Site Bibliography

This list contains every post on the SERRC, including Collective Vision contributions, Interviews, Book Reviews and General Comment posts.

| A | | B | | C | | D | | E | F | | G | | H | | I | | J | | K | | L | | M | | N | | O | | P | | Q | | R | | S | | T | | U || V | | W | | X | | Y | | Z |


A

Agassi, Joseph. Reply to ‘The Rationality of Extremists’ by John Wettersten.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 2 (2012): 1-4.

Ahern-Dodson, Jennifer. “The role of community in working with faculty writers: Response to ‘The supplementary clerk’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 1-6.

Aikin, Scott F and Thomas Dabay. “Contrastivism and Individualism: A Reply to Sawyer.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 87-90.

Aikin, Scott F and Thomas Dabay. “A Further Note on Individualism and Contrastivism: Reply to Sawyer.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 1-4.

Akera, Atsushi. “An Accidental Scholar: Remarks on the Special Issue on Japanese STS.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 9 (2013): 22-26.

Alex, Jensen, Valerie Joly Chock, Kyle Mallard, and Jonathan Matheson. “A Review of Linda Zagzebski’s Epistemic Authority.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 29-34.

Alfano, Mark. “Becoming Less Unreasonable: A Reply to Sherman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 59-62

Allwood, Carl Martin. “On the virtues of an empirically oriented culture concept and on the limitations of too general and abstract characterizations of understanding.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 6 (2012): 21-26.

Allwood, Carl Martin. “The Role of Culture and Understanding in Research.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 5 (2013): 1-11.

Allwood, Carl Martin. “On the Virtues of an Empirically Oriented Culture Concept and on the Limitations of Too General and Abstract Characterizations of Understanding.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 54-61.

Allwood, Carl Martin. “On the Issue of an Appropriate Culture Concept for the Indigenous Psychologies and on the Limits of Philosophy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 41-48.

Allwood, Carl Martin. “What Type of Culture Concept Will Help the Indigenous Psychologies and Why? An Answer to Hwang.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 44-49.

Allwood, Carl Martin. “Culture, Language, Identity and the Properties of a Useful Culture Concept for the Indigenous Psychologies.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 30-33.

Almassi, Ben. “Comments on Tim Kenyon’s ‘Oral History and the Epistemology of Testimony’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 56-61.

Andersen, Line Edslev. “Community Beliefs and Scientific Change: Response to Gilbert.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 37-46.

Anderson, Derek. “Relevance Theory and Conceptual Competence Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 35-39.

Anderson, Elizabeth. “Reply to John Christman’s Comments.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 7 (2012): 15-16.

Anderson, Warwick.“Taking Science Studies Off the Boyle.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 51-52.

Antony, Louise. “Epistemology or Politics?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 4 (2013): 16-23.

Argamakova, Alexandra. “On the Technoprogressive Declaration.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 1-2.

Argamakova, Alexandra. “Social Epistemology and Its Ways of Setting Policy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2014): 5-8.

Armstrong, Stuart. “Response to the Unilateralist’s Curse.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 33-36

Axtell, Guy. “The ‘Dialectics of Objectivity’?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, No. 7 (2014): 5-7.

Axtell, Guy. A Post-Humanist Paradox? Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 66-68.

Azadegan, Ebrahim. “Islamic Science: A Missed Subject in Bigliardi’s Monograph?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 12-15.

B

Bacevic, Jana. “Solving the Democratic Problem.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 50-52.

Bailey, Alison. “The Unlevel Knowing Field: An Engagement with Dotson’s Third-Order Epistemic Oppression.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 62-68.

Baker, Erik and Naomi Oreskes. “It’s No Game: Post-Truth and the Obligations of Science Studies.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 8 (2017): 1-10.

Baker, Erik and Naomi Oreskes. “Science as a Game, Marketplace or Both: A Reply to Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 65-69.

Bakhurst, David and Sergio Sismondo. “Commentary on Ilya Kasavin’s ‘Towards a Social Philosophy of Science: Russian Prospects’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 4 (2017): 20-23.

Bammer, Gabriele. “Interdisciplining Knowledge or Disciplining Interdisciplinarity? A Reply to Huutoniemi’s “’Interdisciplinarity as Academic Accountability.'” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 1-4.

Barr, Kelli and Wenlong Lu. “Re-engineering Ethics: Pushing Philosophy Outside of its Comfort Zone at the APPE Annual Meeting.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 4 (2013): 24-32.

Basbøll, Thomas. “Quick Reading: Organizing Intelligence.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2012).

Basbøll, Thomas.“I, Social Epistemologist.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 4 (2014): 14-15.

Basham, Lee. “The Need for Accountable Witnesses: A Reply to Dentith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 6-13.

Basham, Lee and Matthew R. X. Dentith. “Social Science’s Conspiracy-Theory Panic: Now They Want to Cure Everyone.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 10 (2016): 12-19.

Basham, Lee. “Between Two Generalisms: A Reply to Stokes.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 12 (2016): 4-12.

Basham, Lee. “Pathologizing Open Societies: A Reply to the Le Monde Social Scientists.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 59-68.

Basham, Lee. “Border Wall Post Truth: Case Study.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 40-49.

Bauer, Henry. “Reply to Ron Westrum.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 12 (2012): 21-23.

Bauer, Henry. “Reply to Krimsky.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 4 (2013): 13-15.

Bavli, Itai and Daniel Steel. “On Community Epistemic Capacity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 34-38.

Beckstein, Martin. “Traditions and True Successors: A Few Pragmatic Considerations” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 30-36.

Beckstein, Martin. “Addressing Ruben’s ‘Internal and External Perspectives’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 35-36.

Beeby, Laura. “Reply to José Medina.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 6 (2012): 27-30.

Beeby, Laura. “Collective resources and collectivity: A reply to José Medina.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 11 (2012): 12-15.

Beisecker, Dave. “Normative Functionalism and its Pragmatist Roots.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 109-116.

Bell, Nathan M. “The Varieties of Hermeneutics and Engaging with Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 2 (2014): 38-39.

Benesch, Philip. “What’s Left of Popper?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 50-61.

Benton, Ted. “Some Comments on Cruickshank and Sassower’s Democratic Problem-Solving: Dialogues in Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 60-65.

Bergamin, Joshua. “To Know and To Be: Second-Person Knowledge and the Intersubjective Self, A Reply to Talbot.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 43-47.

Bernal, Amiel. “The Epistemic Injustice Anthology: A Review of The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice.Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 11 (2017): 1-8.

Bertolotti, Tommaso “Science-Like Gossip, or Gossip-Like Science?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 15-19.

Bigliardi, Stefano. “On Harmonizing Islam and Science: A Response to Edis and a Self-Criticism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 56-68.

Bigliardi, Stefano. “Latour’s Sophistication, Science and the Qur’an as ‘Mere’ Historical Document: A Counter-Reply to Edis.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 34-35.

Bigliardi, Stefano. “Mehdi Golshani’s Philosophy, Islamic Science(s), and Judeo-Christian/Muslim Dialogue: A Reply to Azadegan.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 16-21.

Bigliardi, Stefano. “Reculer Pour Mieux Sauter! Replies to Howard and Hamza.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 30-34.

Bigliardi, Stefano. “What We Talk About When We Talk About Iʿjāz.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 38-45.

Bigliardi, Stefano. “Some Observations on Isra Yazicioglu’s Understanding the Qur’anic Miracle Stories in the Modern Age.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 13-16.

Bigliardi,Stefano. “New Religious Movements, Knowledge, and Science: Towards an Interdisciplinary Discussion.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 32-37.

Bigliardi, Stefano. “I’Jāz, Conspiracy Theories, and Ufology—Some Suggestions with a Touch of Latour.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 11 (2015): 1-7.

Bird, Alexander and James Ladyman. “Free Inquiry: The Haldane Principle and the Significance of Scientific Research.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 14-22.

Bland, Steven.“Pragmatic vs. Dialectical Strategies for Resisting Epistemic Relativism: A Reply to Richard Fumerton.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 37-40.

Bohman, James. “In defense of republican epistemology: Reply to May.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 9 (2012): 42-45.

Bostrom, Nick. “In Defense of Posthuman Dignity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 1-10.

Bowman, W. Derek. “Philosophy Hitherto: A Reply to Frodeman and Briggle.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 85-91.

Breyman, Steve. “The Superior Lie: A Review of The Deceptive Activist. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 11 (2017): 36-38.

Briggle, Adam, Steve Fuller, Britt Holbrook and Veronika Lipinska. “Exchange on Holbrook and Briggle’s ‘Knowing and Acting.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 5 (2013): 38-44.

Brown, Christopher M. “Some Objections to Moti Mizrahi’s ‘What’s So Bad About Scientism?’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 8 (2017): 42-54.

Brown, Keith Wayne, Brighton Dwinnel, Bob Frodeman, Steve Fuller, Lauren Griffith, Carl Jacob, David Silverberg, Natalie Szczechowski, Mike Watson. “A Dialogue Concerning Humanity 2.0.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 33-43.

Brown, Matthew J. “A Critical Appreciation of Ronald N. Giere’s ‘Distributed Cognition without Distributed Knowing’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 45-51.

Brož, Luděk. “I, Too, Have a Dream … About Suicidology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 27-31.

Butler, Jesse. “Knowledge and NOW: What Is the Epistemic Standing of the Present Moment?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 5-11.

Butler, Jesse. “Knowledge, Objects, and the Objective NOW.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 21-25.

Butler, Jesse. “Phenomenal Knowledge, Dualism, and Dreams.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 12-18.

C

Cabrera, Laura. “Visioneering and Our Common Future.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 1-3.

Cahill, Ann. “Difference, Beauvoir, and Irigaray: A Reply to Pohlhaus.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.2 (2014): 66-70.

Caine, Mark. “Social Epistemology, Environmentalism and a Proactionary Human Future: An Interview with Steve Fuller.” 3, no. 11 (2014): 106-121.

Campanini, Massimo. “Science and Epistemology in Medieval Islam.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 20-28.

Carlin, Andrew. “On the Practical Work of Citation: Foundationalism and (Inter)disciplinary Incommensurability.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 11 (2016): 28-40.

Carr, Leah. “Review: Essays in Collective Epistemology.Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 29-32.

Carr, Leah. “Philosophy as Therapy and Philosophical Anthropology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 95-99.

Casper, Stephen T. “The Death of the ‘Book Review’?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 4 (2013): 23-27.

Cassam, Quassim. “Stealthy Vices.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 10 (2015): 19-25.

Castellani, Tommaso, Emanuele Pontecorvo and Adriana Valente. “Epistemological Consequences of Bibliometrics: Insights from the Scientific Community.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 1-20.

Castellani, Tommaso, Emanuele Pontecorvo and Adriana Valente. “Epistemic Consequences of Bibliometric Evaluation: A Reply to Rip and Stöckelová.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 29-33.

Chis, Ioana Cerasella and Justin Cruickshank. “The Cost of Public Intellectuals: Reflections On Raphael Sassower’s Call for Intellectuals To Influence Elites and Their Publics.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 16-26.

Choudhury, Masudul Alam. “Islamic Political Economy: An Epistemological Approach.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 53-103.

Choudhury, Masudul Alam. “A Rejoinder to Zaman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2014): 14-15.

Chuang, Kimberly. “In defense of Elster’s mechanisms.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 9 (2012): 1-19.

Church, George. “Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going? An Interview with George Church, Ryan Cochrane.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 28-30.

Churcher, Millicent. “Adam Smith’s Sympathetic Imagination: A Reply to Lennon.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 63-68.

Clough, Sharyn. “Feminist Theories of Evidence and Biomedical Research Communities: A Reply to Goldenberg.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 72-76.

Coady, David. “Critical reply to ‘Culpability for Epistemic Injustice: Deontic or Aretetic?’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 5 (2012): 3-6.

Coady, David. “Decision-making and Credibility.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 8 (2012): 13-15.

Cochrane, Ryan. “Beyond the Mind-Body Stalemate: An Interview with Stuart Kauffman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 4 (2014): 7-10.

Cochrane, Ryan. “A Conversation with Henry Stapp.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 4 (2014): 11-13.

Code, Lorraine. “Review of Stuart Firestein. Ignorance: How it Drives Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 9 (2012): 53-57.

Collier, James H. “Doing Social Epistemology Socially: A Report.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 1 (2011): 1-4.

Collier, James H. “Normativity and Nostalgia: A Reply to Pitt.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 2 (2012): 26-34.

Collier, James H. “Year one of the SERRC: An interval report.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 12 (2012).

Collin, Finn. “Two Kinds of Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no.8 (2013): 79-104.

Collin, Finn and David Budtz Pedersen. “The Science of Science Policy: A Response to Jesper Eckhardt Larsen.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 1-9.

Collins, Harry. “Collectivities and Tacit Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 26-28.

Collins, Harry. “Knowledge as It Says on the Tin: Response to Moodey.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 50-51.

Combes, Richard E. “McCraw on the Nature of Epistemic Trust.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 76-78.

Combes, Richard. “McCraw on the Nature of Epistemic Trust—Part II.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 7-10.

Corlett, J. Angelo. “On Searle on Human Rights, Again!” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 41-46.

Corlett, J. Angelo. “More on Searle on Human Rights.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 15-36.

Correia, Mara Cristina Salles and Tarcisio Zandonade. “Information as Recorded Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 13-39.

Craddock, Emma. “Reflections on the interdisciplinarity project: A response to an interview with Carl Mitcham and a keynote address by Stephen Frosh.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 1-4.

Craddock, Emma. “Dreaming the Future: What it Means to be Human.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 52-54.

Crease, Robert P. “Response to Ginev, ‘Scrutinizing Scientism from a Hermeneutic Point of View’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 6 (2013): 18-22.

Croker, Trevor. “A More Robust Software Ecology?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 2 (2014): 22-23.

Cruickshank, Justin. “Problem-Solving And The Social Production Of Knowledge: A Reply to Isaac Reed.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.2 (2014): 24-33.

Cruickshank, Justin. “From Ex Cathedra Legislators to Dialogic Exemplars? Popper, Rorty and the Politics and Sociology of Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 1-12.

Cruickshank, Justin. “Public Intellectuals, Education and the Need for Dissatisfaction: Comments on Raphael Sassower’s Discussion of Popper, Rorty and Democracy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 1-4.

Cruickshank, Justin. “Neoliberalism, the ‘Scientific Enterprise’ and the ‘Business of People’: Comments on the Sociology and Politics of Knowledge Production.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 53-65

Cruickshank, Justin and Ioana Cerasella Chis “Exit, Voice and Loyalty in the Public Sphere: On the Hollowing Out of Universities and the ‘Trojan Horse’ Attack on the Muslim Community in the UK.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 57-71.

Cruickshank, Justin and Ioana Cerasella Chis. “Big Data, TTIP and the Hubris of Techno-Capitalism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 45-55.

Cruickshank, Justin. “Meritocracy and Reification.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 4-19.

Cuccio, Claire. “Report on New America Foundation event 9 October 2012.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 11 (2012): 8-9.

D

D’Agostino, Fred. “Reply to Armin Krishnan.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 2 (2013): 24-25.

D’Agostino, Fred. “How Can We Collectivize a Set of Visions about Social Epistemology?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 8 (2014): 5-9.

Dajani, Rana. “A Response to Damian Howard.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 43-44.

D’Amico, Robert. “Reply to Corlett’s ‘Searle on Human Rights.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 30-36.

D’Amico, Robert. “Arguments Concerning Ethical Realism and Rights: A Further Reply to Corlett.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 50-51.

Daneshgar, Majid. “Tantāwī: Western -Eastern Discoveries Embedded in Islam.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.12 (2014): 113-115.

Dastmalchian, Amir. “Islam, Science, and Cognitive-Propositionalism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 122-127.

Daukas, Nancy. “Comments on Karen Jones, ‘The Politics of Intellectual Self-Trust.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 6 (2012): 31-35.

Davidson, Lacey J. and Daniel R. Kelly. “Intuition, Judgment, and the Space Between: A Reply to Sherman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 11 (2015): 15-20.

Davis, William. “Interdisciplinarity and Pedagogy: Disciplining Collaboration in Academia. An Interview with Carl Mitcham.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2012).

Davis, William, Martin Evenden, Gregory Sandstrom and Aliaksandr Puptsau. “Are MOOCs the Future of Higher Education? A Collective Judgment Forum.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 23-27.

Davis, William. “Philosophy of Technology Un-Disciplined.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 12-13.

Davis, William, Susan Dieleman, Robert Frodeman, Francis Remedios, Adam Riggio, Elisabeth Simbürger, Todd Suomela. Sustainable Knowledge: An Exchange.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 4 (2014): 11-20.

Davis, William. “Moving Beyond the Human: Posthumanism, Transhumanism and Objects.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 9-14.

De Caro, Mario. “Free Will as an Illusion: Ethical and Epistemological Consequences of an Alleged Revolutionary Truth.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 40-50.

de Laat, Paul and Nicholas Munn. “Online Encyclopaedias: An Exchange.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 3 (2012): 10-13.

Dentith, Matthew R.X. “Treating Conspiracy Theories Seriously: A Reply to Basham on Dentith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 1-5.

Dentith, Matthew R. X. “In Defence of Particularism: A Reply to Stokes.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 11 (2016): 27-33.

Dentith, Matthew R. X. and Martin Orr. “Clearing Up Some Conceptual Confusions About Conspiracy Theory Theorising.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 1 (2017): 9-16.

Dentith, Matthew R. X. “Conspiracy Theories and Their Investigator(s).” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 4 (2017): 4-11.

de Ridder, Jeroen. ”Science and Scientism in Popular Science Writing.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 23-39.

DeVasto, Danielle. “Matters of Concern and the Politics of Who: A Response to Herndl.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 14-17.

deVries, Willem A. “Sellars, Realism and Kanitan Thinking.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 57-67.

Dew, Kevin. “Public Health and the Necessary Limits of Advocacy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 26-29.

Dieguez, Sebastian, Gérald Bronner, Véronique Campion-Vincent, Sylvain Delouvée, Nicolas Gauvrit, Anthony Lantian & Pascal Wagner-Egger. “’They’ Respond: Comments on Basham et al.’s ‘Social Science’s Conspiracy-Theory Panic: Now They Want to Cure Everyone’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 12 (2016): 20-39.

Dieleman, Susan. “Review Essay of ‘Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance.’ and ‘Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 2 (2012): 11-25.

Dieleman, Susan. “The ‘Scientific Context’ in an ‘Innovation Economy.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 6 (2012): 1-2.

Dieleman, Susan. “Social Epistemology as Public Philosophy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 69-71.

Douglas, Conor M.W. “Response to Leonie van Drooge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 103-105.

Dragos, Chris. “Justified Group Belief in Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 6-12.

Dufour, Monique, Gregory Sandstrom and Adam Riggio. “Beyond Polemic, Part, III.” Review of The Science Delusion, by Curtis White. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 22-28.

Dusek, Val. “Review of Dissent on Descent by Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 3 (2012): 35-45.

Dusek, Val. “Regarding Alternative Scientific Theories: A Reply to Pigliucci.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 10-14.

E

Earle, Joshua. “Visioneering a Better Future: The Hieroglyph Project, STS, and the Future of Science and Technology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 67-83.

Edis, Taner. “On Harmonizing Religion and Science: A Reply to Bigliardi.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.2 (2014): 40-43.

Edis, Taner. “An Invitation to Science?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 8 (2014): 3-4.

Egert, Philip R. “A conversation with David Hess about ‘Neoliberalism and the History of STS Theory’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 7-12.

Eglash, Ron. “On Intellectual Courage and Accountability.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 21-25.

Elías, Carol Pérez and Jesús Zamora Bonilla. “From Science in the Papers to Science in the News.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 55-66.

Elqayam, Shira. “Instrumental Bounded and Grounded Rationality: Comments on Lockie.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 11 (2015): 47-51.

Evans, Dylan. “Review of, and Exchange on, Fuller and Lipińska.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 84-89.

Evenden, Martin. “Metaphor and Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 37-40.

F

Fagan, Melinda. “Social Mechanisms and Explanatory Pluralism: Reflections on the Persson-Little-Chuang Debate.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 6-11.

Fagan, Melinda. “Collective Vision of Objects of Inquiry: Some Preliminary Thoughts.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 27-29.

Fantl, Jeremy. “Interest-Relativity and Testimony.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 11 (2015): 40-46

Faulkner, Paul. “Trust and the Assessment of Credibility.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 8 (2012): 1-6.

Faulkner, Paul. “Two-Stage Reliabilism, Virtue Reliabilism, Dualism and the Problem of Sufficiency.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 121-138.

Fellows, Jennifer Jill. “Eddies and Currents: A Reply to Sassower.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 29-37.

Fitzpatrick, Scott, Claire Hooker and Ian Kerridge “‘Suicidology as a Social Practice’: A Reply to Tom Widger.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 44-48.

Fowler, Bridget. “Jeremy Lane’s Comments on the Bourdieu and Language Debate: A Brief Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 1-4.

Freedman, Karyn L. “Group Accountability Versus Justified Belief: A Reply to Kukla.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 6-12.

Frodeman, Maya. “A Challenge for Frodeman and Briggle.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 30-33.

Frodeman, Robert. “Evaluating the Profession of Philosophy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 23-25.

Frodeman, Robert. “Anti-Fuller: Transhumanism and the Proactionary Imperative.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 38-43.

Frodeman, Robert. “Socratics and Anti-Socratics: The Status of Expertise.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 42-44.

Fricker, Miranda. “How is hermeneutical injustice related to ‘white ignorance’? Reply to José Medina’s ‘Hermeneutical Injustice and Polyphonic Contextualism: Social Silences and Shared Hermeneutical Responsibilities’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 49-53.

Frosh, Stephen. “Falling into the Gaps.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 2 (2013): 12-15.

Fuller, Steve. “Christmas Greetings.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2012).

Fuller, Steve. “Against consensus — but to what end? Reply to Riggio.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 3 (2013): 25-31.

Fuller, Steve. “The Origin and Prospect of a Principled Future: An Interview with Steve Fuller, Ryan Cochrane.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 6 (2013): 12-17.

Fuller, Steve. “World Enough and Time.” Review of Time Reborn: From the Crisis in Physics to the Future of the Universe, by Lee Smolin. Social Epismteology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 12-13.

Fuller, Steve. “Intellectuals as both Dangerous and Endangered.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 18-20.

Fuller, Steve. “What Does It Mean to be an Intellectual Today? An Interview with Steve Fuller by Filip Šimetin Šegvić.” Social Epismtemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 12-17.

Fuller, Steve. “Christmas Greetings 2013.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2013).

Fuller, Steve. “‘Personhood Beyond the Human’: Reflections on an Important Conference.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 2 (2014): 1-11.

Fuller, Steve. “Towards a Proactionary Welfare State.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.5 (2014): 82-84.

Fuller, Steve. “Social Epistemology: The Future of an Unfulfilled Promise.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 29-37.

Fuller, Steve. “Science Without Expertise: Defending My Defence of Intelligent Design (Nearly) a Decade Later.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 22-29.

Fuller, Steve. “Why Superintelligence May Not Help Us Think about Existential Risks—or Transhumanism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 47-49.

Fuller, Steve. “Who Needs the Science Wars When You’ve Got This on the Homefront?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 40-42

Fuller, Steve and Veronika Lipinska. “Transhumanism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 25-29.

Fuller, Steve. “My One Habit: Never Speak from a Prepared Written Text.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 10-13.

Fuller, Steve. “A Robust Challenge to the Value of a University Education.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 10-11.

Fuller, Steve. “Markets as Educators, or Have We Always Been Neo-Liberal?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 29-30.

Fuller, Steve. “‘Is Science Out of Control?’ A Failed Book Proposal.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 48-51.

Fuller, Steve. Interview with Mike Neary. “What’s Left of the Academy? Leadership, Intellectuality and the Prospects for Mass Change.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 22-25.

Fuller, Steve. “Prolegomena to the Deep Sociology of Brexit: The Long Road Back to Pareto.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 1-5.

Fuller, Steve. “Counterfactuals in the White House:  A Glimpse into Our Post-Truth Times.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 1-3.

Fuller, Steve. “What are You Playing At? On the Use and Abuse of Games in STS.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 39-49.

Fuller, Steve. “How to Study: Roam, Record and Rehearse.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 62-64.

Fuller, Steve. “Veritism as Fake Philosophy: Reply to Baker and Oreskes.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 47-51.

Fumerton, Richard. “Fundamental vs. Derivative; Useful vs. Useless: A Response to Bland.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 56-59.

G

Gallois, Cindy. “Social Licence to Operate as Intergroup Communication: A Comment on the Special Issue Edited by Rooney, Leach, and Ashworth.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 51-54.

Garson, Justin. “Realism, Conventionalism, and Irrealism about Biological Functions: A Reply to Schyfter.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 77-81.

Gaudet, Joanne. “Absence and Presence in Science: Critical Reply to the Special Issue on ‘Absences’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 4 (2014): 16-23.

Gelfert, Axel. “Symbol Systems as Collective Representational Resources: Mary Hesse, Nelson Goodman, and the Problem of Scientific Representation.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 52-61.

Gilbert. Margaret. “Scientists Are People Too: Comment on Andersen.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 45-49.

Gille, Zsuzsa. “Is there an emancipatory ontology of matter? A response to Myra Hird.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 4 (2013): 1-6.

Ginev, Dimitri. “Reply to Robert Crease.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 9 (2013): 27-32.

Goldberg, Sanford C. “‘Analytic Social Epistemology’ and the Epistemic Significance of Other Minds.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 26-48.

Goldberg, Sanford C. “Diversity in Epistemic Communities: A Response to Clough.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 25-30.

Goldenberg, Maya J. “Diversity in Epistemic Communities: A Response to Clough.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 25-30.

Golshani, Mehdi. “Some Clarifications Concerning My Views about Science and Religion.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 90-91.

Gorton, William. “Popper’s Realism, the Rationality Principle and Rational Choice Theory: Discussion of “The Rationality Principle Idealized” by Boaz Miller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 3 (2012): 18-23.

Graham, Peter, Zachary Bachman, Meredith McFadden, Megan Stotts. “Epistemic Evaluations: Consequences, Costs and Benefits.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 7-13.

Gramelsberger, Gabriele. “Symbol Systems as Cognitive and Performative Hybrids: A Reply to Axel Gelfert.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 89-94.

Grundmann, Reiner. “Regarding Experts and Expertise: A Reply to Szymanski.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 19-22.

Gui, Angela. “Extended Personal Identity in the 21st Century.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no 11 (2015): 8-14.

Gulick, Walter. “On Moodey’s Response with Additional Comments Toward Understanding the Tacit.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 6-11.

H

Hackett, Joshua. “Funes, Digitized: Borges as a Guide to Fractured Digital Identities.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 1-10.

Hagen, Kurtis. “What Are They Really Up To? Activist Social Scientists Backpedal on Conspiracy Theory Agenda.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 89-95.

Halffman, Willem and Hans Radder. “International Responses to the Academic Manifesto: Reports from 14 Countries.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective Special Report (2017): 1-77.

Hamati-Ataya, Inanna. “Before Social Epistemology: On the Limited Efficacy of ‘The Scandal’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.2 (2014): 44-48.

Hamza, Abdelhaq M. “Faith and Reason: The Re-Emergence of Neo-Mu’tazilite Thought in the Discourse of Modern Muslim Scientists.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 53-55.

Hamza, Abdelhaq M. “Whither Muslim Scholarship? A Reply to Jamal Mimouni Regarding Faith and Reason.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 73-84.

Harding, Sandra. “An Organic Logic of Research: A Response to Posey and Navarro.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 22-25

Harré, Rom. “A Reply to Kasavin’s ‘Philosophical Realism’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 21-25.

Hartelius, E. Johanna and Gordon R. Mitchell. “NCA-Forum Double Session on Scholarly Metrics in a Digital Age.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 1-29.

Hashemi, Morteza. “From Ibn Khaldun’s Point of View Fidel is Not Dead: Or, What Does the Rise of The Donald Tell Us About the Future?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 12 (2016): 13-16.

Henderson, Jen. “The gastronomy of writing: Copenhagen, Denmark October 17-20, 2012.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 12 (2012): 7-9.

Henriksen, Dorte. “Reply to Liberman and López Olmedo’s ‘Psychological Meaning of “Coauthorship” Among Scientists’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 20-22.

Herndl, Carl G. “Doing and Knowing in the L’Aquila Case.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 1-6.

Hess, David. “Reply to Libby Schweber’s Comments on ‘Neoliberalism and the History of STS Theory’, David J. Hess.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, 10 (2013): 32-37.

Hilgartner, Stephen. “Studying Absences of Knowledge: Difficult Subfield or Basic Sensibility?Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 84-88.

Hird, Myra J. “Is waste indeterminacy useful? A response to Zsuzsa Gille.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 6 (2013): 28-33.

Hird, Myra J. “Planetary Messmates: Engaging with Elizabeth Mazzolini and Philip Olson on the Topic of Waste.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 52-57.

Hofmänner, Alexandra. “Science Studies Elsewhere: The Experimental Life and the Other Within.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 1-26.

Hofmänner, Alexandra. “Response to Anderson and Khandekar.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 44-52.

Holbrook, Dwight. “What is an Object?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 35-38.

Holbrook, Dwight. “Closing in on Dualism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 57-62.

Holbrook, J. Britt. “Fuller’s Categorical Imperative: The Will to Proaction.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 20-26.

Holbrook, J. Britt and Adam Briggle. “Knowing and acting: The precautionary and proactionary principles in relation to policy making.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 5 (2013): 15-37.

Holbrook, Dwight. “Coming Back to What Started It All.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 63-68.

Howard, Damian. “Some Reflections on Stefano Bigliardi’s ‘On Harmonizing Islam and Science.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 50-52.

Huutoniemi, Katri. “On the Value of Interdisciplinary Integration: A Response to Michael O’Rourke.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 88-92.

Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. “The construction of culture-inclusive theories by multiple philosophical paradigms.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 46-58.

Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. “Science as a Culture in Culture with Deep-Structure Across Empirical Studies in Psychology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 38-51.

Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. “A Disciplinary Horizon for Comprehending the Third Wave of Psychology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 44-55.

Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. “All Roads Lead To Rome.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 56-66.

Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. “Preserving Cultural Identity and Subjectivity for a Psychology of Multiculturalism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 7-14.

Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. “Outside Observer vs. Inside Doer: Divergent Perspectives on ‘Culture’ in the Indigenization Movement of Psychology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 92-103.

I

Inglis, David. “Twisting the Stick: A Reply to Jeremy Lane.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 66-68.

Irwin, Alan. “Agreeing to Differ? A Response to Van Bouwel and Van Oudheusden.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 11-14.

J

Jaworski, Katrina. “Divorcing Suicidology, Ethically.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 18-25.

Jones, Karen. “Reply to Nancy Daukas.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 11 (2012): 1-7.

Jones, Peter E. “Reality check: Some thoughts in response to Pablé.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 16-19.

Jones-Katz, Gregory. “On How (Not) to Turn the Senses into Food for Thought; or, When Context is King.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 1 (2011): 5-13.

Johnson, Nathan R. and Damien Smith Pfister. “‘Ecologizing’ Berry’s Computational Ecology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 4 (2013): 7-9.

K

Kaiser, David. “Déjà vu all over again? A response to Philip Mirowski.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 2 (2013): 1-7.

Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang. “Collaboration, Reward and the Digital Humanities: Reply to Nyhan.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 23-26

Kamal, Abdali S. “On Bigliardi’s Islam and the Quest for Modern Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 55-56.

Kasavin, Ilya. “Reply to Rockmore.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 2 (2013): 26-29.

Kasavin, Ilya. “A Further Reply to Rockmore.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 5 (2013): 12-14.

Kasavin, Ilya. “Cases of Interdisciplinarity: Between Habitus and Reflexion.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 15-30.

Kasavin, Ilya. “Reply to Rom Harré.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 34-37.

Kasavin, Ilya. “A Brief Comment on the Moodey – Collins Exchange on Tacit Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 18.

Kasavin, Ilya. “Why so Romantic and A Priori? A Reply to Bakhurst and Sismondo.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 20-22.

Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal. “Reply to ‘What Constitutes “Good” Evidence for Public Health and Social Policy Making? From Hierarchies to Appropriateness’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 51-55.

Kaufman, Daniel A. “Philosophy’s Academic Viability: A Reply to Frodeman, Briggle and Holbrook.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 3 (2013): 1-5.

Kemp, Stephen. “On Popper, Problems and Problem-Solving: A Review of Cruickshank and Sassower’s Democratic Problem-Solving. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 27-34.

Kerr, Eric. “Are You Thinking What We’re Thinking.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 5-13.

Khandekar, Aalok. “Lost in Nowhere.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 8-9.

Kidd, Ian James. “How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology? A Reply to Pigliucci.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 11-17.

Kidd, Ian James. “Cranks, Pluralists, and Epistemic Vices.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 7-9.

Kidd, Ian James. “Capital Epistemic Vices.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 8 (2017): 11-16.

Kim, Kyung-Man. “Why is Epistemology Still Relevant to the Sociology of Science? Comments on Kale-Lostuvali’s ‘Two Sociologies of Science in Search of Truth’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 29-33.

Kinchy, Abby. “Explaining Absolute Absences: A Critical Reply to Scott Frickel.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 4 (2014): 24-29.

Kindi, Vasso. “The Role of Evidence in Judging Kuhn’s Model: On the Mizrahi, Patton, Marcum Exchange.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 11 (2015): 25-33.

Kirmani, M. Zaki. “The Aligarh School of Islam and Science Studies: Understanding its Background and Distinctive Features.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 10 (2015): 33-46.

Kirmani, M. Zaki “Can Science Halt Islamic Extremism?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 16-18.

Klausen, Søren Harnow. “No Cause for Epistemic Alarm: Radically Collaborative Science, Knowledge and Authorship.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 38-61.

Klausen, Søren Harnow. “New Practices, Open Questions: A Reply to Bertolotti.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 35-38.

Koop, Gerrit. “Is Quantification the Key? A Reply to Nederbragt.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 8 (2014): 1-2.

Kouri, Scott. “Nomad Suicidology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 66-75.

Kral, Michael J. “Critical Suicidology as an Alternative to Mainstream Revolving-Door Suicidology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 10-11.

Krimsky, Sheldon. “The Organized Skepticism of Science: A Review of Bauer.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 4 (2013): 10-12.

Krishnan, Armin. “Response to Fred D’Agostino’s ‘Disciplinarity and the Growth of Knowledge.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 2 (2013): 19-23.

Krishnan, Armin. “Organizing Science: A Further Reply to Fred D’Agostino.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 3 (2013): 19-21.

Kukla, Rebecca. “Commentary on Karyn Freedman, ‘Testimony and Risk: The Dependence Account.'” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 46-52.

Kukla, Rebecca. “A Further Look at Standards of Justification.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 63-65.

L

Landau-Halpern, Beth. “The Costs and Consequences of Teaching and Analyzing Alternative Medicine.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 42-45.

Lang, James C. “Situated Ignoramuses.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 5 (2012): 7-12.

Lang, James C. “Ignorare Aude! (Dare to be Ignorant! –Pace Kant).” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 5-10.

Lane, Jeremy F. “Bourdieu’s Theory of Linguistic Exchange: Realistic Description or Exclusionary Prescription?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 60-65.

Lane, Jeremy F. “Bourdieu, Science and Democracy: A Reply to Bridget Fowler and David Inglis.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 2 (2014): 12-16.

Larsen, Jesper Eckhardt. “Comment on Finn Collin and David Budtz Pedersen: ‘The Frankfurt School, Science and Technology Studies, and the Humanities.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 27-34.

Leach, Joan. “A Comic Moment for Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 62-64.

Lebens, Samuel. “True Successors and Counterfactual Approval.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 26-31.

Lebens, Samuel. “Counterfactual Approval and Idiosyncratic Counterfactual Approval.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 65-69.

Lee, Clarissa Ai Ling. “Why Do Critical Science Studies? A Prolegomena.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 51-55.

Lee, Clarissa Ai Ling. “Review of Making Medical Knowledge by Miriam Solomon.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 1 (2017): 1-8.

Lennon, Kathleen. “Changing Imaginaries: A Reply to Churcher.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 19-23.

Lepock, Chris. “Norms and the Temptations of Relativism: A Reply to Sankey.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 37-42.

Levy, Neil. “The Bad News About Fake News.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 8 (2017): 20-36.

Linker, Maureen. “Considering Online News Comments: Are We Really So Irrational and Hate Filled?Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 1-10.

Little, Daniel. “Social Mechanisms and Scientific Realism: Discussion of ‘Mechanistic Explanation in Social Contexts’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1 , no. 3. (2012): 1-5.

Little, Daniel. “More challenges for social mechanisms: Contribution to the Persson-Chuang discussion.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 9 (2012): 28-32.

Little, Daniel. “Disaggregating Historical Explanation: The Move to Social Mechanisms in the Philosophy of History.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 1-7.

Littlejohn, Clayton. “A Note Concerning Conciliationism and Self-Defeat: A Reply to Matheson.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 104-112.

Lobo, Gregory J. “Reason, Morality and Recognition: On Searle’s Theory of Human Rights.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 22-28.

Lockie, Robert. “Response to Elqayam, Nottelmann, Peels and Vahid on My Paper ‘Perspectivism, Deontologism and Epistemic Poverty’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 21-47.

Loginov, Eugene. “Steve Fuller on Proofs for God’s Existence: An Interview.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 12 (2016): 1-3.

Losh, Elizabeth. “Hashtag Feminism and Twitter Activism in India.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 10-22.

Lower, Erika. “Review of David Toomey, Weird Life: The Search for Life That Is Very,Very Different from Our Own.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 3 (2013): 6-7.

Lowery, Rebecca. “Our Filtered Lives: The Tension Between Citizenship and Instru-mentality.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 21-34.

Loy, Taylor. “Life at the Speed of Light: From the Double Helix to the Dawn of Digital Life, J. Craig Venter.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 31-34.

Lukes, Steven. “How Relativist Should We Be? A Reply to Stenmark.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 13-16.

Luyando, Alberto. “Event Review: Can We Imagine Our Way to a Better Future?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 39-41.

Lynch, William T. “Darwinian Social Epistemology: Science and Religion as Evolutionary Byproducts Subject to Cultural Evolution.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 26-68.

Lynch, William T. “Complexity, Natural Selection, and Cultural Evolution.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 64-72.

Lyne, John. “Having ‘A Whole Battery of Concepts’: Thinking Rhetorically About the Norms of Reason.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 143-148.

M

Macfarlane, Allison. “Nuclear impacts: Uranium, waste, and nuclearity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 5 (2012): 1-2.

MacFarlane, James Michael. “Boundary Work: Post- and Transhumanism, Part I.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 52-56

Machin, Amanda. “Knowledge of Climates and Climates of Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 40-42.

Malloggi, Francesca. “The Value of Privacy for Social Relationships.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 68-77.

Maher, Chauncey. “Normative Functionalism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 13-15.

Maher, Chauncey. “Normative Functionalism about Intentional Action.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 100-108.

Maher, Chauncey. “Reply to Reider.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 11 (2012): 16-23.

Majdik, Zoltan. ‘Reply to Derek Ross’ “Ambiguous Weighting and Nonsensical Sense” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 3 (2012): 24-28.

Majdik, Zoltan. “Expertise as Practice: A Response to DeVasto.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 11 (2016): 1-6.

Malapi-Nelson, Alcibiades. “Some Clarifying Points Regarding Shiffman’s Criticism of Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 1-5.

Manzo, Gianluca. “Reputation and Social Mechanisms: A Comment on Origgi’s ‘A Social Epistemology of Reputation’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 5 (2013): 45-50.

Marcum, James A. “What’s the Support for Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis? A Response to Mizrahi and Patton.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 51-62.

Margolis, Joseph. “A Response to a Question Regarding ‘Normative Functionalism.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 98-99.

Maring, Luke. “Abandoning the Academy is the Single Worst Thing Philosophers Could Do: A Reply to Frodeman and Briggle.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 54-58

Markova, Lyudmila. “Are Consensus and Pluralism Compatible? A Reply to Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 35-39.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “On the Individualistic Orientation of Social Epistemology: A Reply to Sanford Goldberg.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 9 (2013): 17-21.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “Context and Naturalism in Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 9 (2013): 33-35.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “The Beginning in Science and Humanity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 4-6.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “New people and a new type of communication.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 47-53.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “The Humanisation of the Surrounding World and the Technisation of Humans.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 49-52.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “Understanding, Not Only Cognition.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 52-55.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “A Brief Reply to Maya Frodeman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 53-54.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “Comments on Steve Fuller’s Presentation in Moscow.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 1-4.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “Comment on ‘Scientist as Fiction Writer: Soviet Science-Fiction and Space Exploration'”. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 56.

Markova, Lyudmila. “A New Look at Known Issues.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 1-5.

Markova, Lyudmila. “A Reply to Fuller’s Prolegomena.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 52-53.

Markova, Lyudmila A. “Material Carriers of Thought.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 11-20.

Markova, Lyudmila. “Transhumanism in the Context of Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 50-53.

Marsh, Ian. “‘Critical Suicidology’: Toward an Inclusive, Inventive and Collaborative (Post) Suicidology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 5-9.

Marshall, Sandra. “A Problem for the Social Sciences: A Comment on James McCollum on Hermeneutical Injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 7 (2012): 21-23.

Martin, Brian. “Public Health and Academic Freedom.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 44-49.

Martin, Brian. “An Experience with Vaccination Gatekeepers.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 10 (2016): 27-33.

Martini, Carlo. “The Problem of Disagreement and Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective. 3, no. 8, 22-24.

Martini, Carlo. “Review of Jonathan Matheson’s The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 29-32.

Mateo Dieste, Josep Lluís. “Anthropocentrism and Divine Objectivity. Some Observations on the Logic Behind the ‘Scientific Miracle of the Qur’an’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 10 (2015): 8-9.

Matheson, Jonathan. “A Puzzle About Disagreement and Rationality.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 4 (2014): 1-3.

Matheson, Jonathan. “Epistemic Norms and Self-Defeat: A Reply to Littlejohn.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 26-32.

Matheson, Jonathan and Katie V. Rivers. “Taking Issue: A Review of Bryan Frances’ Disagreement. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 7-9.

Martin, Brian. “Constructing and Investigating Absences in Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 73-81.

May, Simon Căbulea. “Bohman on domination and epistemic injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 8 (2012): 7-12.

Mazzolini, Elizabeth. “The Costs of Inhuman Epistemology: A Response to Myra Hird and Zsuzsa Gille.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 31-34.

McCauley, Jaime. “Using Institutional Ethnography to Examine the Social Organization of Absence.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 8 (2014): 22-27.

McCollum, James. “Fleshing out the structural aspects of hermeneutical injustice.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 9 (2012): 33-36.

McCraw, Benjamin. “Thinking Through Social Epistemology: A Reply to Combes, Smolkin, and Simmons.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 1-12.

McCraw, Benjamin W. “Combes on McCraw on the Nature of Epistemic Trust: A Rejoinder.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 28-31.

Medina, José. “Reply to Laura Beeby.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 6 (2012): 36-38.

Medvecky, Fabien. “Economics, Science and the Spandrels of San Marco.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 20-22.

Medvecky, Fabien. “Transgressions and the Scientific Knower.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 37-40.

Medvecky, Fabien. “Knowing From Others—A Review of Knowledge on Trust: A Critical Introduction to Testimony. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 11-12.

Mills, Charles W. “White Ignorance and Hermeneutical Injustice: A Comment on Medina and Fricker.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 38-43.

Miller, Boaz. “Reply to William Gorton.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 4 (2012): 1-2.

Miller, Boaz, Matthew J. Brown, Sanford Goldberg, and Kareem Khalifa. “On Analytic Social Epistemology and Fuller’s Critique: An Exchange.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2013).

Miller, Daniel P. “SIREN 2015 Keynote Address Review: The Nuclearity of Disaster.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 31-35.

Miller, Daniel P.“SIREN 2015 Lecture Review: ‘The Last Resort at Fukushima Daiichi’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 49-53.

Miller, Daniel P. “SIREN 2015 Lecture Review: ‘Leading and Communicating when Technology Fails’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 20-24.

Miller, Daniel P. “SIREN 2015 Lecture Review: The Unthinkable Organization.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 35-39.

Miller, Daniel P. “SIREN 2015 Lecture Review: Nuclear Leadership.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 1-6.

Miller, Seumas. “Joint Epistemic Action and Collective Moral Responsibility: Reply to Andras Szigeti.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 40-50.

Milojevic, Miljana. “The Problem of Translation and Knowledge Transfer.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 10 (2015): 47-50.

Mimouni, Jamal. “A Reply to Hamza’s ‘Faith and Reason: The Re-Emergence of Neo-Mu’tazilite Thought in the Discourse of Modern Muslim Scientists’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 5-9.

Mizrahi, Moti. “A Reply to Patton’s ‘Incommensurability and the Bonfire of the Meta-Theories’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 10 (2015): 51-53.

Mizrahi, Moti. “A Reply to James Marcum’s ‘What’s the Support for Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis?’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 11 (2015): 21-24.

Mizrahi, Moti. “In Defense of Weak Scientism: A Reply to Brown.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 11 (2017): 9-22.

Moodey, Richard W. “Models of Face-to-Face Interaction and the Epistemic Significance of Other Minds.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 19-28.

Moodey, Richard W. “Relating Polanyi’s Tacit Dimension to Social Epistemology: A Response to Walter Gulick” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 1-6.

Moodey, Richard W. “Response to Gulick: Complementarity, Fault Lines, Terminology, Metaphors and Assertions.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 15-20.

Moodey, Richard W. “Performing Knowing: A Reply to Collins.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 42-43.

Moodey, Richard W. “The Fault-Line Remains: A Reply to Collins.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 13-17.

Morgan, Marcus. “Between Cabbages and Kings: Speaking Across Forms of Life.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 24-29

Moss, Pamela. “Reading and Writing Across (Epistemological) Boundaries.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 46-54.

Munn, Nicholas and Paul de Laat. “Social Epistemology and Social Media: An Exchange.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective.

Murguía, Adriana and Melissa Orozco. “Social Epistemology Past, Present and Future: An Interview with Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.2 (2014): 58-65.

N

Nanda, Meera. “Saffronized Science: Rampant Pseudoscience in ‘Vedic Garb’ in the Indian Subcontinent.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 39-47.

Navarro, María G. “How to Interpret Collective Aggregated Judgements?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 27-28.

Navarro, María G. “Poor People of the World Unite! Poverty and the Future of Research in Heuristics.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 2 (2014): 19-21.

Navarro María G. “A Principled Standpoint: A Reply to Sandra Harding.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 17-23.

Nelson, Gregory. “Report on Michael Hardt Lecture.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2012).

Nelson, Gregory. “Putting The Deceptive Activist into Conversation: A Review and a Response to Rappert.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 11 (2017): 33-35.

Norrie, Stephen. “Three Social Contracts for an Academic Collective.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 1 (2011): 14-24.

Norrie, Stephen. “Can Critical Theory be Computerised and Collectivised?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 32-36.

Norrie, Stephen. “So, What Is a Research University? A Review of Chad Wellmon’s Organizing Enlightenment.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 31-38.

Nottelmann, Nikolaj. “Epistemic Poverty, Internalism, and Justified Belief: A Response to Robert Lockie.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 12-28.

Nottelmann, Nikolaj. “Epistemic Poverty, Subjectivism, and the Concept of Epistemic Justification. An Additional Reply to Lockie.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 7-15.

Nuzzo, Angelica. “The Social Dimension of Dialectical Truth: Hegel’s Idea of Objective Spirit.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 10-25.

Nyhan, Julianne. “‘Scholarly Labour and Digital Collaboration in Literary Studies’: An Invited Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 23-28.

O

Olson, Philip R. “Knowing ‘Necro-Waste’: A Reply to Hird.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 59-63.

Olson, Philip R. “Wanting to Believe and the Burden of Knowing.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 58-60.

Olson, Philip R. “Refining and Extending Necro-Waste.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 5-9.

Origgi, Gloria. “Reply to Paul Faulkner’s Comments.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 10 (2012): 1-3.

O’Rourke, Michael. “A Reply to Katri Huutoniemi’s ‘Interdisciplinarity as Academic Accountability.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 10 (2015): 26-32.

Orozco, Mel. “Visioneering Ourselves as Social Epistemologists.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014), 16-18.

Ottinger, Gwen. “Absence and Expectation.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 8 (2014): 10-12.

P

Pablé, Adrian. “Reality Re-Checked and Galileo Re-Integrated: A Reply to Jones and Spurrett.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.2 (2014): 49-57.

Padilla Cruz, Manuel. “On the Usefulness of the Notion of ‘Conceptual Competence Injustice’ to Linguistic Pragmatics.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 4 (2017): 12-19.\

Palermos, Orestis and Duncan Pritchard. “Extended Knowledge and Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 105-120.

Parkhurst, Justin O and Sudeepa Abeysinghe. “What Constitutes ‘Good’ Evidence for Public Health and Social Policy Making? From Hierarchies to Appropriateness.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no 10 (2014): 40-52.

Parkhurst, Justin. “Posing Questions, Eschewing Hierarchies: A Response to Katikireddi.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 62-67.

Parray, Tauseef Ahmad. “Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan (1817-1898) on Taqlid, Ijtihad, and Science-Religion Compatibility.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 19-34.

Patton, Lydia. “Incommensurability and the Bonfire of the Meta-Theories: Response to Mizrahi.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 51-58.

Pauleen, David David Roone and Ali Intezari. “Big Data, Little Wisdom: Trouble Brewing? Ethical Implications for the Information Systems Discipline.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 9-33.

Payton, Jonathan. “Ruben’s account of traditions and true successors: Two modifications and an extension.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 40-46.

Payton, Jonathan. “Keeping Successorhood and Inheritance Apart: A Reply to Lebens and Ruben.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 14-19.

Peake, Victoria. “The Value of Imagining the Trans/Posthuman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 11 (2013): 13-15.

Pedersen, David Budtz. “Who Should Govern the Welfare State 2.0? A Comment on Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 51-59.

Pedersen, David Budtz. “A Social Epistemology for Scientific Excellence.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 64-65.

Peels, Rik. “Let’s Bite the Bullet on Deontological Epistemic Justification: A Response to Robert Lockie.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 42-49.

Penrod, Joshua. “Has the Time Come for New Starting Points? Reply to David Hess’ ‘Neoliberalism and the history of STS Theory: Toward a Reflexive Sociology.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 1-6.

Persson, Johannes. “Social laws should be conceived as a special case of mechanisms: A reply to Daniel Little.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 7 (2012): 12-14.

Persson, Johannes. “Social mechanisms and explaining how: A reply to Kimberly Chuang.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 9 (2012): 37-41.

Phillips, Amanda. “Playing the Game in a Post-Truth Era.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 54-5

Pigliucci, Massimo. “Was Feyerabend Right in Defending Astrology? A Commentary on Kidd.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 5 (2016): 1-6.

Pigliucci, Massimo. “How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology? A Further Reply to Kidd.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 10-16.

Pigliucci, Massimo. “Feyerabend and the Cranks: A Response to Shaw.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2016): 1-6.

Piraino, Francesco. “Bruno Guiderdoni—Among Sufism, Traditionalism and Science: A Reply to Bigliardi.Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 21-24.

Pitt, Joseph C. “Standards in Science and Technology Studies.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 1 (2011): 25-38.

Pittman, Jason M. “Trust and Transhumanism: An Analysis of the Boundaries of Zero-Knowledge Proof and Technologically Mediated Authentication.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 21-29.

Podosky, Paul-Mikhail Catapang and William Tuckwell. “There’s No Such Thing as Conceptual Competence Injustice: A Response to Anderson and Cruz.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 11 (2017): 23-32.

Pohlhaus, Gaile Jr. “On Subjects, Objects, and Others.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 44-50.

Popova, Evgeniya and Elena Simakova. “Common Vision in a Non-Community.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 52-54.

Posey, Kamili and María G. Navarro. “Review of Sandra Harding’s Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 60-64.

Pruzhinin, Boris I., Tatiana G. Shchedrina. “On the Specifics of Russian Philosophy: A Reply to Mikhail Sergeev.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 8 (2017): 37-41.

Q

R

Radder, Hans. “Everything of Value is Useful: How Philosophy Can be Socially Relevant.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 10 (2016): 20-26

Rancourt, Benjamin T. “The More Evidence Heuristic.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 27-41.

Rappert, Brian. “Brian Martin’s The Deceptive Activist: A Review.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 52-55.

Ratner, Helene. “Anthropology as multi-natural ontology? A response to Marianne de Laet’s ‘Anthropology as social epistemology’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 6 (2013): 5-11.

Rayas, Javier Zavala. “Reply to Liberman and López Olmedo’s ‘Psychological Meaning of “Coauthorship” among Scientists’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 70-72.

Reed, Isaac Ariail. “Science, Democracy and Sociology in the 21st Century: Response to Cruickshank’s ‘Anti-authority.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 40-45.

Reider, Patrick J. “Pittsburgh and the Analytic Tradition in Philosophy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 9 (2012): 20-27.

Reider, Patrick J. “Normative Functionalism in the Pittsburgh School.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 16-28.

Reider, Patrick J. “Sellars and Knowing the Thing-In-Itself.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 68-82.

Reider, Patrick J. “Sellars on Perception, Science, and Realism: A Critical Response.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 9 (2012): 39-56.

Reider, Patrick J. “Knowledge as a Public Commodity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 53-55.

Reiss, Julian and Sarah Wieten. “On Justin Biddle’s ‘Lessons from the Vioxx Debacle’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 20-22.

Remedios, Francis. “Orienting Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 54-59.

Remedios, Francis. “Knowing Humanity in the Social World.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 56-57.

Rickless, Samuel. “Critical Appreciation of Jonathan Schaffer’s The Contrast-Sensitivity of Knowledge Ascriptions’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 1-6.

Riggio, Adam. “Right Thinking for Right Science? On the Pitt-Collier Exchange Over the Purpose of STS.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 2 (2012): 35-39.

Riggio, Adam. “A process of truth: A reply to Steve Fuller’s essay on the silver anniversary of Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 9 (2012): 46-52.

Riggio, Adam. “We Have Never Been Human: How to Build a Movement In a World Without True Unity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 2 (2013): 30-34.

Riggio, Adam. “The Regeneration of the Book Review. A Reply to Stephen T. Casper.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 1-5.

Riggio, Adam. “Understanding the Worldly Character of Knowledge and Reason.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 58-59.

Riggio, Adam. “’I Feel Like I’ve Heard All This Before,’ A Reply to Stenmark and Lukes.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 70-73.

Riggio, Adam, Gregory Sandstrom and Monique Dufour. “Beyond Polemic, Part, I.” Review of The Science Delusion, by Curtis White. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 7-11.

Riggio, Adam. “‘I Feel Like I’ve Heard All This Before,’ A Reply to Stenmark and Lukes.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 73-76.

Riggio, Adam. “A Transhuman Remains All Too Human, or What’s the Point of Bio-Technological Enhancement If You’ll Still Be the Same Old Jerk? Part II.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 5-9.

Riggio, Adam. “Editing Memory: A Reply to Melanie White and Other Critics.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 13-18.

Riggio, Adam. Legacy: A Review of James Kastely’s The Rhetoric of Plato’s Republic. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 11 (2015): 34-39.

Riggio, Adam. “Freeing Knowledge: The Renegade Generation of Philosophical Writers in the New Age of Corporate Universities.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no 12 (2015): 39-41.

Riggio, Adam. “Can We Redeem Academia’s Worst Contempt?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 13-21.

Riggio, Adam. “Beyond the Academy: Solutions to the Academic Brain Drain in Embracing Public Creativity and Leadership.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 71-77.

Riggio, Adam. “The Pragmatic Radicalism of the Multitude’s Power: A Critical Eye on Fuller’s Return to Pareto.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 54-62.

Riggio, Adam. “The Violence of Pure Reason: Neoreaction: A Basilisk. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 34-41.

Riggio, Adam. “Subverting Reality: We Are Not ‘Post-Truth,’ But in a Battle for Public Trust.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 66-73.

Riggio, Adam. “Beyond Socrates: The Philosopher as Creative Craftsperson.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 13-21.

Riggs, Wayne. “Response to David Coady.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 7 (2012): 17-20.

Rip, Arie. “On Epistemic Effects: A Reply to Castellani, Pontecorvo and Valente.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no.1 (2014): 47-51.

Rishani, Diana. “The Aesthetic Fate of the Body: Where Transhumanism Places the Body in the Art Medium & the Ethics Governing This Relationship.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 3, no. 5 (2014): 17-24.

Rishani, Diana. “On Feminist Epistemology: The Fallibility of Gendered Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, No. 6 (2014): 91-93.

Rishani, Diana. “Living Architecture in Dead Spaces: ‘Why Haven’t You Stopped Dying?’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 4 (2015): 14-18.

Robins, Daniel. “Toxic Necro-Waste.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 39-42.

Rockmore, Tom. “The Pittsburgh School, The Given and Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 29-38.

Rockmore, Tom. “Kasavin on Social Epistemology and Naturalism: A Critical Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 2 (2013): 8-11.

Rockmore, Tom. “Further reply to Kasavin: Context, Meaning and Truth.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 3 (2013): 22-24.

Rodbell, Al. “Social Epistemology as Oxymoron and Challenge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 37-39.

Rodriguez Medina, Leandro. “From Humanising to Politicizing Sociological Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 67-70.

Rolin, Kristina. “‘Facing the Incompleteness of Epistemic Trust’ – A Critical Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 74-78.

Rolin, Kristina. “Collective Epistemic Responsibility: A Reply to Chris Dragos.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 11 (2016): 7-11.

Ross, Ben. “Between Poison and Remedy: Transhumanism as Pharmakon. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 23-26.

Ross, Derek G. “Reply to Zoltan Majdik on ‘Ambiguous Weighting and Nonsensical Sense.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 5 (2012): 13-15.

Ruben, David-Hillel. “Reply to Williams.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 8-9.

Ruben, David-Hillel. “Reply to Williams’ Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 21-22.

Ruben, David-Hillel. “More on True Succession and Tradition: Replying to Lebens and Payton.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 29-31.

Ruben, David-Hillel. “Internal and External Perspectives: Reply to Beckstein.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 55-56.

Ruben, David-Hillel. “Addressing Ruben’s ‘Internal and External Perspectives: Reply to Beckstein.’” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 35-36.

Ruben, David-Hillel. “A Further Reply to Beckstein.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 94.

S

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Science, Ideology and Knowledge: A Reply to “Social Epistemology Revisted.”” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 3 (2012): 29-34.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “In Steve Fuller’s Words: Intelligent Design.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 6 (2012): 3-20.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “The Courage of Extending Humanity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2012).

Sandstrom, Gregory, Thomas Basbøll, Emma Craddock and Eric O. Scott. “Intelligent design as social epistemology: Collective judgment forum.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 7 (2012): 1-11.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “How many ‘sciences’ are there?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 10 (2012): 4-15.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Laws of media – The four effects: A McLuhan contribution to social epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 12 (2012): 1-6.

Sandstrom, Gregory, Adam Riggio and Monique Dufour. “Beyond Polemic, Part, II.” Review of The Science Delusion, by Curtis White. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 14-21.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Memetics vs. Human Extension: Round One – A Meme by Any Other Name.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 28-37.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Extending Knowledge and the Extended Mind: Interview Report Précis.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no.2 (2014): 34-37.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Human Satellites and Creative Extension.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 60-63.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Reinventing Humanity with a New Sociological Imagination.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 56-61.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Steve Fuller’s False Hope in IDism: The Discovery Institute’s Anti-Transhumanism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 10 (2015): 1-7.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Fuller than Complete: Darwin’s Age Comes to an End.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 11 (2016): 12-17.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Trans-Evolutionary Change Even Darwin Would Accept.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 11 (2016): 18-26.

Sandstrom, Gregory. “Who Would Live in a Blockchain Society? The Rise of Cryptographically-Enabled Ledger Communities.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 5 (2017): 27-40.

Sartwell, Crispin. “Anti-Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 62-75.

Sassower, Raphael. “Upstream, Anyone? A Critical Reply to J. J. Fellows’ ‘Downstream of the Experts’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 8 (2013): 139-142.

Sassower, Raphael. “A Bridge over Turbulent Waters: A Reply to Justin Cruickshank on Comparing Popper and Rorty.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 3 (2014): 57-59.

Sassower, Raphael. “Problem-Solving Critical Contingencies: Popper and Rorty According to Cruickshank.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 30-32.

Sassower, Raphael. “Beyond Lamentations: Comments on Justin Cruickshank’s Public Intellectuals, Education and the Need for Dissatisfaction.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 50-54.

Sassower, Raphael. “Appealing to Academics to Become Public Intellectuals: A Reply to Justin Cruickshank and Ioana Cerasella Chis.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 11 (2014): 42-45.

Sassower, Raphael. “Popper as a Socratic Public Intellectual.”Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 35-37.

Sassower, Raphael. “Radical Public Intellectuals.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 57-63.

Sassower, Raphael. “Beyond Hubris: Desiderata of the Future of Political Economy.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 7 (2015): 38-50.

Sassower, Raphael. “Norms and Faith: Comments on the Business of People.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 1-10.

Sassower, Raphael and Seif Jensen. “The Problem of Demarcation Isn’t Going Away: On the Legitimation of the Social Sciences in Light of Popper, Cruickshank, and Reed.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 69-84.

Sawyer, Sarah. “Contrastivism and Anti-Individualism: A Response to Aikin and Dabay.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 1-6.

Sawyer, Sarah. “Contrastivism and Anti-Individualism Part II: A Further Response to Aikin and Dabay.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 10-12.

Scalambrino, Frank. “Tales of the mighty tautologists?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 83-97.

Scalambrino, Frank. “From a Statement of Its Vision Toward Thinking into the Desire of a Corporate Daimon.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 10 (2014): 34-39.

Scalambrino, Frank, Adam Riggio, Emma Craddock and Susan Dieleman. “The Future of the Enlightenment?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 33-36.

Scalambrino, Frank. “Employees as Sims? The Conflict Between Dignity and Efficiency.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 35-47.

Scalambrino, Frank. “How Technology Influences Relations to Self and Others: Changing Conceptions of Humans and Humanity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 30-37.

Scheman, Naomi. “Reply to Louise Antony.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 9 (2013): 1-11.

Schweber, Libby. “Critical Reply to David Hess’ ‘Neoliberalism and the History of STS Theory.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 10 (2013): 7-11.

Schyfter, Pablo. “Function, Functional Status, and the Primacy of the Collective: A Reply to Garson.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 38-43.

Sergeev, Mikhail. “‘Integral Knowledge’ and Enlightenment Rationalism: A Reply to Pruzhinin and Shchedrina.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 4 (2017): 1-3.

Seidel, Markus. “Ludwik Fleck’s Scientism.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 79-88.

Selinger, Evan. “The Politics of Expertise, Patronage, and Public Engagement.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 8 (2014): 13-18.

SERRC. “Crediting People: An Exchange.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2014).

SERRC. “Bourdieu and Language.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2013).

SERRC. “Horizons for Social Sciences and Humanities – Post-Conference Interview.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2013).

SERRC. “Social Epistemology’s 25th Anniversary – The original statement of purpose from 1987 by Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2012).

Shaw, Jamie. “Feyerabend and the Cranks: On Demarcation, Epistemic Virtues, and Astrology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2017): 74-88.

Shearmur, Jeremy. “Popper, Social Epistemology and Dialogue.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 9 (2017): 1-12.

Sherman, Ben. “(Less Un-) Attainable Virtues: A Response to Alfano.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 10 (2015): 14-18

Sherman, Ben. “Learning How to Think Better: A Response to Davidson and Kelly.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 48-53.

Shiffman, Mark. “Real Alternatives on Decisive Issues: A Response to Alcibiades Malapi-Nelson.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 52-55.

Simbürger, Elisabeth. “Social Epistemology As Work: A Quest for Normativity at the University.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 4 (2014): 4-6.

Simmons, J. Aaron. “Existence and Epistemic Trust.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 14-19.

Simões dos Reis, Verusca, Riggio, Adam and Simbürger, Elisabeth. “Does the Public University Still Exist?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 3 (2012): 14-17.

Smith, Leonie. “Challenges and Suggestions for a Social Account of Testimonial Sensitivity.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 6 (2016): 18-26.

Smolkin, Doran. “Clarifying the Dependence Condition: A Reply to Benjamin McCraw’s, ‘The Nature of Epistemic Trust’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no 10 (2015): 10-13.

Sokolova, Tatiana. “Scientist as Fiction Writer: Soviet Science-Fiction and Space Exploration.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 3-13.

Spurrett, David. “Disintegrating Galileo: A Commentary on Pablé.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 1 (2013): 23-27.

Stenmark, Mikael. “Relativism and Uncertainty – A Response to Lukes and Riggio.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 10-15

Stöckelová, Tereza. “Unspoken Complicity: Further Comments on Castellani, Pontecorvo and Valente and Rip.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 2 (2015): 17-20.

Stokes, Patrick. “Between Generalism and Particularism about Conspiracy Theory: A Response to Basham and Dentith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 10 (2016): 34-39.

Stokes, Patrick. “Reluctance and Suspicion: Reply to Basham and Dentith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 48-58.

Suomela, Todd. “Some (Initial) Connections between Citizen Science and Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 2 (2014): 17-18.

Swindal, James. “Norms and Causes: Loosing the Bonds of Deontic Constraint.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 117-132.

Szigeti, András. “Seumas Miller: Joint Epistemic Action and Collective Moral Responsibility—A Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 14-19.

Szymanski, Erika. “Review—Experts: The Knowledge and Power of Expertise. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 33-36.

Szymanski, Erika. “A Brief Note on Defining Expertise: A Reply to Grundmann.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 43-45.

T

Technoprogressive Declaration. Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, Transvision 2014 Conference, Paris.

Tatchell, Jessica. “Making Human Rights Fit for the 21st Century: The Challenge of Morphological Freedom.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 8 (2015): 34-39.

Taylor, Peter J. “Questioning the Darwinism that Lynch Presents as a Viable Basis for Humans to Pursue Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 85-87.

Taylor, Peter. “Not Throwing Up My ‘hand in defeat … or reduc[ing] everything to contextual complexity’: A Short Response to Lynch’s Counter-Criticisms.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 65-66.

Tebben, Nicholas and John Waterman. “The Market for Testimony: A Reply to Our Critics.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 5 (2015): 43-51.

Toler, Robyn. “The Progress and Technology of City Life.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 78-85.

Toomey, David. “Thoughts on Weird Life, Scientific Speculation, and the Spaces between the Disciplines.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 3 (2013): 15-18.

Tossut, Silvia. “Which Groups Have Scientific Knowledge? A Reply to Chris Dragos.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 7 (2016): 18-21.

Troyer, John. “‘Owning’ Necro-Waste.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 59-63.

Trufanova, Elena. “A Reply to ‘The Destiny of Atomism in the Modern Science and the Structural Realism’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 3 (2016): 62-65.

Tucker, Aviezer. “Clarifying Testimonial Independence.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 93-96.

Turner, Stephen. “Thinking Epistemically about Experts and Publics: A Response to Selinger.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 36-43.

Tweney, Ryan D. “Commentary on Anderson and Feist’s ‘Transformative Science.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 7 (2017): 23-26.

U

Unger, Stephen H. “Review of Engineers for Change: Competing Visions of Technology in 1960s America, Matthew Wisnioski.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 6 (2013): 1-4.

V

Vähämaa, Miika. “Secrets, Errors and Mathematics: Reconsidering the Role of Groups in Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 9 (2013): 36-51.

Vähämaa, Miika. “Empirical Social Epistemology – The Call for a Socio-Psychological Approach.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6, 69-76.

Vahid, Hamid. “Deontological Perspectivism: A Reply to Lockie.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 12-17.

Van Drooge, Leonie. “Reviewers and Their Roles as Users/Producers.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 8 (2014): 19-21.

Vecchione, Elisa. “Comments on the Technoprogressive Declaration.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 1 (2014): 46-47.

Vermeulen, Niki. “Plant Elicitors as Bio-Objects.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 1-4.

Vernon, Richard. “Evanescent and Embedded Agents.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 4-10.

W

Wagenknecht, Susann. “Four Asymmetries Between Moral and Epistemic Trustworthiness.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 6 (2014): 82-86.

Washington, Natalia. “I Don’t Want to Change Your Mind: A Reply to Sherman.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 3 (2016): 10-14.

Weiss, Sabrina. “Review of Humanity 2.0 by Steve Fuller.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 3 (2012):6-9.

Werkheiser, Ian. “Developing Community Epistemic Capacities.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 2 (2016): 97-101

West, Mark D. “Doxastic Involuntarism, Attentional Voluntarism, and Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 37-51.

West, Mark D. and Jay Rubin. “Epistemological Questions, Boundary Objects and Hopi Myth.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 12 (2015): 1-13.

West, Mark D. “Considering Purposeful Epistemology: On Starting Over. Review of Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Epistemology. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 9 (2016): 19-33.

West, Mark D. “Organic Solidarity, Science and Group Knowledge.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 10 (2016): 1-11.

West, Mark D. “The Holidays and What is Given.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 12 (2016): 17-19.

Westrum, Ron. “Review of Henry Bauer, Dogmatism in Science and Medicine: How Dominant Theories Monopolize Research and Stifle the Search for Truth.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 11 (2012): 10-11.

Wettersten, John. “The Social Scientific Study of Rationality: A Response to Joseph Agassi.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1, no. 2 (2012): 5-10.

Whitaker, Emilie. “Beyond Black and Green: The New Dystopian Plains.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 5 (2014): 67-72.

Whitaker, Emilie. “Social Media—Narrating and Othering Our Selves.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 7 (2014): 55-61.

White, Melanie. “Bergson and Bergsonism: A Reply to Riggio.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 6 (2015): 40-44.

Widger, Tom. “‘Suicidology as a Social Practice’: A Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 3 (2015): 1-4.

Willcutt, Zachary. “The Enframing of the Self as a Problem: Heidegger and Marcel on Modern Technology’s Relation to the Person.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 2 (2017): 11-20

Williams, John. “David-Hillel Ruben’s ‘Traditions and True Successors’: A Critical Reply.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 7 (2013): 40-45.

Williams, John. “Further Reflection on True Successors and Traditions.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 9 (2013): 12-16.

Williams, John. “True Succession and Inheritance of Traditions: Looking Back on the Debate.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 9 (2014): 15-29.

Williams, Pedro Saez . “Natural Authority.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 12 (2013): 46-50.

Williams, Pedro Saez. “Pop Sociology: An Explanation of Batman v Superman’s ‘Rotten’ 29%.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 4 (2016): 37-51.

Winyard, David C. “Review of Steve Fuller, Humanity 2.0: What it Means to be Human Past, Present and Future.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 2 (2013): 16-18.

Winyard, David C. “Polanyi Appeal: A Review of Esther Meek’s Contact With Reality. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 8 (2017): 17-19.

Winyard, David C. “The Promethean Escape.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017): 1-3.

Wojtowicz, Jake. “Disagreeing and Getting to the Truth: A Reply to Sartwell.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, no. 9 (2015): 46-50.

Wolf, Michael P. “Rigid Designation and Natural Kind Terms, Pittsburgh Style.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2, no. 1 (2012): 133-142.

Wolfendale, Peter. “Burning Bridges.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2013).

Wray, K. Brad. “Collective Knowledge and Collective Justification.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 24-27.

X

Y

Z

 

Zagzebski, Linda T. “Trust in Others and Self-Trust: Regarding Epistemic Authority. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6, no. 10 (2017):56-59.

Zaman, Asad. “On Islamic Political Economy: A Brief Reply to Choudhury.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3, no. 12 (2014): 89.

Zenker, Frank. “Having Knowledge from Multiple Testimonies: Reply to Tucker’s ‘The Generation of Knowledge from Multiple Testimonies’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 1 (2016): 52-55.