Volume 11, Issue 8, 1-99, August 2022
Articles, Replies, and Reviews
❧ Gibbons, Adam F. 2022. “On Epistocracy’s Epistemic Problem: Reply to Méndez.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 1-7.
❧ Reynolds, Iaan. 2022. “Critique Without Normative Foundations: Response to Vogelmann and Prusik.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 8-17.
❧ Hill, Scott. 2022. “A Revised Defense of the Le Monde Group.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 18-26.
❧ Hagen, Kurtis. 2022. “A Bibliography and Brief History of the Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 27-37.
❧ Collin, Finn. 2022. “Returning to Bloor and the Strong Program: A Brief Rejoinder to Shahryari.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 38-40.
❧ Dentith, M R. X. 2022. “Avoiding the Stereotyping of the Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories: A Reply to Hill.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 41-49.
❧ Kasprowicz, Dawid. 2022. “Maintaining Relations and Re-Engineering the Social: A Reply to Becker’s ‘The Three Problems of Robotics and AI’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 50-56.
❧ Sudall, Edward. 2022. “Constructive Critique: Social Value in Science Fact.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 57-74.
❧ Špecián, Petr. 2022. “Shall Justice Prevail? Reforming the Epistemic Basic Structure in a Non-Ideal World.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 75-83.
❧ Martin, Brian. 2022. “When to Read a Heavy Tome.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 84-89.
❧ Fuller, Steve. 2022. “How to Think Like God: A Swedish Twitter University Course.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 90-92.
❧ Hill, Scott. 2022. “The Role of Stereotypes in Theorizing about Conspiracy Theories: A Reply to Dentith.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8): 93-99.
Categories: Comments
Leave a Reply