William. “Crisis. Reform. Repeat.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 10 (2018): 37-44.

Davis, William. 2019. “A Gathering Crowd: Collective Intelligence and Medicine.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (11): 1-7. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4D7.

Davis, William, Susan Dieleman, Robert Frodeman, Francis Remedios, Adam Riggio, Elisabeth Simbürger, Todd Suomela. “Sustainable Knowledge: An Exchange.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 4 (2014): 11-20.

Davis, William, Martin Evenden, Gregory Sandstrom and Aliaksandr Puptsau. “Are MOOCs the Future of Higher Education? A Collective Judgment Forum.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 23-27.

De Caro, Mario. “Free Will as an Illusion: Ethical and Epistemological Consequences of an Alleged Revolutionary Truth.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 40-50.

de Castro Moreira, Leonardo Vasconcelos. 2020. “The Elective Affinities Between Jair Bolsonaro’s Ideological Wing and Edir Macedo’s Theology: The Case of COVID-19.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (6): 34-39. https://wp.me/P1Bfg0-4Wa.

de Laat, Paul and Nicholas Munn. “Online Encyclopaedias: An Exchange.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 3 (2012): 10-13.

Delio, Ilia. 2020. “The Posthuman as Complex Dynamical Personhood: A Reply to Hyun-Shik Jun.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (4): 16-25. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4X6.

Dentith, Matthew R.X. “Treating Conspiracy Theories Seriously: A Reply to Basham on Dentith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 1-5.

Dentith, Matthew R. X. “In Defence of Particularism: A Reply to Stokes.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 11 (2016): 27-33.

Dentith, Matthew R. X. “Conspiracy Theories and Their Investigator(s).” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 4 (2017): 4-11.

Dentith, Matthew R. X. “Between Forteana and Skepticism: A Review of Bernard Wills’ Believing Weird Things.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 11 (2018): 48-52.

Dentith, Matthew R. X. “Politics, Deception, and Being Self-Deceived.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 4 (2019): 38-43.

Dentith, M R. X. 2019. “The Iniquity of the Conspiracy Inquirers.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (8): 1-11. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4hQ.

Dentith, M R. X. 2022. “Avoiding the Stereotyping of the Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories: A Reply to Hill.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 41-49. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-74c.

Dentith, Matthew R. X. and Martin Orr. “Clearing Up Some Conceptual Confusions About Conspiracy Theory Theorising.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 1 (2017): 9-16.

de Ridder, Jeroen. ”Science and Scientism in Popular Science Writing.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 23-39.

de Ridder, Jeroen. 2019. “Algorithm-Based Illusions of Understanding.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 53-64. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4ws.

de Ridder, Jeroen. 2019. “So What if ‘Fake News’ is Fake News?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 111-113. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4zu.

de Ridder, Jeroen. 2019. “Against Empirical-ish Philosophy: Reply to Mizrahi.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (12): 8-12. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Hc.

Desmond, Hugh. 2023. “Expanding on Status Distrust.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (2): 5–12. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7zQ.

DeVasto, Danielle. “Matters of Concern and the Politics of Who: A Response to Herndl.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 14-17.

DeVasto, Danielle. 2020. “Exigency and Overflow in the L’Aquila Case.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (1): 8-11. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4KL.

deVries, Willem A. “Sellars, Realism and Kanitan Thinking.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 57-67.

Dew, Kevin. “Public Health and the Necessary Limits of Advocacy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 26-29.

Dieguez, Sebastian, Gérald Bronner, Véronique Campion-Vincent, Sylvain Delouvée, Nicolas Gauvrit, Anthony Lantian & Pascal Wagner-Egger. “’They’ Respond: Comments on Basham et al.’s ‘Social Science’s Conspiracy-Theory Panic: Now They Want to Cure Everyone’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 12 (2016): 20-39.

Diehl, Paula. 2020. “Democracy, Its Contradictions, and the Political Imaginary.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (8): 71-78. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5jF.

Dieleman, Susan. “Review Essay of ‘Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance.’ and ‘Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 2 (2012): 11-25.

Dieleman, Susan. “The ‘Scientific Context’ in an ‘Innovation Economy.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 6 (2012): 1-2.

Dieleman, Susan. “Social Epistemology as Public Philosophy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 69-71.

Dieleman, Susan. “Against Ideal Theory Ignorance.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9, no. 5 (2019): 11-15.

Dieterle, J.M. 2023. “Epistemic Failures and Animal Suffering: A Reply to Podosky.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (12): 15–21. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8nN.

DiMoia, John P. 2022. “The Spaces of Science: Post-Colonial Design, Communication, and Enhancing Practice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (7): 40-48. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-70m.

Doja, Albert. “Social Morphodynamics: Mapping Identity Transformations, Cultural Encounters, and the Evolution of Core Values.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 1 (2018): 14-25.

Dokko, Misun. 2021. “‘What More Am I to Do?’ A Review of Bernard E. Harcourt’s Critique & Praxis: A Critical Philosophy of Illusions, Values, and Action.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective</em 10 (2): 14-20. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5G8.

Domingues, José Maurício. 2020. “Further Remarks on the Imaginary.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (7): 29-35. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5dh.

Dotson, Kristie. “Abolishing Jane Crow.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 7 (2018): 1-8.

Douglas, Conor M.W. “Response to Leonie van Drooge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 103-105.

Dragos, Chris. “Justified Group Belief in Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 6-12.

Drain, Chris. 2020. “Ideality and Cognitive Development: Further Comments on Azeri’s ‘The Match of Ideals’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (11): 15-27. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5vj.

Drain, Chris. 2021.“Commands and Collaboration in the Origin of Human Thinking: A Response to Azeri’s ‘On Reality of Thinking’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (3): 6-14. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Ij.

Drain, Chris. 2021. “Tomasello, Vygotsky, and the Phylogenesis of Mind: A Reply to Potapov’s ‘Objectification and the Labour of the Negative in the Origin of Human Thinking’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (6): 26-35. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5VG.

Duetz, J.C.M. and M R.X. Dentith. 2022. “Reconciling Conceptual Confusions in the Le Monde Debate on Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (10): 40-50. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7il.

Dufour, Monique, Gregory Sandstrom and Adam Riggio. “Beyond Polemic, Part, III.” Review of The Science Delusion, by Curtis White. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 22-28.

Dunleavy, Daniel J. 2023. “Is Academic Research Sufficiently Communist? A Comment on Bright and Heesen.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (8): 42–47. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-81J.

DuPont, Quinn. 2023. “On the Limits of the Imaginary: A Reply to Jacobetty and Orton-Johnson’s ‘Blockchain Imaginaries and Their Metaphors’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (2): 53-56. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7CK.

Dusek, Val. “Review of Dissent on Descent by Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 3 (2012): 35-45.

Dusek, Val. “Regarding Alternative Scientific Theories: A Reply to Pigliucci.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 10-14.

Dusek, Val. “Antidotes to Provincialism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 5 (2018): 5-11.

E

Earle, Joshua. “Visioneering a Better Future: The Hieroglyph Project, STS, and the Future of Science and Technology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 67-83.

Earle, Joshua. “Deleting the Instrument Clause: Technology as Praxis.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 10 (2018): 59-62.

Earle, Joshua. 2021. “On Academic Elitism, Implicit Racism, and Social Media.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (5): 66-75. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5T3.

Earle, Joshua. 2022. “Deadnames and Missing Chiralities: A Response to Steve Fuller’s ‘The Problem of Cishumanism’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (3): 52-60. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6D8.

Edis, Taner. “On Harmonizing Religion and Science: A Reply to Bigliardi.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.2 (2014): 40-43.

Edis, Taner. “An Invitation to Science?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 8 (2014): 3-4.

Edis, Taner. 2023. “What Does Theology about Science and Religion Accomplish? A Reply to Zacky and Moniruzzaman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (10): 59–64. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8cf.

Edwards, Duane C. 2019. “The Unfinished Genesis of Literary Radicalism: A Response to Clevis Headley and Melanie Otto.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 141-145. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4BD.

Egert, Philip R. “A conversation with David Hess about ‘Neoliberalism and the History of STS Theory’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 7-12.

Eglash, Ron. “On Intellectual Courage and Accountability.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 21-25.

Elías, Carol Pérez and Jesús Zamora Bonilla. “From Science in the Papers to Science in the News.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 55-66.

Ellis, David. 2021. “Faith Seeking Understanding: A Reply to Radenovic’s ‘Philosophy of my Faith’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (12): 1-7. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6jW.

El Kassar, Nadja. “The Irreducibility of Ignorance: A Reply to Peels.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 2 (2019): 31-38.

El Kassar, Nadja. “A Critical Catalogue of Ignorance: A Reply to Patrick Bondy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 2 (2019): 49-51.

El Kassar, Nadja. 2021. “A Dialogue on Intellectual Self-Trust: Replies to Congdon and Koskinen.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (6): 70-73. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Yc.

El Kassar, Nadja. 2021. “The Affective Component of Intellectual Self-Trust: A Reply to Jones.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (6): 74-76. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Yw.

Elqayam, Shira. “Instrumental Bounded and Grounded Rationality: Comments on Lockie.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 11 (2015): 47-51.

Elzinga, Benjamin. 2021. “Echo Chambers and Crisis Epistemology: A Reply to Santos.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (1): 41-47. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Dm.

Erickson, Mark. 2020. “Afterword on Social Epistemology’s Special Issue on 100 Years of Max Weber’s ‘Science as a Vocation’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (3): 18-24. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4T1.

Evans, Dylan. “Review of, and Exchange on, Fuller and Lipińska.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 84-89.

Eve, Martin Paul. 2020. “Open Access and Neoliberalism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (1): 22-26. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Lv.

Evenden, Martin. “Metaphor and Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 37-40.

F

Fagan, Melinda. “Social Mechanisms and Explanatory Pluralism: Reflections on the Persson-Little-Chuang Debate.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 6-11.

Fagan, Melinda. “Collective Vision of Objects of Inquiry: Some Preliminary Thoughts.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 27-29.

Falbo, Arianna. “Spitting Out the Kool-Aid: A Review of Kate Manne’s Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 8 (2018): 12-17.

Fantl, Jeremy. “Interest-Relativity and Testimony.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 11 (2015): 40-46.

Fantl, Jeremy. 2023. “Strongly Held Belief and Open-Mindedness: A Response to Vavova’s “Open-Mindedness, Rational Confidence, and Belief Change.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (4): 4–9. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7J1.

Farina, Mirko. “Exploring the Concepts of Science in 166 Pages: Reviewing Nigel Sanitt.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 4 (2019): 28-33.

Faulkner, Paul. “Trust and the Assessment of Credibility.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 8 (2012): 1-6.

Faulkner, Paul. “Two-Stage Reliabilism, Virtue Reliabilism, Dualism and the Problem of Sufficiency.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 121-138.

Faulkner, Paul. “Fake Barns, Fake News.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 6 (2018): 16-21.

Feldbacher-Escamilla, Christian J. 2020. “Overflow, Expertise, and the L’Aquila Case.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (3): 25-33. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4TD.

Fellows, Jennifer Jill. “Eddies and Currents: A Reply to Sassower.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 29-37.

Figueroa, Felipe. 2023. “The Political Sins of Cybernetics: A Review of Evgeny Morozov’s The Santiago Boys.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (8): 33–41. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-81l.

Fischer, Bob. 2020. “Are Meat-Eaters Epistemically Unlucky?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (9): 10-14. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5kC.

Fitzpatrick, Scott, Claire Hooker and Ian Kerridge “‘Suicidology as a Social Practice’: A Reply to Tom Widger.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 44-48.

Fowler, Bridget. “Jeremy Lane’s Comments on the Bourdieu and Language Debate: A Brief Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 1-4.

Fox, Alice. 2020. “Talking Strategy: Conceptualizing Resistance in Oppressive Systems Through Play.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (5): 68-74. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-53h.

Freedman, Karyn L. “Group Accountability Versus Justified Belief: A Reply to Kukla.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 6-12.

Freiman, Ori. 2019. “The Philosophy of Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (9): 51-61. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4qJ.

Fricker, Miranda. “How is hermeneutical injustice related to ‘white ignorance’? Reply to José Medina’s ‘Hermeneutical Injustice and Polyphonic Contextualism: Social Silences and Shared Hermeneutical Responsibilities’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 49-53.

Fried, Samantha Jo. 2019. “Collaborative Review Part 2: What Makes Interdisciplinarity Unique?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (9): 73-76. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4s4.

Fritts, Megan. 2023. “Echo Chambers and Social Media: On the Possibility of a Tax Incentive Solution.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (7): 13–19. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7W2.

Frodeman, Maya. “A Challenge for Frodeman and Briggle.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 30-33.

Frodeman, Robert. “Evaluating the Profession of Philosophy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 23-25.

Frodeman, Robert. “Anti-Fuller: Transhumanism and the Proactionary Imperative.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 38-43.

Frodeman, Robert. “Socratics and Anti-Socratics: The Status of Expertise.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 42-44.

Frodeman, Robert. “The Politics of AI.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 1 (2018): 48-49.

Frodeman, Robert. 2020.“Response to Mark Coeckelbergh’s Review of Transhumanism, Nature, and the Ends of Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (6): 15-18. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-55B.

Frodeman, Robert. 2021. “Bears as Neighbors.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (5): 25-27. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5QC.

Frohock, Richard and Eric Winsberg. 2022. “Expert Opinion, Social Robustness, and COVID-19: A Response to Yu.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (9): 1-6. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-78e.

Frosh, Stephen. “Falling into the Gaps.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 2 (2013): 12-15.

Frye, Brian L. 2022. “A Cento on Plagiarism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (7): 58-60. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-71l.

Fuller, Steve. “Christmas Greetings.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2012).

Fuller, Steve. “Against consensus — but to what end? Reply to Riggio.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 3 (2013): 25-31.

Fuller, Steve. “The Origin and Prospect of a Principled Future: An Interview with Steve Fuller, Ryan Cochrane.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 6 (2013): 12-17.

Fuller, Steve. “World Enough and Time.” Review of Time Reborn: From the Crisis in Physics to the Future of the Universe, by Lee Smolin. Social Epismteology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 12-13.

Fuller, Steve. “Intellectuals as both Dangerous and Endangered.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 18-20.

Fuller, Steve. “What Does It Mean to be an Intellectual Today? An Interview with Steve Fuller by Filip Šimetin Šegvić.” Social Epismtemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 12-17.

Fuller, Steve. “Christmas Greetings 2013.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2013).

Fuller, Steve. “‘Personhood Beyond the Human’: Reflections on an Important Conference.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 2 (2014): 1-11.

Fuller, Steve. “Towards a Proactionary Welfare State.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.5 (2014): 82-84.

Fuller, Steve. “Social Epistemology: The Future of an Unfulfilled Promise.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 29-37.

Fuller, Steve. “Science Without Expertise: Defending My Defence of Intelligent Design (Nearly) a Decade Later.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 22-29.

Fuller, Steve. “Why Superintelligence May Not Help Us Think about Existential Risks—or Transhumanism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 47-49.

Fuller, Steve. “Who Needs the Science Wars When You’ve Got This on the Homefront?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 40-42

Fuller, Steve and Veronika Lipinska. “Transhumanism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 25-29.

Fuller, Steve. “My One Habit: Never Speak from a Prepared Written Text.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 10-13.

Fuller, Steve. “A Robust Challenge to the Value of a University Education.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 10-11.

Fuller, Steve. “Markets as Educators, or Have We Always Been Neo-Liberal?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 29-30.

Fuller, Steve. “‘Is Science Out of Control?’ A Failed Book Proposal.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 48-51.

Fuller, Steve. Interview with Mike Neary. “What’s Left of the Academy? Leadership, Intellectuality and the Prospects for Mass Change.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 22-25.

Fuller, Steve. “Prolegomena to the Deep Sociology of Brexit: The Long Road Back to Pareto.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 1-5.

Fuller, Steve. “Counterfactuals in the White House:  A Glimpse into Our Post-Truth Times.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 1-3.

Fuller, Steve. “What are You Playing At? On the Use and Abuse of Games in STS.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 39-49.

Fuller, Steve. “How to Study: Roam, Record and Rehearse.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 62-64.

Fuller, Steve. “Veritism as Fake Philosophy: Reply to Baker and Oreskes.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 47-51.

Fuller, Steve. “Against Virtue and For Modernity: Rebooting the Modern Left.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 12 (2017): 51-53.

Fuller, Steve. “‘China’ As the West’s Other in World Philosophy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 11 (2018): 1-11.

Fuller, Steve. “Staying Human in the 21^st Century Is Harder Than You Might Think.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 12 (2018): 39-42.

Fuller, Steve. 2019. “Preface to the Chinese Edition of Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, (6): 38-43. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4dU.

Fuller, Steve. 2019. “From Transcendental Dopes to Transhumanists: Prolegomena to a Futurist Take on the History and Philosophy of Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (9): 19-24. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4oz.

Fuller, Steve. 2019. “The Fork in the Road for the Future of Humanity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective YouTube video, 16:03. 25 September. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4yJ.

Fuller, Steve. 2019. “Social Epistemology at the Dawn of a New Decade.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (12): 66-71. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4K3.

Fuller, Steve. 2020. “The Emergence of Civil Libertarian Science in Pandemic Times.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (12): 10-13. https://wp.me/P1Bfg0-4Wa.

Fuller, Steve. 2020. “We are the Fallen Riding the Tiger of World-History: Christmas in the Post-Truth Condition.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (12): 28-32. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5yM.

Fuller, Steve. 2021. “The Individual as Elusive Quarry in the History of Philosophy: A Response to Radenovic.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (8): 30-35. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-64U.

Fuller, Steve. 2022. “The Problem of Cishumanity: Towards a Genealogy of ‘Trans’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (2): 1-5. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6uS.

Fuller, Steve. 2022. “Transhumanism in the Schools Redux.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (2): 19-21. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6w8.

Fuller, Steve 2022. “Seven Heresies.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (2): 49-51. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6yF.

Fuller, Steve. 2022. “Digital Clones as the Epitome of Life as a Work of Art.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (3): 36-37. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6BW.

Fuller, Steve. 2022. “The Academy: From Divinity to Bovinity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (6): 18-20. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Tg.

Fuller, Steve. 2022. “How to Think Like God: A Swedish Twitter University Course.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 90-92. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-76T.

Fuller, Steve. 2022. “Introduction to the Turkish Translation of Post-Truth: Knowledge As A Power Game.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (11): 69-71. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7nz.

Fuller, Steve. 2022. “Apocalypse Now? Yes, but Keep Calm and Carry On.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (12): 61-67. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7sF.

Fuller, Steve. 2023. “Introduction to Defining Science: William Whewell, Natural Knowledge and Public Debate in Early Victorian Britain by Richard Yeo.” Translated into Chinese by Yao Yaxin. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (8): 12–20. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-80o.

Fuller, Steve. 2023. “Introduction to the Farsi Translation of Kuhn vs. Popper.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (9): 15–21. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-85i.

Fuller, Steve. 2023. “Thinking of Kant Just Before his Tercentenary.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (12): 22–24. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8ol.

Fumerton, Richard. “Fundamental vs. Derivative; Useful vs. Useless: A Response to Bland.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 56-59.

G

Gahrn-Andersen, Rasmus. 2024 “Coming to Know Through Social Organizing.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (1): 22–25. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8s5.

Gallois, Cindy. “Social Licence to Operate as Intergroup Communication: A Comment on the Special Issue Edited by Rooney, Leach, and Ashworth.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 51-54.

García, Eric Bayruns. 2021. “On Anticipatory-Epistemic Injustice and the Distinctness of Epistemic-Injustice Phenomena.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (7): 48-57. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-62r.

García, Eric Bayruns. 2022. “Testimonial Smothering’s Non-Epistemic Motives: A Reply to Goetze and Lee.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (1): 18-20. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6rH.

Garland, Christian. 2020. “‘Changing Behaviour:’ The Hierarchical and Bureaucratic Imperative of Instrumental Reason in the Corporatized University.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (6): 30-33. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-56O.

Garson, Justin. “Realism, Conventionalism, and Irrealism about Biological Functions: A Reply to Schyfter.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 77-81.

Gasparatou, Renia. 2023. “On Scientism’s Merry-Go-Round.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (5): 58–62. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7OR.

Gaudet, Joanne. “Absence and Presence in Science: Critical Reply to the Special Issue on ‘Absences’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 4 (2014): 16-23.

Gelfert, Axel. “Symbol Systems as Collective Representational Resources: Mary Hesse, Nelson Goodman, and the Problem of Scientific Representation.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 52-61.

Gibbons, Adam. 2022. “On Epistocracy’s Epistemic Problem: Reply to Méndez.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 1-7. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-722.

Gilbert, Margaret. “Scientists Are People Too: Comment on Andersen.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 45-49.

Giles, Kendall. 2020. “Reflections on Academic Agonies and How to Avoid Them by Joseph Agassi.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (12): 37-39. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5zB.

Gilks, Mark. 2022. “The Pride and Shame of Being a Soldier.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (4): 5-11. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6FH.

Gille, Zsuzsa. “Is there an emancipatory ontology of matter? A response to Myra Hird.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 4 (2013): 1-6.

Gillett, Tertia. 2023. “Are We Wiser Together? A Review of Cizek and Uricchio’s Collective Wisdom: Co-Creating Media for Equity and Justice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (9): 1–5. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-849.

Ginev, Dimitri. “Reply to Robert Crease.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 9 (2013): 27-32.

Goetze, Trystan S. 2021. “Anticipation, Smothering, and Education: A Reply to Lee and Bayruns García on Anticipatory Epistemic Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (9): 36-43. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-69w.

Goff, Philip. 2023. “Science vs. Scientism in Consciousness Research: A Reply to Ann-Sophie Barwich.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (7): 23–30. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Xv.

Goldberg, Sanford C. “‘Analytic Social Epistemology’ and the Epistemic Significance of Other Minds.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 26-48.

Goldberg, Sanford C. “Diversity in Epistemic Communities: A Response to Clough.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 25-30.

Goldenberg, Maya J. “Diversity in Epistemic Communities: A Response to Clough.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 25-30.

Golshani, Mehdi. “Some Clarifications Concerning My Views about Science and Religion.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 90-91.

Gómez-Aguliar, Ivan E. 2019. “Experts, Citizens, and Evidence: Who Manages What?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (8): 40-42. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4kT.

Gonnerman, Chad and Stephen Crowley. 2022. “Can We Tell Whether Philosophy is Special? ” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (11): 1-11. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7jm.

Goodrum, Matthew. 2020. “Review: How History Gets Things Wrong by Alex Rosenberg.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (5): 82-85. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-546.

Gopal, William and Federica Russo. 2022. “What Difference Does the Digital Era Make to Authority and Power Structures? A Reply to Beatriz Buarque.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (11): 12-17. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7k6.

Gordon, Chantelle. 2020. “An Interview with Steve Fuller on Conspiracy Theories and Post-Truth.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (1): 19-21. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Lk.

Gorton, William. “Popper’s Realism, the Rationality Principle and Rational Choice Theory: Discussion of “The Rationality Principle Idealized” by Boaz Miller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 3 (2012): 18-23.

Graham, Peter, Zachary Bachman, Meredith McFadden, Megan Stotts. “Epistemic Evaluations: Consequences, Costs and Benefits.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 7-13.

Gramelsberger, Gabriele. “Symbol Systems as Cognitive and Performative Hybrids: A Reply to Axel Gelfert.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 89-94.

Grammenou, Kyriaki. 2020. “Some Demarcations and a Dilemma: Comments on Mizrahi.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (5): 59-63. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-52t.

Graness, Anke. “African Philosophy and History.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 10 (2018): 45-54.

Graness, Anke. “What Is ‘Genuine’ African Philosophy? An Answer to John Lamola.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 4 (2019): 6-13.

Grundmann, Thomas 2021. “The Possibility of Epistemic Nudging: Reply to My Critics.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (12): 28-35. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6m6.

Grundmann, Reiner. “Regarding Experts and Expertise: A Reply to Szymanski.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 19-22.

Gui, Angela. “Extended Personal Identity in the 21st Century.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no 11 (2015): 8-14.

Gulick, Walter. “On Moodey’s Response with Additional Comments Toward Understanding the Tacit.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 6-11.

Gunn, Hanna Kiri. 2020. “Reflections on Boundary Work on Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (8): 1-12. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5fH.

H

Habgood-Coote, Joshua. 2021. “Caliphate and the Social Epistemology of Podcasts.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (2): 27-35. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5GY.

Hackett, Joshua. “Funes, Digitized: Borges as a Guide to Fractured Digital Identities.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 1-10.

Hagen, Kurtis. “What Are They Really Up To? Activist Social Scientists Backpedal on Conspiracy Theory Agenda.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 89-95.

Hagen, Kurtis. 2022. “Vaccination and Intellectual Honesty: Reflections on a Theme in Recent SERRC Articles.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (5): 71-79. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6QF.

Hagen, Kurtis. 2022. “A Bibliography and Brief History of the Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 27-37. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-73e.

Hagen, Kurtis. 2023. “Three Ways to Define Conspiracy Theories: A Response to Räikkä on Pejorative Definitions, Part I.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (11): 19–29. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8fK.

Hagen, Kurtis. 2023. “Implausible Conspiracy Theories: A Response to Räikkä on Pejorative Definitions, Part II.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (11): 30–41. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8gc.

Hagen, Kurtis. 2023. “Conspiracy Theories and Relevant Epistemic Authorities: A Response to Räikkä on Pejorative Definitions, Part III.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (11): 42–53. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8gL.

Haklay, Muki. 2022. “Is Convergent Realism an Appropriate Method for Evaluating Ethics?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (10): 29-34. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7hg.

Halffman, Willem and Hans Radder. “International Responses to the Academic Manifesto: Reports from 14 Countries.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective Special Report (2017): 1-77.

Hamati-Ataya, Inanna. “Before Social Epistemology: On the Limited Efficacy of ‘The Scandal’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.2 (2014): 44-48.

Hamza, Abdelhaq M. “Faith and Reason: The Re-Emergence of Neo-Mu’tazilite Thought in the Discourse of Modern Muslim Scientists.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 53-55.

Hamza, Abdelhaq M. “Whither Muslim Scholarship? A Reply to Jamal Mimouni Regarding Faith and Reason.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 73-84.

Handfield, Toby. 2020. “What Evolutionary Biology Can Tell Us About Cooperation (and Trust) in Online Networks.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (2): 11-19. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Nw.

Hänel, Hilkje C. “The Intricacies of Ideology and Ignorance: A Reply to Mason.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (7): 58-62. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-62M.

Hansson, Sven-Ove. 2022. “The Components of Stubborn Distrust.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (9): 61-63. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7cz.

Harding, Sandra. “An Organic Logic of Research: A Response to Posey and Navarro.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 22-25.

Hardison, Ayesha. “Theorizing Jane Crow, Theorizing Literary Fragments.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 2 (2018): 56-63.

Harré, Rom. “A Reply to Kasavin’s ‘Philosophical Realism’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 21-25.

Harris, Randy Allen. 2021. “X Marks the Spot: An Appreciative Response to Morales’s Review of Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science: Case Studies and Issues and Methods.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (9): 61-67. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6bp.

Harris, Randy Allen. 2022. “Everybody Stands Ready for eXcetera: Rhetoric of Science meets the Pickwick Papers; or A Humble Reply to Morales (and Gruber and Pietrucci).” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (4): 26-50. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6H0.

Hartelius, E. Johanna. 2019. “Response to Moriarty and Mehlenbacher’s ‘The Coaxing Architecture of Reddit’s r/science’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 130-133. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4AO.

Hartelius, E. Johanna and Gordon R. Mitchell. “NCA-Forum Double Session on Scholarly Metrics in a Digital Age.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 1-29.

Hashemi, Morteza. “From Ibn Khaldun’s Point of View Fidel is Not Dead: Or, What Does the Rise of The Donald Tell Us About the Future?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 12 (2016): 13-16.

Hashemi, Morteza. 2020. “Political Theology of Shi’i Transfiguration: How Qasem Soleimani Will Continue to Shape the Western Asia?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (2): 1-4. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4MJ.

Hauswald, Rico. 2024. “The Legitimacy, Epistemic Consequences, and Functions of Dismissive Conversational Exercitives: A Response to Coady.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (1): 32–35. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8t1.

Hayward, Tim. 2021. “Conceptualizing Disinformation.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (7): 10-15. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-609.

Hazan, Haim and Raquel Romberg. 2023. “‘Suicide Cultures’: A Contradiction in Terms?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (2): 1-4. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7zu.

Headley, Clevis R. 2019. “Wilson Harris, the Philosophy of History, and the Sovereignty of the Imagination: A Critical Reply to Duane Edwards.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (7): 41-46. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4hl.

Healey, Richard A. 2019. “The Aims of Reliable Knowledge: A Reply to Seungbae Park.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (9): 25-30. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4oU.

Healey, Richard A. 2019. “Four Points in Response to Seungbae Park.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (12): 43-45. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4IG.

Hédoin, Cyril. 2021. “On Justifying Epistocratic Political Institutions: A Reply to Samuel Bagg.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (6): 63-69. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5XS.

Henderson, Jen. “The gastronomy of writing: Copenhagen, Denmark October 17-20, 2012.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 12 (2012): 7-9.

Henriksen, Dorte. “Reply to Liberman and López Olmedo’s ‘Psychological Meaning of “Coauthorship” Among Scientists’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 20-22.

Herndl, Carl G. “Doing and Knowing in the L’Aquila Case.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 1-6.

Herzog, Benno. 2022. “Immanent Critique: The Role of Researchers and Participants in the Particular Universal Conundrum.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (2): 6-12. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6vb.

Hess, David. “Reply to Libby Schweber’s Comments on ‘Neoliberalism and the History of STS Theory’, David J. Hess.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, 10 (2013): 32-37.

Hewitt, Des. 2020. “Meditations on a Theme: A Review of Steve Fuller’s Nietzschean Meditations.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (3): 50-53. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4UY.

Hewitt, Des. 2020 “A Quiet Life: An Essay Inspired by Steve Fuller’s ‘When A Virus Goes Viral—Life With COVID-19’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (5): 40-45. https://wp.me/P1Bfg0-4Wa.

Hewitt, Des. 2020. “Behavioural Insights from the Pandemic: Experiencing the State’s Pseudo/Quasi Sociological Approach to Social Control and COVID-19.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (7): 45-50. https://wp.me/P1Bfg0-4Wa.

Hewitt, Des. 2020. “A Critical Review of Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game by Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (8): 47-52. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5iw.

Hewitt, Des. 2021. “Resilience.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (1): 37-40. https://wp.me/P1Bfg0-4Wa.

Hewitt, Des. 2021. “A Review of Steve Fuller’s A Player’s Guide to the Post-Truth Condition.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (5): 39-44. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Rs.

Hewitt, Des. 2021. “The Deadly Consequences of Wish Fulfilment: Anna Elisabetta Galeotti’s Political Self-Deception.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (6): 85-91. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Zc.

Hewitt, Des. 2021. “Enhancing Human Existence: Mercer and Trothen’s Religion and the Technological Future.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (8): 48-54. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-65W.

Hewitt, Des. 2021. “Towards a Knowledge Socialism: A Digital Sedition.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (10): 22-30. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6cV.

Hewitt, Des. 2022. “The Rise of the Robots: Post-Digital Being.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (5): 58-67. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Pu.

Hewitt, Des 2022. “Honesty is the Best Policy: Why the Science of Vaccination Matters.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (6): 66-76. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Wz.

Hewitt, Des. 2022. “Reflections on Scott Hill’s ‘A Revised Defence of Le Monde Group’: ‘Never Again’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (9): 7-18. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-79p.

Hewitt, Des. 2022. “Love in a Cold Climate.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (11): 49–58. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7mA.

Hewitt, Des. 2023. “A Match and Some Gasoline.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (1): 61-69. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7y2.

Hewitt, Des. 2023. “Requiem for Expertise.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (8): 1-9. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Zi.

Hewitt, Des. 2023. “‘From Divinity to Bovinity’ and the Square Route of Orthogonality: A Review of Fuller’s Back to the University’s Future.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (11): 9–18. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8eZ.

Hicks, Dan. 2022. “Young’s P-Value Plot as an Agnogenic Technique.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (3): 36-44. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Cj.

Hilgartner, Stephen. “Studying Absences of Knowledge: Difficult Subfield or Basic Sensibility?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 84-88.

Hill, Scott. 2022. “A Defense of the Le Monde Group.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (7): 1-8. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Xz.

Hill, Scott. 2022. “A Revised Defense of the Le Monde Group.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 18-26. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-72R.

Hill, Scott. 2022. “The Role of Stereotypes in Theorizing about Conspiracy Theories: A Reply to Dentith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 93-99. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-77m.

Hill, Scott. 2022. “Substantive Disagreement in the Le Monde Debate and Beyond: Replies to Duetz and Dentith, Basham, and Hewitt.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (11): 18-25 https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7kn.

Hill, Scott. 2023. “Is ‘Conspiracy Theory’ Harmful? A Reply to Foster and Ichikawa.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (9): 27–31. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-86M.

Hill, Scott. 2024. “The Dominant Ordinary Use of ‘Conspiracy Theory’ is Narrow: A Reply to Censon.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (4): 38–40. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8Ji.

Hiller, Avram and R. Wolfe Randall. 2023. “Pluralism About Group Knowledge: A Reply to Jesper Kallestrup.”^[1] Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (1): 39-45. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7wD.

Hiller, Avram and R. Wolfe Randall. 2023. “Group Dispositional Belief, Information Possession, and ‘Epistemic Explosion’: A Further Reply to Jesper Kallestrup.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (5): 14–22. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7M3.

Hinton, Martin. 2019. “There are Disagreements and Disagreements: A Reply to Wagemans.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 124-129. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Aj.

Hinton, Martin. 2020. “Can Novices be Taught to Choose Trustworthy Experts? Optimism for Reasoning—A Reply to Johnny Brennan.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (4): 65-71. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Zk.

Hird, Myra J. “Is waste indeterminacy useful? A response to Zsuzsa Gille.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 6 (2013): 28-33.

Hird, Myra J. “Planetary Messmates: Engaging with Elizabeth Mazzolini and Philip Olson on the Topic of Waste.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 52-57.

Hofmänner, Alexandra. “Science Studies Elsewhere: The Experimental Life and the Other Within.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 1-26.

Hofmänner, Alexandra. “Response to Anderson and Khandekar.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 44-52.

Holbrook, Dwight. “What is an Object?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 35-38.

Holbrook, Dwight. “Closing in on Dualism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 57-62.

Holbrook, J. Britt. “Fuller’s Categorical Imperative: The Will to Proaction.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 20-26.

Holbrook, J. Britt and Adam Briggle. “Knowing and acting: The precautionary and proactionary principles in relation to policy making.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 5 (2013): 15-37.

Holbrook, Dwight. “Coming Back to What Started It All.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 63-68.

Hopwood-Phillips, Henry. 2021. “Review of Interrogating the Germanic: A Category and its Use in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages edited by J.M Harland and M. Freidrich.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (9): 20-21. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-67T.

Howard, Damian. “Some Reflections on Stefano Bigliardi’s ‘On Harmonizing Islam and Science.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 50-52.

Huutoniemi, Katri. “On the Value of Interdisciplinary Integration: A Response to Michael O’Rourke.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 88-92.

Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. “The construction of culture-inclusive theories by multiple philosophical paradigms.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 46-58.

Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. “Science as a Culture in Culture with Deep-Structure Across Empirical Studies in Psychology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 38-51.

Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. “A Disciplinary Horizon for Comprehending the Third Wave of Psychology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 44-55.

Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. “All Roads Lead To Rome.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 56-66.

Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. “Preserving Cultural Identity and Subjectivity for a Psychology of Multiculturalism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 7-14.

Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. “Outside Observer vs. Inside Doer: Divergent Perspectives on ‘Culture’ in the Indigenization Movement of Psychology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 92-103.

I

Inglis, David. “Twisting the Stick: A Reply to Jeremy Lane.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 66-68.

Ingold, Tim. 2024. “On Being Tasked with the Problem of Inhabiting the Page.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (2): 1–7. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8wD.

Irwin, Alan. “Agreeing to Differ? A Response to Van Bouwel and Van Oudheusden.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 11-14.

Isopp, Bernhard. 2020. “The Politics of Symmetry.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (1): 12-18. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4L4.

Ivanov, Andrey. 2022. “What is to be Done with Eurasianism—or the ‘Promised Heartland’—as Someone Who is a Real Eurasian?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (6): 38-41. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Uy.

J

Jain, Pankaj. “Taking Philosophy Back: A Call From the Great Wall of China.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 9 (2018): 60-64.

Jandrić, Petar. 2020 “Corona-Party at the Ruins of an Earthquake.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (5): 34-39. https://wp.me/P1Bfg0-4Wa.

Jansen, Sue Curry. 2021. “Commentary on Brian Martin’s ‘Tactics Against Scheming Diseases’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (5): 45-51. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5RK.

Janz, Bruce. “The Problem of Method in African Philosophy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 8 (2018): 1-7.

Jaton, Florian. 2022. “Matters of Social Epistemology: A Comment on Emma Stamm’s Review.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (1): 21-25. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6sh.

Jaworski, Katrina. “Divorcing Suicidology, Ethically.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 18-25.

John, Stephen. “Transparency, Well-Ordered Science, and Paternalism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 7 (2018): 30-33.

Johnson, Kathryn, Taylor Loy, David Dansereau, Maria Gomez, George Atalla, Nataliya Brantly, and Sonja D. Schmid “One Nation Under Lockdown.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (6): 25-29. https://wp.me/P1Bfg0-4Wa.

Johnson, Nathan R. and Damien Smith Pfister. “‘Ecologizing’ Berry’s Computational Ecology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 4 (2013): 7-9.

Jones, Karen. “Reply to Nancy Daukas.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 11 (2012): 1-7.

Jones, Karen. 2021. “From Group Scaffolded Individual Self-Trust to Group Self-Trust.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (4): 1-6. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5KP.

Jones, Peter E. “Reality check: Some thoughts in response to Pablé.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 16-19.

Jones-Katz, Gregory. “On How (Not) to Turn the Senses into Food for Thought; or, When Context is King.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 1 (2011): 5-13.

Jovanovic, Franck. 2019. “Debating the Computerization of Financial Markets: A Reply to Gasparin, Schinckus, & Green.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (9): 14-18. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4of.

Jukola, Saana; and Henrik Roland Visser. “On ‘Prediction Markets for Science,’ A Reply to Thicke” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 11 (2017): 1-5.

K

Kaiser, David. “Déjà vu all over again? A response to Philip Mirowski.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 2 (2013): 1-7.

Kallestrup, Jesper. 2022. “Comments on Hiller and Randall’s ‘Epistemic Structure in Non-Summative Social Knowledge’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (11): 38-41. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7lX.

Kallestrup, Jesper. 2023. “Regarding Dispositional Belief: A Further Reply to Hiller and Randall.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (3): 15-16. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Ea.

Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang. “Collaboration, Reward and the Digital Humanities: Reply to Nyhan.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 23-26

Kamal, Abdali S. “On Bigliardi’s Islam and the Quest for Modern Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 55-56.

Kamruzzaman, Palash. 2021. “‘Epistemic Injustice’ in Aid Sector and Agenda for Researching National Development Experts.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (6): 77-84. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5YT.

Kant, Vivek. 2020. “Review of Pankaj Sekhsaria’s Instrumental Lives: An Intimate Biography of an Indian Laboratory.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (3): 9-12. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4RY.

Kasavin, Ilya. “Reply to Rockmore.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 2 (2013): 26-29.

Kasavin, Ilya. “A Further Reply to Rockmore.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 5 (2013): 12-14.

Kasavin, Ilya. “Cases of Interdisciplinarity: Between Habitus and Reflexion.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 15-30.

Kasavin, Ilya. “Reply to Rom Harré.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 34-37.

Kasavin, Ilya. “A Brief Comment on the Moodey – Collins Exchange on Tacit Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 18.

Kasavin, Ilya. “Why so Romantic and A Priori? A Reply to Bakhurst and Sismondo.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 20-22.

Kasavin, Ilya. 2020. “Is Science to be Understood as an Independent Value? A Reply to Mark Erickson” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (4): 1-2. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Vr.

Kasavin, Ilya. 2023. “Philosophy of Science and Social Activism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (4): 1–3. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Iz.

Kasprowicz, Dawid. 2022. “Maintaining Relations and Re-Engineering the Social: A Reply to Becker’s ‘The Three Problems of Robotics and AI’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 50-56. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-74G.

Kastenhofer, Karen. 2024. “The Two Cultures of Interdisciplinarity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (2): 32–36. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8z3.

Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal. “Reply to ‘What Constitutes “Good” Evidence for Public Health and Social Policy Making? From Hierarchies to Appropriateness’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 51-55.

Kaufman, Daniel A. “Philosophy’s Academic Viability: A Reply to Frodeman, Briggle and Holbrook.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 3 (2013): 1-5.

Kemp, Stephen. “On Popper, Problems and Problem-Solving: A Review of Cruickshank and Sassower’s Democratic Problem-Solving.“ Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 27-34.

Kerr, Eric. “Are You Thinking What We’re Thinking.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 5-13.

Kerr, Eric. “A Hermeneutic of Non-Western Philosophy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 4 (2018): 1-6.

Kerr, Eric. “The Social Epistemology of Book Reviews.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 12 (2018): 48-52.

Kerr, Eric. “On Thinking With Catastrophic Times.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 1 (2019): 46-49.

Khandekar, Aalok. “Lost in Nowhere.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 8-9.

Khor, Darius. 2021. “The Game and How to Play It: A Review of Fuller’s A Player’s Guide to the Post-Truth Condition.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (5): 52-55. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Sd.

Kidd, Ian James. “How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology? A Reply to Pigliucci.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 11-17.

Kidd, Ian James. “Cranks, Pluralists, and Epistemic Vices.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 7-9.

Kidd, Ian James. “Capital Epistemic Vices.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 8 (2017): 11-16.

Kidd, Ian James. 2019. “Scientism and the ‘Soul of Philosophy’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (11): 52-54. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Gf.

Kim, Kyung-Man. “Why is Epistemology Still Relevant to the Sociology of Science? Comments on Kale-Lostuvali’s ‘Two Sociologies of Science in Search of Truth’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 29-33.

Kinchy, Abby. “Explaining Absolute Absences: A Critical Reply to Scott Frickel.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 4 (2014): 24-29.

Kindi, Vasso. “The Role of Evidence in Judging Kuhn’s Model: On the Mizrahi, Patton, Marcum Exchange.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 11 (2015): 25-33.

Kirmani, M. Zaki. “The Aligarh School of Islam and Science Studies: Understanding its Background and Distinctive Features.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 10 (2015): 33-46.

Kirmani, M. Zaki “Can Science Halt Islamic Extremism?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 16-18.

Klausen, Søren Harnow. “No Cause for Epistemic Alarm: Radically Collaborative Science, Knowledge and Authorship.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 38-61.

Klausen, Søren Harnow. “New Practices, Open Questions: A Reply to Bertolotti.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 35-38.

Klijnman, Carline. 2021. “Echo Chambers, Epistemic Injustice and Anti-Intellectualism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (6): 36-45. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Wb.

Koch, Susanne. 2021. “Contextualising Epistemic Injustice in Aid: On Colliding Interests, Colonialism and Counter-Movements.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (2): 14-21. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5FQ.

Kochan, Jeff. “On the Sociology of Subjectivity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 5 (2018): 39-41.

Kochan, Jeff. “Decolonising Science in Canada: A Work in Progress.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 11 (2018): 42-47.

Kochan, Jeff. “Suppressed Subjectivity and Truncated Tradition: A Reply to Pablo Schyfter.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 12 (2018): 15-21.

Kochan, Jeff. “Disassembling the System: A Reply to Paolo Palladino and Adam Riggio.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 12 (2018): 29-38.

Koop, Gerrit. “Is Quantification the Key? A Reply to Nederbragt.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 8 (2014): 1-2.

Koskinen, Inkeri. “Not-So-Well-Designed Scientific Communities.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 54-58.

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2021. “Emancipatory Activist Movements Can Build Collective Intellectual Self-Trust—But Not Always in Ways We Would Like.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (2): 21-26. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5GD/.

Kouper, Inna. 2020. “Googling as Research: A Response to ‘(Google)-Knowing Economics’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (6): 19-24. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-567.

Kouri, Scott. “Nomad Suicidology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 66-75.

Kral, Michael J. “Critical Suicidology as an Alternative to Mainstream Revolving-Door Suicidology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 10-11.

Kravchenko, Alexander V. 2024. “How Not to Make Things with Words: Constructivist Reflections on Knowledge, Language, and World.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (1): 11–21. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8rq.

Krimsky, Sheldon. “The Organized Skepticism of Science: A Review of Bauer.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 4 (2013): 10-12.

Krishnan, Armin. “Response to Fred D’Agostino’s ‘Disciplinarity and the Growth of Knowledge.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 2 (2013): 19-23.

Krishnan, Armin. “Organizing Science: A Further Reply to Fred D’Agostino.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 3 (2013): 19-21.

Kukla, Rebecca. “Commentary on Karyn Freedman, ‘Testimony and Risk: The Dependence Account.'” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 46-52.

Kukla, Rebecca. “A Further Look at Standards of Justification.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 63-65.

Kurtulmuş, Ahmet Faik. 2022. “Science, Trust and Justice: More Lessons from the Pandemic.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (6): 11-17. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Sv.

L

Lambert, Andrew. 2020. “A Translator’s Response to Reviewers’ Comments: On Li Zehou’s A History of Classical Chinese Thought.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (5): 46-58. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-528.

Lamola, John. “Africa in Van Norden’s Philosophical Manifesto and King’s Multicultural Canon.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 1 (2019): 30-35.

Lamola, John. “Will We Ever Have a Genuine African Philosophy?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 1 (2019): 39-45.

Lamola, M. John. 2020. “Thomas Hobbes in the Time of Coronavirus.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (4): 72-75. https://wp.me/P1Bfg0-4Wa.

Landau-Halpern, Beth. “The Costs and Consequences of Teaching and Analyzing Alternative Medicine.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 42-45.

Lang, James C. “Situated Ignoramuses.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 5 (2012): 7-12.

Lang, James C. “Ignorare Aude! (Dare to be Ignorant! –Pace Kant).” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 5-10.

Lane, Jeremy F. “Bourdieu’s Theory of Linguistic Exchange: Realistic Description or Exclusionary Prescription?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 60-65.

Lane, Jeremy F. “Bourdieu, Science and Democracy: A Reply to Bridget Fowler and David Inglis.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 2 (2014): 12-16.

Larsen, Jesper Eckhardt. “Comment on Finn Collin and David Budtz Pedersen: ‘The Frankfurt School, Science and Technology Studies, and the Humanities.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 27-34.

Lassiter, Charles. 2020. “Response to Joshua Mugg’s ‘How Not to Deal with the Tragic Dilemma’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (3): 44-49. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Us.

Lassiter, Charles. 2024. “A Reply to Watson’s ‘Follow the Signs: Taking Direction from Semiotics on How to Identify Experts’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (4): 30–37. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8Iu.

Lauer, Helen. “Scientific Consensus and the Discursive Dilemma.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 9 (2018): 33-44.

Laurent, Brice. 2019. “Making Better Innovators, but for Which America?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (11): 32-34. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4F9.

Leach, Joan. “A Comic Moment for Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 62-64.

Lebens, Samuel. “True Successors and Counterfactual Approval.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 26-31.

Lebens, Samuel. “Counterfactual Approval and Idiosyncratic Counterfactual Approval.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 65-69.

Lee, Clarissa Ai Ling. “Why Do Critical Science Studies? A Prolegomena.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 51-55.

Lee, Clarissa Ai Ling. “Review of Making Medical Knowledge by Miriam Solomon.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 1 (2017): 1-8.

Lee, Ji-Young. 2021. “On Anticipatory Epistemic Injustice: Replies to Eric Bayruns García and Trystan S. Goetze.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (10): 39-42. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6dT.

Lennon, Kathleen. “Changing Imaginaries: A Reply to Churcher.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 19-23.

Lepock, Chris. “Norms and the Temptations of Relativism: A Reply to Sankey.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 37-42.

Levy, Neil. “The Bad News About Fake News.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 8 (2017): 20-36.

Levy, Neil. 2019. “Is Conspiracy Theorising Irrational?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (8): 65-76. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4wW.

Levy, Neil. 2020. “When Is it Right to be Wrong? A Response to Lewandowsky, Kozyreva and Ladyman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (2): 32-36. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Ou.

Levy, Neil. 2021. “Nudging is Giving Testimony: A Response to Grundmann.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (8): 43-47. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-65w.

Levy, Neil. 2021. “Is Myside Bias Irrational? A Biased Review of The Bias that Divides Us.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (10): 31-38. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6d6.

Levy, Neil. 2021. “Predictably Rational: A Further Response to Grundmann.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (12): 75-79. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6px.

Levy, Neil. 2022. “The Bias that Unites Us: A Reply to Keith Stanovich.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (1): 14-17. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6rd.

Lewandowsky, Stephan, Anastasia Kozyreva, and James Ladyman. 2020. “What Rationality? A Comment on Levy’s ‘Is Conspiracy Theorising Irrational?’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (2): 25-31. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Oc.

Liester, Mitchell B. 2022. “The Suppression of Dissent During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (4): 53-76. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Jw.

Linker, Maureen. “Considering Online News Comments: Are We Really So Irrational and Hate Filled?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 1-10.

Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. 2021. “Suspecting, Blaming, and Profiling: On Lloyd’s Epistemic Objection to (Racial) Profiling.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (10): 13-21. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6cx.

Little, Daniel. “Social Mechanisms and Scientific Realism: Discussion of ‘Mechanistic Explanation in Social Contexts’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1 , no. 3. (2012): 1-5.

Little, Daniel. “More challenges for social mechanisms: Contribution to the Persson-Chuang discussion.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 9 (2012): 28-32.

Little, Daniel. “Disaggregating Historical Explanation: The Move to Social Mechanisms in the Philosophy of History.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 1-7.

Littlejohn, Clayton. “A Note Concerning Conciliationism and Self-Defeat: A Reply to Matheson.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 104-112.

Lo, Arlene. 2023. “Myths, Marginalisation, and Hermeneutical Injustice: A Response to Bartlett’s ‘Children and Marginalisation’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (1): 70-77. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7yN.

Lobo, Gregory J. “Reason, Morality and Recognition: On Searle’s Theory of Human Rights.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 22-28.

Lobo, Gregory J. “Back to Basics: Straw Men, Status Functions, and Human Rights.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 11 (2017): 6-19.

Lockard, Claire A. 2024. “Critical Retrospective: An Open Letter to Commemorate the 10-Year Anniversary of Dotson’s ‘Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (4): 1–11. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8G9.

Lockie, Robert. “Response to Elqayam, Nottelmann, Peels and Vahid on My Paper ‘Perspectivism, Deontologism and Epistemic Poverty’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 21-47.

Loginov, Eugene. “Steve Fuller on Proofs for God’s Existence: An Interview.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 12 (2016): 1-3.

Losh, Elizabeth. “Hashtag Feminism and Twitter Activism in India.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 10-22.

Lougheed, Kirk. 2020. “Epistemic Elitism, Scepticism, and Diachronic Epistemic Reasons: A Rejoinder to Ranalli on Worldview Disagreement” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (11): 44-52. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5wy.

Lower, Erika. “Review of David Toomey, Weird Life: The Search for Life That Is Very,Very Different from Our Own.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 3 (2013): 6-7.

Lowery, Rebecca. “Our Filtered Lives: The Tension Between Citizenship and Instru-mentality.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 21-34.

Loy, Taylor. “Life at the Speed of Light: From the Double Helix to the Dawn of Digital Life, J. Craig Venter.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 31-34.

Ludwig, Ariel. 2023. “Theory and Reflexivity in Carceral Settings: A Response to Kiconco.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (12): 9–14. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8ly.

Łukaszewicz Alcaraz, Aleksandra. “A Reply to Jun’s ‘Posthuman Subjectivity and Singularity in the Nature-Culture Continuum’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (6): 60-65. “How Relativist Should We Be? A Reply to Stenmark.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 13-16.

Łukaszewicz, Aleksandra. 2022. “A Reply to Fulvio Mazzocchi’s ‘Diving Deeper into the Concept of “Cultural Heritage” and Its Relationship with Epistemic Diversity’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (6): 42-47. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6V7.

Lukianova, Ekaterina. 2022. “Facts, Deliberation and Efficiency: A Reply to Pauli.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (5): 68-70. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Qb.

Luyando, Alberto. “Event Review: Can We Imagine Our Way to a Better Future?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 39-41.

Lynch, William T. “Darwinian Social Epistemology: Science and Religion as Evolutionary Byproducts Subject to Cultural Evolution.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 26-68.

Lynch, William T. “Complexity, Natural Selection, and Cultural Evolution.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 64-72.

Lynch, William T. 2020. “Science and Socialism in the Time of Coronavirus.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (10): 16-25. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5up.

Lynch, William T. 2021. “Zombie Epistemology: Or, I Ain’t Gonna Work on Zoltan’s Farm, Either” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (6): 1-19. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Ur.

Lyne, John. “Having ‘A Whole Battery of Concepts’: Thinking Rhetorically About the Norms of Reason.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 143-148.

M

Ma, Lai. 2019. “Examining Innovation Culture: Review of Does America Need More Innovators?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (8): 65-67. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4mM.

Macfarlane, Allison. “Nuclear impacts: Uranium, waste, and nuclearity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 5 (2012): 1-2.

MacFarlane, James Michael. “Boundary Work: Post- and Transhumanism, Part I.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 52-56

Machin, Amanda. “Knowledge of Climates and Climates of Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 40-42.

Macknight, Vicki. 2020. “Google-Knowing From Within Google’s Political Economy: In Reply to Inna Kouper.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (7): 51-54. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5el.

Madison, Brent. “On the Nature of Intellectual Vice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 12 (2017): 1-6.

Madva, Alex. 2021. “(What) Are Stereotyping and Discrimination? (What) Do We Want Them to Be?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (11): 43-51. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6iI.

Malloggi, Francesca. “The Value of Privacy for Social Relationships.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 68-77.

Maher, Chauncey. “Normative Functionalism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 13-15.

Maher, Chauncey. “Normative Functionalism about Intentional Action.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 100-108.

Maher, Chauncey. “Reply to Reider.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 11 (2012): 16-23.

Majdik, Zoltan. ‘Reply to Derek Ross’ “Ambiguous Weighting and Nonsensical Sense” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 3 (2012): 24-28.

Majdik, Zoltan. “Expertise as Practice: A Response to DeVasto.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 11 (2016): 1-6.

Malapi-Nelson, Alcibiades. “Some Clarifying Points Regarding Shiffman’s Criticism of Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 1-5.

Malapi-Nelson, Alcibiades. “Transhumanism and the Catholic Church.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 5 (2018): 12-17.

Malapi-Nelson, Alcibiades. “On a Study of Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 7 (2018): 25-29.

Malapi-Nelson, Alcibiades. “Revisions on a Study of Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 5 (2019): 16-24.

Manzo, Gianluca. “Reputation and Social Mechanisms: A Comment on Origgi’s ‘A Social Epistemology of Reputation’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 5 (2013): 45-50.

Marcum, James A. “What’s the Support for Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis? A Response to Mizrahi and Patton.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 51-62.

Marcum, James A. “A Role for Taxonomic Incommensurability in Evolutionary Philosophy of Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 7 (2018): 9-14.

Margolis, Joseph. “A Response to a Question Regarding ‘Normative Functionalism.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 98-99.

Maring, Luke. “Abandoning the Academy is the Single Worst Thing Philosophers Could Do: A Reply to Frodeman and Briggle.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 54-58

Markova, Lyudmila. “Are Consensus and Pluralism Compatible? A Reply to Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 35-39.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “On the Individualistic Orientation of Social Epistemology: A Reply to Sanford Goldberg.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 9 (2013): 17-21.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “Context and Naturalism in Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 9 (2013): 33-35.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “The Beginning in Science and Humanity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 4-6.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “New people and a new type of communication.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 47-53.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “The Humanisation of the Surrounding World and the Technisation of Humans.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 49-52.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “Understanding, Not Only Cognition.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 52-55.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “A Brief Reply to Maya Frodeman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 53-54.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “Comments on Steve Fuller’s Presentation in Moscow.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 1-4.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “Comment on ‘Scientist as Fiction Writer: Soviet Science-Fiction and Space Exploration'”. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 56.

Markova, Lyudmila. “A New Look at Known Issues.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 1-5.

Markova, Lyudmila. “A Reply to Fuller’s Prolegomena.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 52-53.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “Material Carriers of Thought.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 11-20.

Markova, Lyudmila. “Transhumanism in the Context of Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 50-53.

Markova, Lyudmila. “Changes in Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 7 (2018): 15-18.

Markova, Lyudmila. “The Place of the Notion of the Weird in Today’s Thinking.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 5 (2019): 48-51.

Marsh, Ian. “‘Critical Suicidology’: Toward an Inclusive, Inventive and Collaborative (Post) Suicidology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 5-9.

Marshall, Colin. 2023. “Reply to Bollen’s ‘Towards a Clear and Fair Conceptualization of Empathy’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (9): 10–14. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-84J.

Marshall, Sandra. “A Problem for the Social Sciences: A Comment on James McCollum on Hermeneutical Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 7 (2012): 21-23.

Martin, Brian. “Constructing and Investigating Absences in Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 73-81.

Martin, Brian. “Public Health and Academic Freedom.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 44-49.

Martin, Brian. “An Experience with Vaccination Gatekeepers.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 10 (2016): 27-33.

Martin, Brian. “Technology and Evil.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 2 (2019): 1-14.

Martin, Brian. “Bad Social Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 3 (2019): 6-16.

Martin, Brian. 2019. “More on Refusing Evil.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (6): 1-3. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-49t.

Martin, Brian. 2019. “Uptake of a Conspiracy Theory Attribution.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (6): 16-30. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4cP.

Martin, Brian. 2019. “More on Bad Social Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (7): 13-17. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4fs.

Martin, Brian. 2019. “What’s the Fuss about Post-Truth?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 155-166. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Cw.

Martin, Brian. 2019. “Constructivism Versus Clear Thinking?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (11): 18-26. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4E0.

Martin, Brian. 2019. “Do We See Icons or Reality? A Review of Donald Hoffman’s The Case Against Reality.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (12): 13-24. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Ht.

Martin, Brian. 2019. “Science the Corporate Way: A Review of Sergio Sismondo’s Ghost-Managed Medicine.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (12): 55-59. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Jz.

Martin, Brian. 2021. “Covid Information Struggles.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (7): 16-26. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-60H.

Martin, Brian. 2021. “A Covid Paradigm?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (9): 44-50. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6a5.

Martin, Brian. 2022. “Knowledge as a Weapon?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (4): 90-96. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6L2.

Martin, Brian. 2022. “When to Read a Heavy Tome.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 84-89. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-76A.

Martin, Brian. 2022 “Beyond Ego-Dominance.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (10): 9-13. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7fU.

Martin, Brian. 2023. “Postmaterialism, Anyone?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (3): 17–26. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7F5.

Martin, Brian. 2024. “Censorship in Science: Deeper Processes.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (3): 1–5. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8D0.

Martini, Carlo. “The Problem of Disagreement and Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective. 3, no. 8, 22-24.

Martini, Carlo. “Review of Jonathan Matheson’s The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement.“ Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 29-32.

Masaka, Dennis. 2023. “A Critical Response to Renteria-Uriarte’s ‘Counteracting Epistemic Oppression through Social Myths’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (5): 48–57. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Oj.

Mason, Elinor. 2021. “What is Hermeneutical Injustice and Who Should We Blame?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (4): 17-22. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Mb.

Mason, Sharon E. 2020. “Closing the Hermeneutical Gap in STEM Education: A Reply to Lawrence Torcello.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (11): 53-58. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5wM.

Mateo Dieste, Josep Lluís. “Anthropocentrism and Divine Objectivity. Some Observations on the Logic Behind the ‘Scientific Miracle of the Qur’an’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 10 (2015): 8-9.

Matheson, Jonathan. “A Puzzle About Disagreement and Rationality.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 4 (2014): 1-3.

Matheson, Jonathan. “Epistemic Norms and Self-Defeat: A Reply to Littlejohn.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 26-32.

Matheson, Jonathan. 2020: “Debating the Significance of Disagreement: A Review of John Pittard’s Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (7): 36-44. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5dK.

Matheson, Jonathan and Katie V. Rivers. “Taking Issue: A Review of Bryan Frances’ Disagreement.“ Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 7-9.

Matheson, Jonathan and Valerie Joly Chock. “Knowledge and Entailment: A Review of Jessica Brown’s Fallibilism: Evidence and Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 10 (2018): 55-58.

Matheson, Jonathan and Valerie Joly Chock. “Science Communication and Epistemic Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 1 (2019): 1-9.

Matheson, Jonathan and Valerie Joly Chock. 2021. “The Possibility of Epistemic Nudging: Reply to Grundmann.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (8): 36-42. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-65f.

May, Simon Căbulea. “Bohman on domination and epistemic injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 8 (2012): 7-12.

Mazzocchi, Fulvio. 2022. “Valuing Epistemic Heritage without Embracing Relativism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (10): 1-8. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7fk.

Mazzolini, Elizabeth. “The Costs of Inhuman Epistemology: A Response to Myra Hird and Zsuzsa Gille.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 31-34.

McBrayer, Justin. 2023. “Reply to Jeroen de Ridder’s ‘Online Illusions of Understanding’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (5): 1-7. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Le.

McCauley, Jaime. “Using Institutional Ethnography to Examine the Social Organization of Absence.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 8 (2014): 22-27.

McCollum, James. “Fleshing out the structural aspects of hermeneutical injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 9 (2012): 33-36.

McCraw, Benjamin. “Thinking Through Social Epistemology: A Reply to Combes, Smolkin, and Simmons.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 1-12.

McCraw, Benjamin W. “Combes on McCraw on the Nature of Epistemic Trust: A Rejoinder.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 28-31.

McDonald, Lucy. 2024. “The Trouble with Bubbles: A Reply to Xin.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (1): 52–57. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8uj.

McGlynn, Aidan. 2021. “Extreme Testimonial Injustice or Discursive Injustice? A Reply to Townsend and Townsend on Indigenous Peoples in the Inter-American Human Rights System.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (4): 23-30. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5MA.

McKenna, Robin. “McBride on Knowledge and Justification.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 9 (2018): 53-59.

Medina, José. “Reply to Laura Beeby.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 6 (2012): 36-38.

Medvecky, Fabien. “Economics, Science and the Spandrels of San Marco.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 20-22.

Medvecky, Fabien. “Transgressions and the Scientific Knower.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 37-40.

Medvecky, Fabien. “Knowing From Others—A Review of Knowledge on Trust: A Critical Introduction to Testimony.“ Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 11-12.

Medvecky, Fabien. “Institutionalised Science Communication and Epistemic Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 2 (2019): 15-20.

Medvecky, Fabien. 2021. “What We Know about Producing Ignorance: A Review of Science and the Production of Ignorance: When the Quest for Knowledge Is Thwarted.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (10): 51-53. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6eE.

Méndez, María Pía. 2023. “The Severity of the Information Gap Problem for Epistocracy: On Gibbons’s Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (10): 47–52. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8bd.

Meyer, Marco. 2019. “Fake News, Conspiracy, and Intellectual Vice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 9-19. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4tp.

Meyer, Marco. 2020. “On Skipper’s Humility Heuristic” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (11): 38-43. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5we.

Mikalsen, Kjartan Koch. “An Ideal Case for Accountability Mechanisms, the Unity of Epistemic and Democratic Concerns, and Skepticism About Moral Expertise.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 1 (2018): 1-6.

Millar, Boyd. 2021. “Misinformation and the Limits of Individual Responsibility.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (12): 8-21. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6kD.

Miller, Boaz. “Reply to William Gorton.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 4 (2012): 1-2.

Miller, Boaz, Matthew J. Brown, Sanford Goldberg, and Kareem Khalifa. “On Analytic Social Epistemology and Fuller’s Critique: An Exchange.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2013).

Miller, Daniel P. “SIREN 2015 Keynote Address Review: The Nuclearity of Disaster.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 31-35.

Miller, Daniel P.“SIREN 2015 Lecture Review: ‘The Last Resort at Fukushima Daiichi’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 49-53.

Miller, Daniel P. “SIREN 2015 Lecture Review: ‘Leading and Communicating when Technology Fails’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 20-24.

Miller, Daniel P. “SIREN 2015 Lecture Review: The Unthinkable Organization.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 35-39.

Miller, Daniel P. “SIREN 2015 Lecture Review: Nuclear Leadership.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 1-6.

Miller, Glen. “Animal Laborans, Homo Faber, or Something Else?.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 3 (2018): 1-4.

Miller, Seumas. “Joint Epistemic Action and Collective Moral Responsibility: Reply to Andras Szigeti.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 40-50.

Miller, Seumas. 2021. “Regarding Joint Abilities and Joint Know-How: A Reply to Yuri Cath.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (2): 36-42. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Hh.

Miller, Seumas. 2021. “Reply to Giangiuseppe Pili’s ‘The Missing Dimension—Intelligence and Social Epistemology’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (10): 54-58. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6f2.

Miller, Seumas. 2022. “National Security Intelligence Ethics: Reply to Michael T. Collins.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (3): 77-84. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6EK.

Mills, Charles W. “White Ignorance and Hermeneutical Injustice: A Comment on Medina and Fricker.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 38-43.

Milne, Oliver. 2019. “Epistemic Institutions: The Case for Constitutionally-Protected Academic Independence.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (11): 27-31. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Ek.

Milojevic, Miljana. “The Problem of Translation and Knowledge Transfer.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 10 (2015): 47-50.

Mimouni, Jamal. “A Reply to Hamza’s ‘Faith and Reason: The Re-Emergence of Neo-Mu’tazilite Thought in the Discourse of Modern Muslim Scientists’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 5-9.

Min, John B. 2020. “If Democracy is a Habit, How Might Citizens Practice It?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (5): 91-93. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-54G.

Mittendorf, Will. 2023 “Should We be Generalists about Official Stories? A Response to Hayward.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (10): 36–43. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8a3.

Mizrahi, Moti. “A Reply to Patton’s ‘Incommensurability and the Bonfire of the Meta-Theories’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 10 (2015): 51-53.

Mizrahi, Moti. “A Reply to James Marcum’s ‘What’s the Support for Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis?’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 11 (2015): 21-24.

Mizrahi, Moti. “In Defense of Weak Scientism: A Reply to Brown.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 11 (2017): 9-22.

Mizrahi, Moti. “More in Defense of Weak Scientism: Another Reply to Brown.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 4 (2018): 7-25.

Mizrahi, Moti. “Weak Scientism Defended Once More.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 6 (2018): 41-50.

Mizrahi, Moti. “The (Lack of) Evidence for the Kuhnian Image of Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 7 (2018): 19-24.

Mizrahi, Moti. “Why Scientific Knowledge Is Still the Best.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 9 (2018): 18-32.

Mizrahi, Moti. 2019. “The Scientism Debate: A Battle for the Soul of Philosophy?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (9): 1-13. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4n3.

Mizrahi, Moti. 2021. “In Defense of Relative Realism: A Reply to Park.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (1): 1-6. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5AC.

Mizrahi, Moti. 2021. “Why Park’s Argument from Double Spaces is Not a Problem for Relative Realism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (6): 58-62. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Xx.

Mizrahi, Moti. 2021. “Philosophical Sentiments Toward Scientism: A Reply to Bryant.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (11): 19-24. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6h9.

Mizrahi, Moti. 2023. “Scientism and Sentiments about Progress in Science and Academic Philosophy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (6): 39–60. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7T9.

Moodey, Richard W. “Models of Face-to-Face Interaction and the Epistemic Significance of Other Minds.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 19-28.

Moodey, Richard W. “Relating Polanyi’s Tacit Dimension to Social Epistemology: A Response to Walter Gulick” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 1-6.

Moodey, Richard W. “Response to Gulick: Complementarity, Fault Lines, Terminology, Metaphors and Assertions.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 15-20.

Moodey, Richard W. “Performing Knowing: A Reply to Collins.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 42-43.

Moodey, Richard W. “The Fault-Line Remains: A Reply to Collins.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 13-17.

Moore, Alfred. “Transparency and the Dynamics of Trust and Distrust.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 4 (2018), 26-32.

Moore, Kelly. “Refusing Evil by (Sociotechnical) Design: A Comment on Martin.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 4 (2019): 14-18.

Moore, Kelly. “Refusing Evil by (Sociotechnical) Design: A Comment on Martin (Revised).” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 4 (2019): 19-23.

Morales, Alexander William. 2021. “An X Too Far: A Review of Randy Allen Harris’s Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science: Case Studies and Issues and Methods.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (5): 20-24. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Pu.

Morales, Alexander William. 2022. “Why Didn’t I Pick a Fight About X?: An Inquisitive Response to Harris.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (1): 1-6. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6qv.

Morgan, Marcus. “Between Cabbages and Kings: Speaking Across Forms of Life.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 24-29.

Morgan-Olsen, Brandon. 2022. “Relationships and Identity: A Reply to Hannon.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (7): 15-21. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6YT.

Moriarty, Devon. 2019. “Building on Aggregate Ethos: A Response to Hartelius.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (12): 50-54. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Jf.

Morrish, Liz. 2019. “The Accident of Accessibility: How the Data of the TEF Creates Neoliberal Subjects.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 77-80. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4xp.

Morton, Adam. “Could It Be a Conditional?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 10 (2018): 28-30.

Moss, Pamela. “Reading and Writing Across (Epistemological) Boundaries.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 46-54.

Mouzakitis, Angelos. 2020. “Political Imaginaries: A Preliminary Response.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (8): 33-40.

Mugg, Joshua. 2020. “A Rejoinder to Charles Lassiter’s ‘Response to Joshua Mugg’s ‘How Not to Deal with the Tragic Dilemma’ ’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (6): 93-99. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5aN.

Munn, Nicholas and Paul de Laat. “Social Epistemology and Social Media: An Exchange.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective.

Murguía, Adriana and Melissa Orozco. “Social Epistemology Past, Present and Future: An Interview with Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.2 (2014): 58-65.

N

Nanda, Meera. “Saffronized Science: Rampant Pseudoscience in ‘Vedic Garb’ in the Indian Subcontinent.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 39-47.

Napolitano, M. Giulia and Kevin Reuter. 2023. “Is Conspiracy Theory a Case of Conceptual Domination?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (11): 74–82.

Navarro, María G. “How to Interpret Collective Aggregated Judgements?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 27-28.

Navarro, María G. “Poor People of the World Unite! Poverty and the Future of Research in Heuristics.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 2 (2014): 19-21.

Navarro María G. “A Principled Standpoint: A Reply to Sandra Harding.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 17-23.

Neary, Mike. 2019. “Chain Reaction: Critical Theory Needs Critical Mass—Contradiction, Crisis and the Value-Form.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (9): 31-41. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4pd.

Nelson, Gregory. “Report on Michael Hardt Lecture.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2012).

Nelson, Gregory. “Putting The Deceptive Activist into Conversation: A Review and a Response to Rappert.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 11 (2017): 33-35.

Nguyen, C. Thi. 2019. “Group-Strapping, Bubble, or Echo Chamber?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (6): 31-37. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4dr.

Norrie, Stephen. “Three Social Contracts for an Academic Collective.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 1 (2011): 14-24.

Norrie, Stephen. “Can Critical Theory be Computerised and Collectivised?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 32-36.

Norrie, Stephen. “So, What Is a Research University? A Review of Chad Wellmon’s Organizing Enlightenment.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 31-38.

Nottelmann, Nikolaj. “Epistemic Poverty, Internalism, and Justified Belief: A Response to Robert Lockie.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 12-28.

Nottelmann, Nikolaj. “Epistemic Poverty, Subjectivism, and the Concept of Epistemic Justification. An Additional Reply to Lockie.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 7-15.

Nuzzo, Angelica. “The Social Dimension of Dialectical Truth: Hegel’s Idea of Objective Spirit.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 10-25.

Nyhan, Julianne. “‘Scholarly Labour and Digital Collaboration in Literary Studies’: An Invited Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 23-28.

Nylan, Michael. 2020. “Reimagining Li Zehou’s A History of Chinese Classical Thought.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (2): 40-54. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Pf.

O

O’Connor, Cailin. 2020. “Intellectual Vice and Social Networks?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (2): 37-39. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4P1.

Olson, Philip R. “Knowing ‘Necro-Waste’: A Reply to Hird.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 59-63.

Olson, Philip R. “Wanting to Believe and the Burden of Knowing.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 58-60.

Olson, Philip R. “Refining and Extending Necro-Waste.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 5-9.

Origgi, Gloria. “Reply to Paul Faulkner’s Comments.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 10 (2012): 1-3.

O’Rourke, Michael. “A Reply to Katri Huutoniemi’s ‘Interdisciplinarity as Academic Accountability.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 10 (2015): 26-32.

Orozco, Mel. “Visioneering Ourselves as Social Epistemologists.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014), 16-18.

Ottinger, Gwen. “Absence and Expectation.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 8 (2014): 10-12.

Otto, Melanie. 2019. “’An Experiment in the Technique of Awakening’—A Response to Duane Edwards.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (8): 43-47. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4le.

P

Pablé, Adrian. “Reality Re-Checked and Galileo Re-Integrated: A Reply to Jones and Spurrett.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.2 (2014): 49-57.

Padilla Cruz, Manuel. “On the Usefulness of the Notion of ‘Conceptual Competence Injustice’ to Linguistic Pragmatics.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 4 (2017): 12-19.

Padilla Cruz, Manuel. “Conceptual Competence Injustice and Relevance Theory, A Reply to Derek Anderson.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 12 (2017): 39-50.

Padilla Cruz, Manuel. “One Thing is Testimonial Injustice and Another Is Conceptual Competence Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 3 (2018): 9-19.

Padilla-Cruz, Manuel. “On the Pragmatic and Conversational Features of Venting: A Reply to Thorson and Baker.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 2 (2019): 21-30.

Padilla Cruz, Manuel. “On the Successfulness of Venting and Its Venues.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 2 (2019): 39-48.

Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2019. “Reconsidering Dismissive Incomprehension—Its Relation to Epistemic Injustices, Its Damaging Nature, and a Research Agenda: A Reply to Cull.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (11): 42-51. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4FJ.

Padilla Cruz, Manuel. “Dismissive Incomprehension Revis(it)ed: Testimonial Injustice, Competence, Face and Silence—A New Reply to Cull.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (3): 34-43. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4U0.

Page, Jennifer. 2021. “Repairing Epistemic Injustice: A Reply to Song.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (5): 28-38. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5QZ.

Page, Jennifer. 2021. “De-Moralizing Breastfeeding.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (10): 59-67. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6fs.

Palermos, Orestis and Duncan Pritchard. “Extended Knowledge and Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 105-120.

Palladino, Paolo. “Heidegger Today: On Jeff Kochan’s Science and Social Existence.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 8 (2018): 41-46.

Pallagi, Patrik and Steve Fuller. 2022. “Patrik Pallagi and Steve Fuller on the History and Future of Disability—The Drive to Overcome It and the Conception of Humanity Behind It.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (9): 56-61. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7c4.

Park, Seungbae. “Philosophers and Scientists are Social Epistemic Agents.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 6 (2018): 31-40.

Park, Seungbae, 2019. “Constructive Empiricism in a Social World: Reply to Richard Healey.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 146-154. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4BY.

Park, Seungbae. 2020. “Replies to Healey’s Comments Regarding van Fraassen’s Positions.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (1): 38-47. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4LX.

Park, Seungbae. 2020. “The Appearance and the Reality of a Scientific Theory.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (11): 59-69. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5×3.

Park, Seungbae. 2021. “On the Argument from Double Spaces: A Reply to Moti Mizrahi.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (2): 1-6. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5EI.

Parkhurst, Justin O and Sudeepa Abeysinghe. “What Constitutes ‘Good’ Evidence for Public Health and Social Policy Making? From Hierarchies to Appropriateness.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no 10 (2014): 40-52.

Parkhurst, Justin. “Posing Questions, Eschewing Hierarchies: A Response to Katikireddi.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 62-67.

Parray, Tauseef Ahmad. “Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan (1817-1898) on Taqlid, Ijtihad, and Science-Religion Compatibility.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 19-34.

Parviainen, Jaana. 2020. “ ‘We’re Flying the Plane While We’re Building It’: Epistemic Humility and Non-Knowledge in Political Decision-Making on COVID-19.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (7): 6-10. https://wp.me/P1Bfg0-4Wa.

Parviainen, Jaana and Anne Koski. 2021. “Towards an Institutional Account on Epistemic Humility and Arrogance.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (9): 22-28. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-68r.

Patton, Lydia. “Incommensurability and the Bonfire of the Meta-Theories: Response to Mizrahi.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 51-58.

Pauleen, David David Roone and Ali Intezari. “Big Data, Little Wisdom: Trouble Brewing? Ethical Implications for the Information Systems Discipline.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 9-33.

Pauli, Benjamin J. 2022. “Doing Things with Facts: A Response to Lukianova and Tolochin.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (2): 13-18. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6vJ.

Payton, Jonathan. “Ruben’s account of traditions and true successors: Two modifications and an extension.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 40-46.

Payton, Jonathan. “Keeping Successorhood and Inheritance Apart: A Reply to Lebens and Ruben.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 14-19.

Peake, Victoria. “The Value of Imagining the Trans/Posthuman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 13-15.

Pedersen, David Budtz. “Who Should Govern the Welfare State 2.0? A Comment on Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 51-59.

Pedersen, David Budtz. “A Social Epistemology for Scientific Excellence.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 64-65.

Peels, Rik. “Let’s Bite the Bullet on Deontological Epistemic Justification: A Response to Robert Lockie.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 42-49.

Peels, Rik. “Exploring the Boundaries of Ignorance: Its Nature and Accidental Features.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 1 (2019): 10-18.

Penrod, Joshua. “Has the Time Come for New Starting Points? Reply to David Hess’ ‘Neoliberalism and the history of STS Theory: Toward a Reflexive Sociology.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 1-6.

Penrod, Joshua. 2019. “Round Pegs, Square Holes: A Review of Being an Interdisciplinary Academic.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (9): 77-82. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4sw.

Perović, Slobodan. 2023. “The Counterfactual Paths and Their Convergence in the History of Physics, Science, and the World.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (10): 53–58. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8bP.

Persson, Johannes. “Social laws should be conceived as a special case of mechanisms: A reply to Daniel Little.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 7 (2012): 12-14.

Persson, Johannes. “Social mechanisms and explaining how: A reply to Kimberly Chuang.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 9 (2012): 37-41.

Peters, Uwe. 2024. “Science Based on Artificial Intelligence Need not Pose a Social Epistemological Problem.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (1): 58–66. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8vp.

Phillips, Amanda. “Playing the Game in a Post-Truth Era.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 54-5.

Phillips de Lucas, Amanda K. 2019. “Collaborative Review, Part I, on Being an Interdisciplinary Academic.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (9): 70-72. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4rD.

Piercey, Robert. “Faraway, So Close: Further Thoughts on Kanonbildung.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 5 (2018): 33-38.

Pietrucci, Pamela and Leah Ceccarelli. 2020. “What Did We Learn From L’Aquila? Scientist Citizens and Public Communication.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (7): 22-28. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5cZ.

Pigliucci, Massimo. “Was Feyerabend Right in Defending Astrology? A Commentary on Kidd.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 1-6.

Pigliucci, Massimo. “How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology? A Further Reply to Kidd.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 10-16.

Pigliucci, Massimo. “Feyerabend and the Cranks: A Response to Shaw.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2016): 1-6.

Pili, Giangiuseppe. 2021. “The Missing Dimension—Intelligence and Social Epistemology: A Reply to Miller’s ‘Rethinking the Just Intelligence Theory of National Security Intelligence Collection and Analysis’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (7): 1-9. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5ZM.

Piraino, Francesco. “Bruno Guiderdoni—Among Sufism, Traditionalism and Science: A Reply to Bigliardi.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 21-24.

Pitt, Joseph C. “Standards in Science and Technology Studies.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 1 (2011): 25-38.

Pittard, John. 2020. “The Epistemic Challenge of Religious Disagreement: Responding to Matheson.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (9): 55-64. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5nw.

Pittman, Jason M. “Trust and Transhumanism: An Analysis of the Boundaries of Zero-Knowledge Proof and Technologically Mediated Authentication.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 21-29.

Pittman, Jason M. 2022. “Review of Stefan Lorenz Sorgner’s We Have Always Been Cyborgs.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (9): 38-45. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7aE.

Podosky, Paul-Mikhail Catapang. 2023. “On the Non-Knowing of Animal Suffering: Against Gatekeeping Epistemic Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (10): 19–27. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-893.

Podosky, Paul-Mikhail Catapang. 2024. “A Defence of Other-Oriented Hermeneutical Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (1): 26–31. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8su.

Podosky, Paul-Mikhail Catapang and William Tuckwell. “There’s No Such Thing as Conceptual Competence Injustice: A Response to Anderson and Cruz.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 11 (2017): 23-32.

Pohlhaus, Gaile Jr. “On Subjects, Objects, and Others.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 44-50.

Pongiglione, Francesca and Carlo Martini. 2022. “Epistemic Harm, Social Consequences: A Reply to Torcello on Climate Change Disinformation.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (11): 42-48. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7md.

Popova, Evgeniya and Elena Simakova. “Common Vision in a Non-Community.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 52-54.

Posey, Kamili. “Scientism in the Philosophy of Implicit Bias Research.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 10 (2018): 1-16.

Posey, Kamili and María G. Navarro. “Review of Sandra Harding’s Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 60-64.

Potapov, Kyrill. 2021. “Objectification and the Labour of the Negative in the Origin of Human Thinking: A Response to Chris Drain.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (3): 23-29. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5J5.

Potapov, Kyrill. 2021. “Vygotsky’s Janus-Faced Theory of Language: A Reply to Drain’s ‘Tomasello, Vygotsky, and the Phylogenesis of Mind’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (8): 17-29. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-64q.

Pronskikh, Vitaly. 2023. “Do Scientists Need Mitigating Agents and Who is Responsible for Providing Them? Musings on Vučković and Sikimić’s ‘How to Fight Linguistic Injustice in Science’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (2): 45–52. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Cp.

Prusik, Charles A. 2022. “Reply to Iaan Reynolds: ‘The Dialectic of Progress and the Cultivation of Resistance in Critical Social Theory’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (5): 12-19. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6M9.

Pruzhinin, Boris I., Tatiana G. Shchedrina. “On the Specifics of Russian Philosophy: A Reply to Mikhail Sergeev.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 8 (2017): 37-41.

Purcell, Sebastian. 2019. “Native Dance as Epistemology: A Review of Shay Welch’s The Phenomenology of a Performative Knowledge System: Dancing with Native American Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (9): 42-46. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4pO.

Q

Quast, Christian. 2019. “Objective Expertise and Functionalist Constraints: A Comment on Croce.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (8): 15-28. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4jb.

Queiroz, Regina. 2019. “The Perils of Radical Subjectivity: A Comment on Antonio’s ‘Ethnoracial Populism’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (11): 15-17. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4DL.

Queiroz, Regina. 2020. “Quo Vadis European Union?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (4): 59-64. https://wp.me/P1Bfg0-4Wa.

R

Radder, Hans. “Everything of Value is Useful: How Philosophy Can be Socially Relevant.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 10 (2016): 20-26

Radenovic, Ljiljana. 2021. “From Deficient Liberalism Toward a Deeper Sense of Freedom.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (6): 20-25. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Vi.

Radenovic, Ljiljana. 2021. “A Post-Enlightenment Ethics of the Desert Fathers.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (8): 11-16. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-642.

Radenovic, Ljiljana. 2021. “Philosophy of My Faith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (9): 14-19. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-67N.

Radenovic, Ljiljana. 2021. “Empathy Revisited.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (12): 22-27. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6lF.

Radenovic, Ljiljana. 2022. “Weaving Faith into a Moral Life.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (6): 1-6. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6RF.

Radenovic, Ljiljana. 2022. “Misunderstanding the Human and the Divine.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (7): 9-14. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Ym.

Radenovic, Ljiljana. 2023. “Alternative Modernity and Its Discontents.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (1): 32-38. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7wd.

Radenovic, Ljiljana. 2023. “How Christianity Became Platonism for the Masses.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (7): 1-6. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Vc.

Radenovic, Ljiljana. 2024. “On Collective Responsibility: Thoughts Written During Air Raids.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (1): 67–75. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8uG.

Radi, Blas. 2021. “Epistemic Responsibility and Culpable Ignorance: About Editorial and Peer Review in Practical Philosophy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (1): 29-36. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5CL.

Räikkä, Juha. 2022. “On the Rationality of Word-Taking.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (12): 68-81. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7t2.

Räikkä, Juha. 2023. “Why a Pejorative Definition of ‘Conspiracy Theory’ Need Not Be Unfair.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (5): 63–71. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Pf.

Rancourt, Benjamin T. “The More Evidence Heuristic.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 27-41.

Rappert, Brian. “Brian Martin’s The Deceptive Activist: A Review.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 52-55.

Ratner, Helene. “Anthropology as multi-natural ontology? A response to Marianne de Laet’s ‘Anthropology as social epistemology’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 6 (2013): 5-11.

Rauvola, Rachel S. 2020. “Re-experiencing Through Research: Addressing Empathy-Based Stress and Trauma in the Academic Community.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (8): 53-59.

Rayas, Javier Zavala. “Reply to Liberman and López Olmedo’s ‘Psychological Meaning of “Coauthorship” among Scientists’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 70-72.

Reed, Isaac Ariail. “Science, Democracy and Sociology in the 21st Century: Response to Cruickshank’s ‘Anti-authority.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 40-45.

Reid, Andrew. 2020. “Are There ‘Fixed Facts’ in Convergence Accounts of Public Reason?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (2): 5-10. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Ne.

Reider, Patrick J. “Pittsburgh and the Analytic Tradition in Philosophy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 9 (2012): 20-27.

Reider, Patrick J. “Normative Functionalism in the Pittsburgh School.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 16-28.

Reider, Patrick J. “Sellars and Knowing the Thing-In-Itself.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 68-82.

Reider, Patrick J. “Sellars on Perception, Science, and Realism: A Critical Response.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 9 (2012): 39-56.

Reider, Patrick J. “Knowledge as a Public Commodity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 53-55.

Reiss, Julian and Sarah Wieten. “On Justin Biddle’s ‘Lessons from the Vioxx Debacle’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 20-22.

Remedios, Francis. “Orienting Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 54-59.

Remedios, Francis. “Knowing Humanity in the Social World.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 56-57.

Renteria-Uriarte, Xabier. 2023. “The Value of Shooting at a Plane with a Rifle: A Reply to Dennis Masaka.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (6): 61–75. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7U9.

Reynolds, Iaan. 2022. “Critique Without Normative Foundations: Response to Vogelmann and Prusik.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 8-17. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-72m.

Richmond, Sheldon. “Philosophy Out in the Cold.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 4 (2018): 33-40.

Richmond, Sheldon. 2020. “Relativism Relativized: A Review of Relativism and Post-Truth in Contemporary Society: Possibilities and Challenges.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (2): 20-24. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4NW.

Richmond, Sheldon. 2021. “Open Letter to Markus Gabriel: A Review of The Power of Art and The Meaning of Thought.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (8): 55-62. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-66f.

Richmond, Sheldon. 2022. “The Inner Life of Objects: A Critical Review of Architecture and Objects.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (11): 26-28. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7l4.

Rickless, Samuel. “Critical Appreciation of Jonathan Schaffer’s The Contrast-Sensitivity of Knowledge Ascriptions’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 1-6.

Rider, Sharon. 2023. “Philosophy is Not Politics: A Review of Susan Neiman´s Left is not Woke.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (10): 28–35. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-89z.

Rider, Sharon. 2024. “The Contemporary Research University: Freedom and Force.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (3): 6–12. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8Du.

Riggio, Adam. “Right Thinking for Right Science? On the Pitt-Collier Exchange Over the Purpose of STS.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 2 (2012): 35-39.

Riggio, Adam. “A process of truth: A reply to Steve Fuller’s essay on the silver anniversary of Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 9 (2012): 46-52.

Riggio, Adam. “We Have Never Been Human: How to Build a Movement In a World Without True Unity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 2 (2013): 30-34.

Riggio, Adam. “The Regeneration of the Book Review. A Reply to Stephen T. Casper.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 1-5.

Riggio, Adam. “Understanding the Worldly Character of Knowledge and Reason.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 58-59.

Riggio, Adam. “’I Feel Like I’ve Heard All This Before,’ A Reply to Stenmark and Lukes.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 70-73.

Riggio, Adam, Gregory Sandstrom and Monique Dufour. “Beyond Polemic, Part, I.” Review of The Science Delusion, by Curtis White. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 7-11.

Riggio, Adam. “‘I Feel Like I’ve Heard All This Before,’ A Reply to Stenmark and Lukes.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 73-76.

Riggio, Adam. “A Transhuman Remains All Too Human, or What’s the Point of Bio-Technological Enhancement If You’ll Still Be the Same Old Jerk? Part II.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 5-9.

Riggio, Adam. “Editing Memory: A Reply to Melanie White and Other Critics.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 13-18.

Riggio, Adam. “Legacy: A Review of James Kastely’s The Rhetoric of Plato’s Republic.“ Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 11 (2015): 34-39.

Riggio, Adam. “Freeing Knowledge: The Renegade Generation of Philosophical Writers in the New Age of Corporate Universities.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no 12 (2015): 39-41.

Riggio, Adam. “Can We Redeem Academia’s Worst Contempt?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 13-21.

Riggio, Adam. “Beyond the Academy: Solutions to the Academic Brain Drain in Embracing Public Creativity and Leadership.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 71-77.

Riggio, Adam. “The Pragmatic Radicalism of the Multitude’s Power: A Critical Eye on Fuller’s Return to Pareto.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 54-62.

Riggio, Adam. “The Violence of Pure Reason: Neoreaction: A Basilisk.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 34-41.

Riggio, Adam. “Subverting Reality: We Are Not ‘Post-Truth,’ But in a Battle for Public Trust.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 66-73.

Riggio, Adam. “Beyond Socrates: The Philosopher as Creative Craftsperson.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 13-21.

Riggio, Adam. “The Complexity of Rights, Claims, and Social Reality.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 12 (2017): 17-24.

Riggio, Adam. “Action in Harmony with a Global World.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 3 (2018): 20-26.

Riggio, Adam. “The True Shape of a Society of Friends.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 7 (2018): 40-45.

Riggio, Adam. “Humanity’s Halting Problem.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 9 (2018): 45-52.

Riggio, Adam. “Asking the Best Questions About Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 11 (2018): 31-35.

Riggio, Adam. “The Very Being of a Conceptual Scheme: Disciplinary and Conceptual Critiques.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 11 (2018): 53-59.

Riggio, Adam. “A New Era and a Continuing Mission.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 12 (2018): 43-47.

Riggio, Adam. “Immovable Presumptions as Philosophical Limit.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 1 (2019): 19-25.

Riggio, Adam. “Belief in a Weird World: A Review of Bernard Wills’ Believing Weird Things.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 3 (2019): 1-5.

Riggio, Adam. “In Defense of Our Common Goods.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 4 (2019): 1-5.

Riggio, Adam. 2020. “Philosophy Should Be Vibrant and Necessary: A Commentary on Li Zehou’s History.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (1): 27-37. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4LM.

Riggio, Adam. 2020. “Tracing the Ideologies of Vision.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (12): 22-27. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5yy.

Riggio, Adam. 2021 “But There Is No Here Any Longer Anywhere: Review of Phillips and Milner’s You Are Here.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (11): 35-42. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6ie.

Riggio, Adam. 2021. “Pathologies of a Shuddering Civilization: Review of Fuchs’s Communicating COVID-19.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (12): 58-65. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6o2.

Riggio, Adam. 2022. “The Dangers of Intellectual Honesty in a World of Lies: A Reply to Lee Basham.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (3): 61-69. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6DJ.

Riggio, Adam. 2022. “Becoming Gestalt: Human and Algorithmic Intelligence—Review of Machine Habitus.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (5): 1-11. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6LG.

Riggio, Adam. 2022. “The Weak-Willed Heart of Transhumanism’s Dreaming.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (6): 55-65. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Wb.

Riggio, Adam. 2022. “On the Worth of Trying.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (11): 29-37. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7lp.

Riggio, Adam. 2023. “Nothing to Lose but Our (Digital) Chains!” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (1): 1-8. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7uv.

Riggio, Adam. 2024. “The Dream of a Technology for the People.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (2): 12–21. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8xD.

Riggs, Wayne. “Response to David Coady.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 7 (2012): 17-20.

Rikowski, Glenn. 2023. “Some Thoughts on Science, Dialectics and Capital—After Luis Arboledas-Lérida.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (1): 13-21. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7uV.

Rini, Regina. 2022. “Confronting Fake News Through Non-Ideal Epistemology: A Reply to Croce and Piazza.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (2): 22-28. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6wD.

Rip, Arie. “On Epistemic Effects: A Reply to Castellani, Pontecorvo and Valente.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no.1 (2014): 47-51.

Rishani, Diana. “The Aesthetic Fate of the Body: Where Transhumanism Places the Body in the Art Medium & the Ethics Governing This Relationship.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 3, no. 5 (2014): 17-24.

Rishani, Diana. “On Feminist Epistemology: The Fallibility of Gendered Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, No. 6 (2014): 91-93.

Rishani, Diana. “Living Architecture in Dead Spaces: ‘Why Haven’t You Stopped Dying?’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 14-18.

Ritz, Bridget and Brandon Vaidyanathan. 2023. “The Beauty of Understanding: Scientific Understanding as Aesthetic Experience.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (3): 27–35. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Fl.

Robertson, David G. 2022. “We Need to Talk About Religion: A Response to Smith’s ‘A Quasi-Fideist Approach to QAnon’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (5): 50-57. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Pa.

Robins, Daniel. “Toxic Necro-Waste.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 39-42.

Robinson, Brian. 2023. “Paradoxical Teaching and the Art of Pedagogically Demonstrating Intellectual Humility.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (4): 10–15. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Jq.

Rockmore, Tom. “The Pittsburgh School, The Given and Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 29-38.

Rockmore, Tom. “Kasavin on Social Epistemology and Naturalism: A Critical Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 2 (2013): 8-11.

Rockmore, Tom. “Further reply to Kasavin: Context, Meaning and Truth.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 3 (2013): 22-24.

Rodbell, Al. “Social Epistemology as Oxymoron and Challenge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 37-39.

Rodriguez Medina, Leandro. “From Humanising to Politicizing Sociological Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 67-70.

Rolin, Kristina. “‘Facing the Incompleteness of Epistemic Trust’ – A Critical Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 74-78.

Rolin, Kristina. “Collective Epistemic Responsibility: A Reply to Chris Dragos.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 11 (2016): 7-11.

Rosenberg, Alex. 2020. “Scientism Versus the Theory of Mind.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (1): 48-57. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Mf.

Rosenberg, Alex. 2020. “How Van Woudenberg Got How History Gets it Wrong Wrong.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (8): 41-46. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5i5.

Rosenberger, Robert. 2021. “The Politics of the Passive Subject.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (9): 29-35. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-692.

Rosengren, Mats. 2020. “The Need for an Imaginative Politics.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (9): 20-29. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5lk.

Rošker, Jana S. “Enriching the Chinese Intellectual Legacy: A Review of Li Zehou’s “A History of Classical Chinese Thought.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (12): 1-7. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4G9.

Ross, Ben. “Between Poison and Remedy: Transhumanism as Pharmakon.“ Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 23-26.

Ross, Derek G. “Reply to Zoltan Majdik on ‘Ambiguous Weighting and Nonsensical Sense.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 5 (2012): 13-15.

Ruben, David-Hillel. “Reply to Williams.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 8-9.

Ruben, David-Hillel. “Reply to Williams’ Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 21-22.

Ruben, David-Hillel. “More on True Succession and Tradition: Replying to Lebens and Payton.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 29-31.

Ruben, David-Hillel. “Internal and External Perspectives: Reply to Beckstein.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 55-56.

Ruben, David-Hillel. “Addressing Ruben’s ‘Internal and External Perspectives: Reply to Beckstein.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 35-36.

Ruben, David-Hillel. “A Further Reply to Beckstein.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 94.

Ruser, Alexander. 2020. “Are You Looking for Trouble? A Reply to Mark Erickson’s ‘Afterword’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (6) 40-44. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-57g.

Ruser, Alexander. 2021. “How to be an Inconvenient Scientist? A Reply to Berry Tholen.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (2): 7-13. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Fs.

Rust, Joshua and Steven Smallpage. 2020. “Clarity, Value Conflict, and Academic Politics: Weber’s ‘Science as a Vocation’ a Hundred Years Later.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (6): 66-76. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-590.

S

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Is Blockchain an ‘Evolutionary’ or ‘Revolutionary’ Technology, and So What If It Is?: Digitally Extending Satoshi Nakamoto’s Distributed Ledger Innovation.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 3 (2019): 17-49.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Science, Ideology and Knowledge: A Reply to “Social Epistemology Revisted.”” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 3 (2012): 29-34.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “In Steve Fuller’s Words: Intelligent Design.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 6 (2012): 3-20.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “The Courage of Extending Humanity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2012).

Sandstrom, Gregory, Thomas Basbøll, Emma Craddock and Eric O. Scott. “Intelligent design as social epistemology: Collective judgment forum.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 7 (2012): 1-11.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “How many ‘sciences’ are there?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 10 (2012): 4-15.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Laws of media – The four effects: A McLuhan contribution to social epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 12 (2012): 1-6.

Sandstrom, Gregory, Adam Riggio and Monique Dufour. “Beyond Polemic, Part, II.” Review of The Science Delusion, by Curtis White. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 14-21.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Memetics vs. Human Extension: Round One – A Meme by Any Other Name.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 28-37.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Extending Knowledge and the Extended Mind: Interview Report Précis.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.2 (2014): 34-37.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Human Satellites and Creative Extension.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 60-63.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Reinventing Humanity with a New Sociological Imagination.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 56-61.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Steve Fuller’s False Hope in IDism: The Discovery Institute’s Anti-Transhumanism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 10 (2015): 1-7.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Fuller than Complete: Darwin’s Age Comes to an End.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 11 (2016): 12-17.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Trans-Evolutionary Change Even Darwin Would Accept.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 11 (2016): 18-26.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Who Would Live in a Blockchain Society? The Rise of Cryptographically-Enabled Ledger Communities.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 27-40.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Is Blockchain an ‘Evolutionary’ or ‘Revolutionary’ Technology, and So What If It Is?: Digitally Extending Satoshi Nakamoto’s Distributed Ledger Innovation.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 3 (2019): 17-49.

Sandstrom, Gregory. 2020. “Design, Evolution and Extension: Facing the Challenge of COVID-19 Together.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (4): 26-38.

Santos-Lang, Chris. 2022. “The Method of Convergent Realism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (1): 33-49. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6t5.

Santos-Lang, Chris. 2023. “The Method of Convergent Realism, Part III: A Reply to Haklay.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (1): 9-12. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7v0.

Sartwell, Crispin. “Anti-Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 62-75.

Sassower, Raphael. “Upstream, Anyone? A Critical Reply to J. J. Fellows’ ‘Downstream of the Experts’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 139-142.

Sassower, Raphael. “A Bridge over Turbulent Waters: A Reply to Justin Cruickshank on Comparing Popper and Rorty.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 57-59.

Sassower, Raphael. “Problem-Solving Critical Contingencies: Popper and Rorty According to Cruickshank.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 30-32.

Sassower, Raphael. “Beyond Lamentations: Comments on Justin Cruickshank’s Public Intellectuals, Education and the Need for Dissatisfaction.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 50-54.

Sassower, Raphael. “Appealing to Academics to Become Public Intellectuals: A Reply to Justin Cruickshank and Ioana Cerasella Chis.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 42-45.

Sassower, Raphael. “Popper as a Socratic Public Intellectual.”Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 35-37.

Sassower, Raphael. “Radical Public Intellectuals.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 57-63.

Sassower, Raphael. “Beyond Hubris: Desiderata of the Future of Political Economy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 38-50.

Sassower, Raphael. “Norms and Faith: Comments on the Business of People.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 1-10.

Sassower, Raphael. “The Opening of the American Mind.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 5 (2018): 1-4.

Sassower, Raphael. “Heidegger and the Sociologists: A Forced Marriage?.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 5 (2018): 30-32.

Sassower, Raphael. “Post-Truths and Inconvenient Facts.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 8 (2018): 47-60.

Sassower, Raphael. “Imagining a Different Political Economy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 9 (2018): 7-11.

Sassower, Raphael. “Human Nature in the Post-Truth Age.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 1 (2019): 36-38.

Sassower, Raphael. “On Political Culpability: The Unconscious?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 1 (2019): 26-29.

Sassower, Raphael. 2019. “The Neoliberal University and the Common Good.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 90-106. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4yf.

Sassower, Raphael and Seif Jensen. “The Problem of Demarcation Isn’t Going Away: On the Legitimation of the Social Sciences in Light of Popper, Cruickshank, and Reed.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 69-84.

Sassower, Raphael. 2020. “There is Always Time for Critique.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (7) 11-17. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5cq.

Sassower, Raphael. 2021. “Some are Still Locked Out after being Locked Down: Review of Bruno Latour, After Lockdown.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (12): 44-47. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6mW.

Sassower, Raphael. 2021. “It’s the Economy, Stupid: Comment on Fuller’s ‘Is the Metaverse the New Metaphysics’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (12): 73-74. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6p7.

Sassower, Raphael 2022. “Why Does Latour the Postmodern Critic Still Matter?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (12): 1-9. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7ol.

Sassower, Raphael. 2022. “A Hazard Called Sociology: Review of Stephen Turner’s Mad Hazard: A Life in Social Theory.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (12): 20-26. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7p9.

Sassower, Raphael. 2024. “Whose Knowledge is it, Anyway? A Response to Şimşek’s ‘Propositional Versus Encyclopedic Epistemology and Unintentional Plagiarism’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (3): 13–19. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8E5.

Sati, Joel. “From Standoff to Foundations: On Black Lives Matter and All Lives Matter.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 9 (2018): 1-6.

Sawyer, Sarah. “Contrastivism and Anti-Individualism: A Response to Aikin and Dabay.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 1-6.

Sawyer, Sarah. “Contrastivism and Anti-Individualism Part II: A Further Response to Aikin and Dabay.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 10-12.

Scalambrino, Frank. “Tales of the mighty tautologists?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 83-97.

Scalambrino, Frank. “From a Statement of Its Vision Toward Thinking into the Desire of a Corporate Daimon.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 34-39.

Scalambrino, Frank, Adam Riggio, Emma Craddock and Susan Dieleman. “The Future of the Enlightenment?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 33-36.

Scalambrino, Frank. “Employees as Sims? The Conflict Between Dignity and Efficiency.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 35-47.

Scalambrino, Frank. “How Technology Influences Relations to Self and Others: Changing Conceptions of Humans and Humanity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 30-37.

Scalambrino, Frank. “Reviewing Nolen Gertz’s Nihilism and Technology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 12 (2018): 22-28.

Scheman, Naomi. “Reply to Louise Antony.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 9 (2013): 1-11.

Schurz, Gerhard. 2023. “Enhancement of Voters’ Competence Based on Meta-Inductive Learning: A Reply to Spelda, Stritecky, and Symons.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (12): 25–30. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8oE.

Schweber, Libby. “Critical Reply to David Hess’ ‘Neoliberalism and the History of STS Theory.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 7-11.

Schwengerer, Lukas. 2021. “Revisiting Online Intellectual Virtues.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (3): 38-45. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5JX.

Schyfter, Pablo. “Function, Functional Status, and the Primacy of the Collective: A Reply to Garson.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 38-43.

Schyfter, Pablo. “Inaccurate Ambitions and Missing Methodologies: Thoughts on Jeff Kochan and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 8 (2018): 8-14.

Schyfter, Pablo. 2021. “Knowing for Something’s Sake.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (4): 37-44. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5Nm.

Sclove, Richard. 2022. “More on Ego-Dominance in Modern Civilization: Author Comment on Brian Martin’s Review of Escaping Maya’s Palace.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (10): 35-39. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7hH.

Scotland-Stewart, Laurel. 2021. “Being Through the Body: A Reply to Mark Gilks’s ‘Narrating Being through Phenomena’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (11): 60-66. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6jC.

Sekhsaria, Pankaj. 2020. “The Relevance of Lab Studies and STS in a Changed Universe? A Response to Kant’s Review of Instrumental Lives.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (4): 3-6. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4VK.

Sergeev, Mikhail. “‘Integral Knowledge’ and Enlightenment Rationalism: A Reply to Pruzhinin and Shchedrina.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 4 (2017): 1-3.

Seidel, Markus. “Ludwik Fleck’s Scientism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 79-88.

Seidel, Markus. 2019. “Balancing the Normativity of Expertise.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (7): 34-40. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4h4.

Selinger, Evan. “The Politics of Expertise, Patronage, and Public Engagement.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 8 (2014): 13-18.

SERRC. “Crediting People: An Exchange.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2014).

SERRC. “Bourdieu and Language.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2013).

SERRC. “Horizons for Social Sciences and Humanities – Post-Conference Interview.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2013).

SERRC. “Social Epistemology’s 25th Anniversary – The original statement of purpose from 1987 by Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2012).

Shahryari, Shahram. 2022. “The Strong Program and Asymmetrical Explanation of the History of Science: A Reply to Collin.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (6): 31-37. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6U8.

Shaw, Jamie. “Feyerabend and the Cranks: On Demarcation, Epistemic Virtues, and Astrology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 74-88.

Shearmur, Jeremy. “Popper, Social Epistemology and Dialogue.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 1-12.

Sherman, Ben. “(Less Un-) Attainable Virtues: A Response to Alfano.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 10 (2015): 14-18

Sherman, Ben. “Learning How to Think Better: A Response to Davidson and Kelly.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 48-53.

Shields, Matthew. 2024 “Hazards of Conceptual Engineering: Revisiting the Case of ‘Conspiracy Theory’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (2): 74–90. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8BG.

Shiffman, Mark. “Real Alternatives on Decisive Issues: A Response to Alcibiades Malapi-Nelson.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 52-55.

Shipovalova, Lada V. and Yulia V. Shaposhnikova. 2020. “Public Science Communication: Notes on the Reality and the Ideal.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (6): 45-49. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-57w.

Shipovalova, Lada V. and Yulia V. Shaposhnikova. 2023. “Being at the Crossroads: On the Mission of the Social Philosopher of Science | Review of Kasavin’s A Social Philosophy of Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (3): 36–40. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7G3.

Shussett, Daniel. 2023. “A Review of Gulson, Sellar, and Webb’s Algorithms of Education.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (5): 8–13. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7LI.

Simbürger, Elisabeth. “Social Epistemology As Work: A Quest for Normativity at the University.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 4 (2014): 4-6.

Simmons, J. Aaron. “Existence and Epistemic Trust.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 14-19.

Simões dos Reis, Verusca, Riggio, Adam and Simbürger, Elisabeth. “Does the Public University Still Exist?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 3 (2012): 14-17.

Simons, Massimiliano. 2021. “How to Do Things with Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (3): 15-22. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5IO.

Singer, Brian C.J. 2020 “On ‘Conceptualizing the Political Imaginary’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (6): 1-14. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-554.

Smart, Paul R. “(Fake?) News Alert: Intellectual Virtues Required for Online Knowledge!.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 2 (2018): 45-55.

Smart, Paul R. and Robert W. Clowes. 2021. “Intellectual Virtues and Internet-Extended Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (1): 7-21. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5AY.

Smith, Leonie. “Challenges and Suggestions for a Social Account of Testimonial Sensitivity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 18-26.

Smith, Nicholas. 2022. “Some Clarifications and a Modest View on Social Epistemology and Religion: A Reply to Robertson.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (7): 49-55. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-70N.

Smith, Nicholas D. 2020. “Collective Belief Questioned.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (7): 58-63. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5f0.

Smolkin, Doran. “Clarifying the Dependence Condition: A Reply to Benjamin McCraw’s, ‘The Nature of Epistemic Trust’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no 10 (2015): 10-13.

Smyth, John. 2020. “The Making of Bullshit Leadership and Toxic Management in the Neoliberal University.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (5): 9-18. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-50m.

Sokal, Alan. “A Dialogue on a Paradigm Case of Bad Science: Comment on Brian Martin.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 5 (2019): 36-47.

Sokolova, Tatiana. “Scientist as Fiction Writer: Soviet Science-Fiction and Space Exploration.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 3-13.

Song, Seunghyun. 2021. “Epistemic Repair: A Reply to Page.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (11): 25-34. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6hI.

Specian, Petr. 2022. “Shall Justice Prevail? Reforming the Epistemic Basic Structure in a Non-Ideal World.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 75-83. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-768.

Spewak, David C. Jr. 2023. “What Exactly is Wrong with Telling Someone You Believe Them When You Don’t? A Reply to Luxemburg-Peck.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (12): 1–8. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8kb.

Spiegel, Thomas J. 2022. “The Epistemic Injustice of Epistemic Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (9): 75-90. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7dv.

Spurrett, David. “Disintegrating Galileo: A Commentary on Pablé.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 23-27.

Stamm, Emma. “Retooling ‘The Human.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 1 (2018): 36-40.

Stamm, Emma. 2021 “Salience Machines: A Review of Florian Jaton’s The Constitution of Algorithms: Ground-Truthing, Programming, Formulating.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (9) 1-6. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-674.

Stamm, Emma. 2022. “Curiosity and Anti-Economy: A Response to Florian Jaton.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (4): 51-52. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6IZ.

Standring, Adam and Simone Tulumello. 2019. “Geographies of the Knowledge Economy on the Semi-Periphery: The Contradictions of Neoliberalisation and Precarity in Portugal.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 81-89. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4xP.

Stanovich, Keith E. 2021. “A Rational Disagreement about Myside Bias.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (12): 48-57. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6nr.

Stanovich, Keith E. 2022. “More Rational Disagreement, But Some Convergence Too.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (3): 32-35. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6BE.

Steinhart, Eric. 2024. “On Idolatry: A Reply to Wills.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (1): 36–42. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8tB.

Stenmark, Mikael. “Relativism and Uncertainty – A Response to Lukes and Riggio.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 10-15

Stöckelová, Tereza. “Unspoken Complicity: Further Comments on Castellani, Pontecorvo and Valente and Rip.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 17-20.

Stokes, Patrick. “Between Generalism and Particularism about Conspiracy Theory: A Response to Basham and Dentith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 10 (2016): 34-39.

Stokes, Patrick. “Reluctance and Suspicion: Reply to Basham and Dentith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 48-58.

Strand, Michael. 2023. “Why Don’t Big Theory Books Work in the US? A Reply to Simon Susen.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (10): 1–18. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-87J.

Strand, Michael. 2024 “The End of Theory? A Reply to Susen.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (2): 56–65. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8AK.

Sudall, Edward. 2002. “Constructive Critique: Social Value in Science Fact.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 57-74. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-752.

Sullivan, Emily. 2019 “Beyond Testimony: When Online Information Sharing is not Testifying.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 20-24. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4tv.

Suomela, Todd. “Some (Initial) Connections between Citizen Science and Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 2 (2014): 17-18.

Susen, Simon. 2023. “The End of Big Theory? A Rejoinder to Strand.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (11): 54–73. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8hI.

Swindal, James. “Norms and Causes: Loosing the Bonds of Deontic Constraint.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 117-132.

Sysoev, Tikhon. 2020. “Interview with Steve Fuller on State 2.0.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (12): 1-9. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5xE.

Szigeti, András. “Seumas Miller: Joint Epistemic Action and Collective Moral Responsibility—A Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 14-19.

Szymanski, Erika. “Review—Experts: The Knowledge and Power of Expertise.“ Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 33-36.

Szymanski, Erika. “A Brief Note on Defining Expertise: A Reply to Grundmann.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 43-45.

T

Technoprogressive Declaration. Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, Transvision 2014 Conference, Paris.

Talbert, Bonnie. “Paralysis by Analysis Revisited.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 1 (2018): 6-9.

Tatchell, Jessica. “Making Human Rights Fit for the 21st Century: The Challenge of Morphological Freedom.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 34-39.

Tateo, Luca. “Ethics, Cogenetic Logic, and the Foundation of Meaning.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 12 (2018): 1-8.

Taylor, Peter J. “Questioning the Darwinism that Lynch Presents as a Viable Basis for Humans to Pursue Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 85-87.

Taylor, Peter. “Not Throwing Up My ‘hand in defeat … or reduc[ing] everything to contextual complexity’: A Short Response to Lynch’s Counter-Criticisms.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 65-66.

Tebben, Nicholas and John Waterman. “The Market for Testimony: A Reply to Our Critics.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 43-51.

Thalos, Mariam. 2023 “Public Sentiment and Its Powers.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (6): 1-20. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7QD.

Toler, Robyn. “The Progress and Technology of City Life.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 78-85.

Toomey, David. “Thoughts on Weird Life, Scientific Speculation, and the Spaces between the Disciplines.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 3 (2013): 15-18.

Torcello, Lawrence. 2020. “Science Denial, Pseudoskepticism, and Philosophical Deficits Undermining Public Understanding of Science: A Response to Sharon E. Mason.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (9): 1-9. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5ke.

Torcello, Lawrence 2022. “Climate Change Disinformation and Culpability: A Sympathetic Reply to Pongiglione and Martini.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (9): 29-37. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7ac.

Torcello, Lawrence. 2023. “Ethical Silence, Moral Framing, and Role of the Humanities against Disinformation: A Final Reply to Pongiglione and Martini.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (5): 30–38. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7MO.

Tossut, Silvia. “Which Groups Have Scientific Knowledge? A Reply to Chris Dragos.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 18-21.

Townsend, Leo and Dina Lupin Townsend. 2021. “Are ‘Epistemic’ and ‘Communicative’ Models of Silencing in Conflict?” Reply to McGlynn.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (7): 27-32. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-615.

Trasmundi, Sarah Bro. 2024. “Becoming a Reader: Dwelling Within the Page.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (3): 20–32. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8Ep.

Troyer, John. “‘Owning’ Necro-Waste.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 59-63.

Trufanova, Elena. “A Reply to ‘The Destiny of Atomism in the Modern Science and the Structural Realism’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2016): 62-65.

Tsou, Tsung-Yen. 2023. “The Next Step After Three Decades: A Reply to Basu.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (3): 5–14. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7DU.

Tuboly, Adam Tamas. 2023. “What’s in the Darkness? Understanding Fringe and Pseudoscience.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (9): 6–9. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-84u.

Tucker, Aviezer. “Clarifying Testimonial Independence.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 93-96.

Tuckwell, William. 2019. “Richly Trustworthy Allies.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 33-29. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4tF.

Turner, Stephen. “Thinking Epistemically about Experts and Publics: A Response to Selinger.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 36-43.

Turner, Stephen. “Fuller’s roter Faden.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 5 (2018): 25-29.

Turner, Stephen. “Circles or Regresses? The Problem of Genuine Expertise.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 4 (2019): 24-27.

Turner, Stephen. 2021. “Our Techno-Masters and their Philosophical Cheerleaders: A Review of Richmond’s A Way Through the Global Techno-Scientific Culture.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (12): 66-68. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6om.

Turner, Stephen. 2022. “Appreciating and Elaborating on Raphael Sassower’s Review of Mad Hazard.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (12): 52-60. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7rK.

Tweney, Ryan D. “Commentary on Anderson and Feist’s ‘Transformative Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 23-26.

Tyndal, Jason. 2019. “Public Reason Liberalism and the Certification of Scientific Claims.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (11): 8-14. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Du.

Tyson, Charlie and Naomi Oreskes. 2020. “The American University, the Politics of Professors and the Narrative of ‘Liberal Bias’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (8): 14-32. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5gq.

U

Uduagwu, Chukwueloka S. “How Do We Construct Ontology Within a Particular Culture? A Conversation with L. Uchenna Ogbonnaya.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 4 (2019): 34-37.

Unger, Stephen H. “Review of Engineers for Change: Competing Visions of Technology in 1960s America, Matthew Wisnioski.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 6 (2013): 1-4.

V

Vaditya, Venkatesh. 2020. “Social Imaginary and Epistemic Discrimination: From Global Justice to Epistemic Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (10): 1-7. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5nU.

Vaditya, Venkatesh. 2021. “Coloniality, Global Power Asymmetry and Epistemic Liberation.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (11): 10-18. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6gI.

Vähämaa, Miika. “Secrets, Errors and Mathematics: Reconsidering the Role of Groups in Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 9 (2013): 36-51.

Vähämaa, Miika. “Empirical Social Epistemology – The Call for a Socio-Psychological Approach.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6, 69-76.

Vahid, Hamid. “Deontological Perspectivism: A Reply to Lockie.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 12-17.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen and Michiel Van Oudheusen. “Beyond Consensus? A Reply to Alan Irwin.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 48-53.

Vanderslott. Samantha. 2019. “A Response to ‘Uptake of a Conspiracy Theory Attribution: Part 1 and 2’ by Brian Martin.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (9): 47-50. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4q8.

Van Drooge, Leonie. “Reviewers and Their Roles as Users/Producers.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 8 (2014): 19-21.

van Woudenberg, René. 2020. “Self-Defeat, Inconsistency, and the Debunking of Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (6): 83-92. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5an.

Vavova, Katia. 2023. “Open-Mindedness, Rational Confidence, and Belief Change.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (2): 33–44. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7BH.

Vecchione, Elisa. “Comments on the Technoprogressive Declaration.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 46-47.

Vélez-Cuartas, Gabriel. “Invisible Colleges 2.0: Eponymy as a Scientometric Tool.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 3 (2018): 5-8.

Vermeulen, Niki. “Plant Elicitors as Bio-Objects.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 1-4.

Vernon, Richard. “Evanescent and Embedded Agents.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 4-10.

Vijaisri, Priyadarshini. “The Turn of Postscript Narratives.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 10. (2018): 22-27.

Vogelmann, Frieder. 2022. “Grounding Critical Theory.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (5): 27-32. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6N2.

Vrahimis, Andreas. 2023. “Algorithmic Opinion Mining and the History of Philosophy: A Response to Mizrahi’s For and Against Scientism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (5): 39–47. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7NE.

Vučković, Aleksandra and Vlasta Sikimić. 2023. “Mitigation and Linguistic Epistemic Tolerance as Requirements for Linguistically Inclusive Science: A Dialogue with Vitaly Pronskikh.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (5): 23–29. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Ms.

W

Wagemans, Jean H.M. 2019. “Why We Should Come Off the Fence When Experts Disagree,” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (7): 9-12. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4eL.

Wagenknecht, Susann. “Four Asymmetries Between Moral and Epistemic Trustworthiness.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 82-86.

Wagner-Egger, Pascal; Gérald Bronner, Sylvain Delouvée, Sebastian Dieguez, Nicolas Gauvrit. “Why ‘Healthy Conspiracy Theories’ Are (Oxy)morons: Statistical, Epistemological, and Psychological Reasons in Favor of the (Ir)Rational View.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 3 (2019): 50-67.

Waldman, Ari Ezra. 2021. “Habit and Performative Privacy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (10): 43-50. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6el.

Wallace, Rodrick. 2020. “A Comment on Collective Belief.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (7): 55-57. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5eI.

Walker, Jesse. 2023. “When Is a Conspiracy Theory a Conspiracy?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (7): 20–22. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Xa.

Walker, Jesse. 2023. “Defining ‘Conspiracy Theory’: A Reply to Lee Basham.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (8): 10–11. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7ZO.

Walker, Jesse. 2023. “Creative Misreadings.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (8): 61–65. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-82M.

Wang, Cong. 2020.“‘New Infrastructure Investment’ (新基建) in China: A Proactionary Measure After the COVID-19 Crisis.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (6): 77-82. https://wp.me/P1Bfg0-4Wa.

Washington, Natalia. “I Don’t Want to Change Your Mind: A Reply to Sherman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 10-14.

Watson, Jamie Carlin. 2020.”Hunting the Expert: The Precarious Epistemic Position of a Novice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (4): 51-58. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4YG.

Watson, Jamie Carlin. 2020. “Coalitions of Trust: Using Epistemic Teams to Identify Experts.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (8): 60-70.

Watson, Jamie Carlin. 2024. “Follow the Signs: Taking Direction from Semiotics on How to Identify Experts.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (2): 37–46. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8zE.

Watson, Lani. 2021. “Response to Franca d’Agostini’s ‘Alethic Rights: Preliminaries of an Inquiry into the Power of Truth’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (7): 33-39. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-61H.

Watson, Lani. 2021. “Interview on The Right To Know: Epistemic Rights and Why We Need Them.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective interviewed by Daniella Meehan. Recorded 15 December. Three MP4 audio files. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6tI.

Weiss, Sabrina. “Review of Humanity 2.0 by Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 3 (2012):6-9.

Werkheiser, Ian. “Developing Community Epistemic Capacities.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 97-101

West, Mark D. “Doxastic Involuntarism, Attentional Voluntarism, and Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 37-51.

West, Mark D. “Considering Purposeful Epistemology: On Starting Over. Review of Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 19-33.

West, Mark D. “Organic Solidarity, Science and Group Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 10 (2016): 1-11.

West, Mark D. “The Holidays and What is Given.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 12 (2016): 17-19.

West, Mark D. 2021. “Gaia and COVID: A Review of Bruno Latour’s After Lockdown.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (12): 36-43. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6mD.

West, Mark D. 2022. “Embodying ‘Necro-Waste’: On Toxic Discourse.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (3): 1-12. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6zS.

West, Mark D. 2022. “Review of Modelwork: The Material Culture of Making and Knowing.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (5): 20-26. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6My.

West, Mark D. 2023. “Review: John Troyer’s Technologies of the Human Corpse.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (2): 27-32. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-7Bh.

West, Mark D. 2023. “Conspiracy Theory and the ‘Bodyguard of Lies’: The Bennewitz Matter.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (8): 21–32. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-80K.

West, Mark D. 2023. “Necro-Waste and Hauntology: Ghosts, Specters, and the Infinitive Responsibility of the Past.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (10): 65–75. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8dX.

West, Mark D. 2024. “Review: Epistemic Injustice and the Philosophy of Recognition.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (1): 1–10. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8qS.

West, Mark D. and Jay Rubin. “Epistemological Questions, Boundary Objects and Hopi Myth.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 1-13.

West, Mark D. and Miika Vähämaa. “La Nouvelle Querelle des Anciens et des Modernes: The Analytic and Critical Tendencies in Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 2 (2018): 36-41.

Westphal, Kenneth R. “Higher Education & Academic Administration: Current Crises Long Since Foretold.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 1 (2018): 41-47.

Westphal, Kenneth R. 2022. “‘A Republic, If You Can Keep It’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (7): 22-32. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Zq.

Westrum, Ron. “Review of Henry Bauer, Dogmatism in Science and Medicine: How Dominant Theories Monopolize Research and Stifle the Search for Truth.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 11 (2012): 10-11.

Wettersten, John. “The Social Scientific Study of Rationality: A Response to Joseph Agassi.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 2 (2012): 5-10.

Whitaker, Emilie. “Beyond Black and Green: The New Dystopian Plains.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 67-72.

Whitaker, Emilie. “Social Media—Narrating and Othering Our Selves.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 55-61.

White, Jennifer. 2020. “Suicidology is for Cutting: Epistemic Injustice and Decolonial Critiques.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (5): 75-81. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-53F.

White, Melanie. “Bergson and Bergsonism: A Reply to Riggio.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 40-44.

Widger, Tom. “‘Suicidology as a Social Practice’: A Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 1-4.

Willcutt, Zachary. “The Enframing of the Self as a Problem: Heidegger and Marcel on Modern Technology’s Relation to the Person.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 11-20.

Williams, Damien. “Deleting the Human Clause: A Review of Ashley Shew’s Animal Constructions and Technological Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 2 (2018): 42-44.

Williams, Damien. “Cultivating Technomoral Interrelations: A Review of Shannon Vallor’s Technology and the Virtues.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 2 (2018): 64-69.

Williams, John. “David-Hillel Ruben’s ‘Traditions and True Successors’: A Critical Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 40-45.

Williams, John. “Further Reflection on True Successors and Traditions.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 9 (2013): 12-16.

Williams, John. “True Succession and Inheritance of Traditions: Looking Back on the Debate.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 15-29.

Williams, Pedro Saez. “Natural Authority.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 46-50.

Williams, Pedro Saez. “Pop Sociology: An Explanation of Batman v Superman’s ‘Rotten’ 29%.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 37-51.

Wills, Bernard. “Conservatism: The End of An Idea.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 12 (2017): 7-16.

Wills, Bernard. “Our Weimar Moment: Part One.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 2 (2018): 70-75.

Wills, Bernard. “Our Weimar Moment, Part Two.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 3 (2018): 27-31.

Wills, Bernard. “Our Weimar Moment, Part Three.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 3 (2018): 32-37.

Wills, Bernard. “Why Mizrahi Needs to Replace Weak Scientism With an Even Weaker Scientism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 5 (2018): 18-24.

Wills, Bernard. “On the Limits of Any Scientism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 7 (2018): 34-39.

Wills, Bernard. “Weak Scientism: The Prosecution Rests.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7, no. 10 (2018): 31-36.

Wills, Bernard. “Notes on the Rhetoric of Trolling.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, no. 5 (2019): 1-10.

Wills, Bernard. 2019. “A Pyrrhonist Reply to a Fortrean Review.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (6): 4-10. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4bc.

Wills, Bernard. 2019. “A Pyrrhonist Reply to a Fortrean Review.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (6): 8-15. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4c0.

Wills, Bernard. 2022. “Weaving the World: On James Maffie’s Aztec Philosophy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (7): 33-39. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6ZP.

Wills, Bernard N. 2023. “Believing in Dawkins: A Review of Steinhart.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (11): 83–93. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8iW.

Wills, Bernard N. 2024. “What is an Idol? A Response to Eric Steinhart.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (2): 66–73. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8Be.

Wilson, Catherine. 2109. “Regarding Scientism and the Soul of Philosophy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (11): 55-58. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4Fo.

Winyard, David C. “Review of Steve Fuller, Humanity 2.0: What it Means to be Human Past, Present and Future.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 2 (2013): 16-18.

Winyard, David C. “Polanyi Appeal: A Review of Esther Meek’s Contact With Reality.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 8 (2017): 17-19.

Winyard, David C. “The Promethean Escape.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 1-3.

Wittingslow, Ryan Mitchell. 2020. “Some Thoughts on the Relationship Between Scientism and Empirical Methods in Philosophy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (5): 64-67. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-52Z.

Wojtowicz, Jake. “Disagreeing and Getting to the Truth: A Reply to Sartwell.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 46-50.

Wolf, Michael P. “Rigid Designation and Natural Kind Terms, Pittsburgh Style.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 133-142.

Wolfendale, Peter. “Burning Bridges.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2013).

Wolkenstein, Fabio. 2020. “Further Thoughts on ‘Epistemic Barriers to Rational Voting:’ A Response to Faruk Aksoy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (7): 1-5. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-5bs.

Wolpert, Lewis, Steve Fuller, and Jonathan Derbyshire. 2012. “Hawking vs. Philosophy: Has Science Killed Philosophy?”Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective iai and YouTube video, 33:45. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4B7/.

Wong, Patricia. 2022. “A Few Words on #Trust.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (5): 39-43. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Oi.

Worsnip, Alex. 2022. “Fake News and Epistemic Criticizability: Reflections on Croce and Piazza.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (2): 42-48. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6xD.

Wray, K. Brad. “Collective Knowledge and Collective Justification.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 24-27.

Wright, Travis. 2019. “Out-of-This-Book: A Review of Bruno Latour’s Down to Earth.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (8): 60-61. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4m7.

X

Xin, Wendy. 2024. “Locating the Epistemic Badness of Hate Speech: A Reply to McDonald and Badino.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (3): 33–38. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-8Fz.

Z

Zacharias, Kari. 2019. “Collaborative Review Part 3: What Makes Interdisciplinarity Unique?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (10): 114-117. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4zM.

Zagzebski, Linda T. “Trust in Others and Self-Trust: Regarding Epistemic Authority.“ Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017):56-59.

Zaman, Asad. “On Islamic Political Economy: A Brief Reply to Choudhury.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 89.

Zenker, Frank. “Having Knowledge from Multiple Testimonies: Reply to Tucker’s ‘The Generation of Knowledge from Multiple Testimonies’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 52-55.

Zucker, Julian, Daniel Rassaby, Aja Watkins, and Rory Smead. (2019). “Bargaining and Intersectional Disadvantage: Reply to O’Connor, Bright, and Bruner.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (7): 1-8. https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4ei.